Saturday, July 16, 2016



EXCLUSIVE: France ‘Suppressed Reports of Gruesome Torture’ at Bataclan Massacre

Piles of dead bodies in pools of blood

By Louise Mensch




July 15, 2016


HEAT STREET EXCLUSIVE – A French government committee has heard testimony, suppressed by the French government at the time and not published online until this week, that the killers in the Bataclan appear to have tortured their victims on the second floor of the club.

The chief police witness in Parliament testified that on the night of the attacks, an investigating officer, tears streaming down his face, rushed out of the Bataclan and vomited in front of him just after seeing the disfigured bodies.

The 14-hour testimony about the November attacks took place March 21st.

According to this testimony, Wahhabist killers reportedly gouged out eyes, castrated victims, and shoved their testicles in their mouths. They may also have disemboweled some poor souls. Women were reportedly stabbed in the genitals – and the torture was, victims told police, filmed for Daesh or Islamic State propaganda. For that reason, medics did not release the bodies of torture victims to the families, investigators said.
But prosecutors at the hearing claimed these reports of torture were “a rumor” on the grounds that sharp knives were not found at the scene. They also claimed that maybe shrapnel had caused the injuries.

Q. For the information of the Commission of Inquiry….can you tell us how you learned that there had been acts of barbarism within the Bataclan: beheadings, evisceration, eyes gouged out …?

Investigator: After the assault, we were with colleagues at the passage Saint-Pierre Amelot when I saw weeping from one of our colleagues who came outside  to vomit. He told us what he had seen.

Q. Acts of torture happened on the second floor?
Further on the investigator described how this was kept from relatives:  

Bodies have not been presented to families because there were beheaded people there, the murdered people, people who have been disemboweled. There are women who had their genitals stabbed.

Q. All this would have been videotaped for Daesh ! 

A. I believe so. Survivors have said so.

Elsewhere, the investigator says, women were sexually tortured, stabbed in the genitals, and their eyes were plucked out. People were decapitated.

The clerk of the inquiry (or “rapporteur”) pressed the chief of committee for clarity on whether victims were decapitated or mutilated. The committee chief replied that the authorities had given out conflicting information that said victims were merely shot or blown up. He then added this damning statement about one victim’s father discovering the gruesome truth in the morgue:

Mr. President Georges Fenech Indeed, the Committee is troubled by this information which has appeared nowhere [in the media]. Thus, the father of one of the victims sent me a copy of a letter he sent to the investigating judge, which I quote in summary: “On the causes of the death of my son A., at the forensic institute in Paris, I was told, and what a shock it was for me at that moment, they had cut off his testicles, had put them in his mouth, and he was disemboweled. 

When I saw him behind glass, lying on a table, a white shroud covering it up to the neck, a psychologist was with me. He said: This is “the only presentable part, your son’s left profile.” 

I found that he had no right eye. I made the remark; I was informed that they had punctured his eye and  sliced down the right side of his face, where there was a very large hematoma that we could all see. ”

This particular witness could corroborate the statements that we heard from one of the BAC officials, that one of his investigators vomited immediately on leaving the Bataclan after finding a decapitation and evisceration. Are you aware of such facts?

A prosecutor appearing before the inquiry replied lamely that no sharp knife had been found at the scene that could have been used for torture. Perhaps shrapnel had caused the mutilation, he said. The head of the committee asked if an explosion would have placed testicles in a victim’s mouth:

Prosecutor: I specify, for the sake of clarity: some of the bodies found at the Bataclan were extremely mutilated by the explosions and weapons, to the point that it was sometimes difficult to reconstruct the dismembered bodies. In other words, injuries described this father may also have been caused by automatic weapons, by explosions or projections of nails and bolts that have resulted.

Q. Would those have put a man’s balls 
in his own mouth?

Prosecutor: I do not have that information.


[The news follows reports that German police sat on the huge number of sexual assaults committed by Islamist migrants in Cologne, which a secret report estimated at thousands, not hundreds. Heat Street will continue to report.]


The face of Islam

39 comments:

  1. It is amazing how the left pride themselves on being the guarding of the First Amendment,yet not when it comes to opposing views that threaten their augments.

    Keep the good work FT, and never let up.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you.

      I shall keep trying as long as there is breath in my body.

      Unfortunately, the desire to prevent Evil from taking over, and to frustrate, balk, thwart , diminish, and destroy it wherever it threatens has been portrayed all too successfully as "hate" by our enemies.

      THE TRUTH IS NOT HATE SPEECH.

      Delete
  2. And with shouts of "Allahu akbar!"

    Wahhabist Islam is a death cult. Period.

    You can't reason with these savages.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. In the wake of what has happened since 911 no decent, sensible person could possibly argue against that.

