Tuesday, March 21, 2017


'Twould Seem So.
But, what are YOUR thoughts 
on the subject?

~ § ~


NEWSWEEK - 11/7/16

James Comey should not simply be fired as director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation. He must be barred forever from any form of public service.

In the last 10 days, Comey has whipsawed the election for president of the United States. Now we know he did it for no reason. When his agents found information that suggested there were emails on a laptop that might have relevance to the investigation of Hillary Clinton and her email servers, Comey did not wait until he knew even a scintilla of information before announcing it to the world. Reasonably, lots of voters assumed there must be a there there—who could imagine a person with the power of the FBI director would turn the election on its head for no particular reason, on the basis of nothing?

Then, Sunday, Comey handed down another missive from on high: Never mind. His agents had looked through the emails and decided they were piffle. His majesty, the FBI director, has not yet deigned to officially inform his subjects—the American people—whether the emails related to the Clinton case or what they were. (However, people involved in the case tell Newsweek that almost all of them were duplicates of what the bureau already had or were personal.) He just said “nothing to see here” and waived us on our way.

Well, forget it, Jim. We’re not moving on. America has just witnessed one of the most—if not the most—egregious abuses of power in the service of one man’s ego in its history. Joseph McCarthy and A. Mitchell Palmer at least believed they were fighting a Communist threat. Richard Nixon, in Watergate, at least had the motive of retaining power and covering up wrongdoing. But Comey—who I do not believe did this for partisan reasons—has no such motive. This was about him, about preserving his now forever-destroyed reputation, about preening with his self-satisfied standing as a maverick who acts based on what he thinks is right, regardless of others’ opinion. But there is a very thin line between being independent and being reckless. And Comey has demonstrated he does not know the difference.

Before launching into a full Comey tear-down, a few facts must be understood. The FBI is an investigative arm of the Department of Justice. Nothing more, nothing less. An extremely small minority are lawyers, or even have basic legal training. They do not—thank God—decide who gets indicted and who doesn’t. Prosecutors run criminal cases and direct the agents. As many prosecutors have told me over the years, there is almost never an instance where agents who have been investigating a case for months do not recommend for prosecution. Tunnel vision is one reason; the fact that agents rise in the ranks by delivering cases that lead to prosecution is another. That is why prosecutors—and through them, grand juries—make the decision to charge or not. They both serve as a backstop to agents who don’t know the law and have no ability to objectively review their own evidence.

(This is why all this nonsense pushed by the Fox Newses of the world has been so deceptive: Screaming “the agents wanted to indict” is on par with “the fish wants to swim.” More important—if any agents really did say these things—they are unfit for the bureau; they must be found and fired immediately for this separate abuse of power.)

What that means is, if the FBI does not even conclude it has enough evidence to write a memo recommending prosecution to the Justice Department, there is simply nothing there. Assuming someone committed a crime when the FBI concludes the evidence obtained in the investigation is not worth turning over to prosecutors is like assuming it must be raining when the skies are clear.

The FBI is never supposed to comment on ongoing investigations and, except in exceptional circumstances, never disclose whether it has or has not recommended prosecution. Instead, on indictment, prosecutors stand up at a press conference, announce the charges, then thank the agents and offices of the FBI who conducted the investigation. If the bureau does not develop enough evidence to merit even a recommendation for prosecution, in those exceptional circumstances where it says anything, those are the words officials use: We have not developed evidence that merits a recommendation for prosecution.

In the last few months, unfortunately, Comey has demonstrated he understands none of this. … 

[Complete article available at Lucianne.com New Forum Home Page












  2. Purple-faced, perpetually enraged leftwing Democrats infest a rotten house of hate and intolerance, built upon a foundation of willful fantasies and outright lies.

    When Comey produces no silver bullet with which to take down President Trump, the howls of indignation, tortuous screams and ear drum-rending shrieking from the hooting leftwing loonies will be unbearable.

    Donald Trump is hell-bent for leather to drain the swamp and fulfill his campaign promises. The entire DC Demican-Republicrat-Infotainment News Media-Intelligence-Police State Complex is against him.

    I give him a 50/50 shot of making it to reelection.

    The left has been sapping our foundations for a hundred years, and the foundation started crumbling in the 60's.

    Throw in dingbat CIA crimes around the globe, useless wars we serially-lost, failure to control who comes into the country, declining education standards, a DC Establishment ripping our rights and liberties from us in nibbles, bites and snarks while is spends us into penury...

    We were ripe in 2001. Osama bin Laden won.

    1. Ewan Gallagher said

      Sounds about right, but unduly pessimistic. It's important to maintain good morale. Can't so that without using propaganda.

  3. Well, we now know it was Obama himself who ordered any information about the Russian cyber-sabotage investigations silenced, much to the dismay of Democrats and Clinton, and causing confusion in the agencies as they tried to evade questions that were long since looming. Had Comey revealed that there were investigations and for what and involving whom, Trump very well might not be President right now. Now we know Comey did have dirt on people in the Trump campaign, and apparently there may be more than that.

    Don't shoot the messenger, especially the silenced one.

    Speaking of...

    A deranged anti-Semite, who also just can't stand the thought of liberal bias in the media, tried to kill Eichenwald (the writer of this article from last year) recently with an animated email intentionally design to send him into an epileptic fit that could kill him, and almost did. Ironically, Eichenwald's dad is Jewish but he is not nor ever was.

    I think we're getting too crazy over this sort of stuff these days.

    Oh, and NOW we know the Russian's only liked Trump because they they think he's a pliable businessman, but we ALSO now know the Russians preferred Republicans in general, and aimed fake-news bot attacks at democrats in general, mostly in the primaries, to incite party turmoil. That part of the plan didn't work very well, but the heavy bot attacks on Clinton certainly played a role in riling up the more narrowly anti-Clinton vote. But it is very interesting that the Russians are suddenly infatuated with GOP. Lord knows, conservatives and Republicans have had a man-crush on Putin for years. He's a manly man, ya' know! LOL!


    1. Ewan Gallagher said

      You sound like one of those liberals Ronald Reagan told us about. You know so many things that just aren't true.

      Where do yiu get yiur information?

    2. A deranged anti-Semite, who also just can't stand the thought of liberal bias in the media, tried to kill Eichenwald (the writer of this article from last year) recently with an animated email intentionally design to send him into an epileptic fit that could kill him, and almost did. Ironically, Eichenwald's dad is Jewish but he is not nor ever was.


      Interesting. I wonder how it was determined to be an anti-Semite that couldn't "stand the thought of liberal-bias in the media"? Was that your interpretation JMJ?

      Personally, for someone to know about a personal medical condition, and to be so psychologically manipulative I'd first suspect