      DIDADIN!

      Delete
  3. ISLAM IS A RELIGON OF PEECE~! ALLAH HAS NO PLACE FOR BLASFEME! WE WILL CUT YOUR HEAD OFF!!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Please try harder to present your opinions in good English with a little more dignity.

      Delete
  4. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. We don't approve of TATTLETALES at FreeThinke's biog.

      Delete
  5. The left, especially the Progressive's are already on the attack of Mr. Pence, But I can only imagine the DISASTER FOR AMERICA. if Hillary Clinton gets elected.,

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Of course, what else would we expect from the Left?

      Please try to introduce some new ideas and avoid telling us what we already know.

      Thanks.

      Delete
  6. Stupidly had its consequencesJuly 16, 2016 at 10:22 AM

    Those of you that are going to be voting for Hillsry have not learned snything from the past 8 years, and I pity your retardness.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What do you think of the material presented in the POST?

      Delete
  7. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. At this blog comments MUST respond to the contents of the POST.

      Please respect our standards in future.

      Delete
  8. I Love to be RightJuly 16, 2016 at 12:12 PM

    Just watched Pence's speech, and all I can say is Eat your Progressive Hearts Out!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, I agree that Pence is a good choice, and Mr.Trump's introduction was beautifully done. He was calm, collected, dignified and sincere.

      HOWEVER, this post is about the horrific deeds perpetrated by ISLAMANIACS.

      In future please try to respect our rules nd guidelines.

      This is not an Open Forum for making speeches on any subject that tickles your fancy. ;-)

      Delete
  9. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Can't you READ?

      How many times do I have to say WE DO NOT ACCEPT IRRELEVANT COMMENTS in order got get it through your thick skull?

      Delete
  10. Call me right, even if I'm a leftyJuly 16, 2016 at 3:07 PM

    Another person backs out of TrumPence dumpster fire:

    "Ivanka Trump's Rabbi Withdraws From Speaking At Republican Convention

    Yes, another “important” RNC convention speaker, Ivanka Trump’s Rabbi will be a no show after Tim Tebow also nixed Trump’s invitation yesterday…

    Donald Trump is toxic and the Republican convention is now just a joke.

    In an email to his congregation obtained by POLITICO, Rabbi Haskel Lookstein of the Orthodox Congregation Kehilath Jeshurun on the Upper East Side, said that he accepted an invitation from Trump’s daughter to deliver the convocation in Cleveland “out of respect for her and our relationship.”

    But he decided to bow out and explained his reason to the congregation.

    “Unfortunately, when my name appeared on a list of speakers at the convention, without the context of the invocation I had been invited to present, the whole matter turned from rabbinic to political, something which was never intended,” wrote Lookstein, who also served as the principal of the prominent Orthodox Jewish school Ramaz.

    Earlier on Friday, the Jerusalem Post reported that 600 Ramaz alumni had written Lookstein a letter, condemning his decision to speak at the convention. “This is the single action history will remember you by, and history will not be kind,” it read.

    A Trump campaign spokeswoman did not immediately respond to a request for comment."
    Nobody wants to be part of a sinking ship - especially one filled with Trump rats.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jews are overwhelmingly Democrat. *YAWN*

      Delete
    2. Trump's ship is sinking? When he's ahead in the polls?

      The only thing keeping it up, then, must be Hellary's rusted battleship sitting on the rocks below Trump's Ocean Liner.

      Delete
    3. Diddler is correct, and even the one's who claim to be conservatives are not really trustworthy. Look what Bill Kristol has done by going against Trump. Depressing.

      - Boris Spitalotski

      Delete
  11. WE DO NO ACCEPT IRRELEVANT COMMENTS.

    ReplyDelete
  12. WE DO NO ACCEPT IRRELEVANT COMMENTS.

    ReplyDelete
  13. WE DO NO ACCEPT IRRELEVANT COMMENTS.

    ReplyDelete
  14. WE DO NO ACCEPT IRRELEVANT COMMENTS.

    ReplyDelete
  15. WE DO NO ACCEPT IRRELEVANT COMMENTS.

    ReplyDelete
  16. WE DO NO ACCEPT IRRELEVANT COMMENTS.

    ReplyDelete
  17. WE DO NO ACCEPT IRRELEVANT COMMENTS.

    ReplyDelete
  18. WE DO NO ACCEPT IRRELEVANT COMMENTS.

    ReplyDelete
  19. WE DO NO ACCEPT IRRELEVANT COMMENTS.

    GOT THAT?

    ++++++++++++++++++++++

    IF YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND THE FOLLOWING, YOU DON'T BELONG HERE, SO KINDLY GET OUT AND STAY OUT.

    We welcome Conversation
    But without Vituperation.
    If your aim is Vilification ––
    Other forms of Denigration ––
    Unfounded Accusation --
    Determined Obfuscation ––
    Alienation with Self-Justification ––
    We WILL use COMMENT ERADICATION.

    IN ADDITION

    Gratuitous Displays of Extraneous Knowledge Offered Not To Shed Light Or Enhance the Discussion, But For The Primary Purpose Of Giving An Impression Of Superiority are obnoxiously SELF-AGGRANDIZING, and therefore, Subject to Removal at the Discretion of the Censor-in-Residence.

    ReplyDelete
  20. According to this testimony, Wahhabist killers reportedly gouged out eyes, castrated victims, and shoved their testicles in their mouths. They may also have disemboweled some poor souls. Women were reportedly stabbed in the genitals – and the torture was, victims told police, filmed for Daesh or Islamic State propaganda. For that reason, medics did not release the bodies of torture victims to the families, investigators said.
    ____________

    Now wait a minute. Saudi Arabia is the official state sponsor of Wahhabist Islam. They would do THAT for the Islamic State and Daesh?

    But Saudi Arabia is our ally in the "war on terror". Any wonder that it just never gets resolved and goes away. Guess the problem is deeper that we thought.

    Better get John Brennan and the CIA on the case ...

    ReplyDelete
  21. A smart liberal wrote this a few weeks back after the Brexit vote in an article titled, How Brexit Shattered Progressives' Dearest Illusions.

    But what if progressivism isn't inevitable at all? What if people will always be inclined by nature to love their own — themselves, their families, their neighbors, members of their churches, their fellow citizens, their country — more than they love the placeless abstraction of "humanity"? In that case, the act of ignoring or even denigrating this love will have the effect of provoking its defensive wrath and ultimately making it stronger.

    Progressives--many who scoff at belief in a higher power--hold stubborn delusions in the "inevitable" "progress of history."

    We normal and right-thinking people shake our heads at their stupid insistence on violating the laws of nature, turning reason on its head, and ignoring reality.

    Can anyone provide evidence that Muslims (7% of the population and growing) have improved Europe? Can anyone provide evidence that Muslims advance the European values of liberalism, tolerance, and live-and-let-live?

    Individual Muslims in this country have made great contributions to our nation, but Islam has never improved any corner of the modern world where it installed itself.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The woman you quoted is no "liberal" if she believes what she said in that remark.

      Thank you for one of the very few sensible, pertinent comments of the day. I concur with everything you said, except the disclaimer praising "a few good Muslims" towards the end.

      I no longer believe we can afford to like, trust, or put up with ANY Muslims on our soil PERIOD!

      You are much kinder than I, but being kind to Muslims could easily get you –– and everyone near and dear to you –– BRUTALLY MUrDERED.

      It's ether DIDADIN or DEAtH.

      Delete
    2. There's no such thing as a smart liberal just like there's no such thing as a moderate moslem.

      Delete
    3. Oh my Lord, such a violent Trmper !

      Delete
    4. Yes, Miss Pee Pee. At last we agree. Muslims certainly do have a propensity for violent fits of temper that carry them into the realm of outright barbarism.

      We cannot afford to allow then to inhabit our soil.

      Delete
  22. According to this testimony, Wahhabist killers reportedly gouged out eyes, castrated victims, and shoved their testicles in their mouths. They may also have disemboweled some poor souls. Women were reportedly stabbed in the genitals – and the torture was, victims told police, filmed for Daesh or Islamic State propaganda. For that reason, medics did not release the bodies of torture victims to the families, investigators said.
    ____________

    Now wait a minute. Saudi Arabia is the official state sponsor of Wahhabist Islam. They would do THAT for the Islamic State and Daesh?

    But Saudi Arabia is our ally in the "war on terror". Any wonder that it just never gets resolved and goes away. Guess the problem is deeper that we thought.

    Better get John Brennan and the CIA on the case ...

    ReplyDelete

IF YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND THE FOLLOWING, YOU DON'T BELONG HERE, SO KINDLY GET OUT AND STAY OUT.

We welcome Conversation
But without Vituperation.
If your aim is Vilification ––
Other forms of Denigration ––
Unfounded Accusation --
Determined Obfuscation ––
Alienation with Self-Justification ––
We WILL use COMMENT ERADICATION.


IN ADDITION

Gratuitous Displays of Extraneous Knowledge Offered Not To Shed Light Or Enhance the Discussion, But For The Primary Purpose Of Giving An Impression Of Superiority are obnoxiously SELF-AGGRANDIZING, and therefore, Subject to Removal at the Discretion of the Censor-in-Residence.

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.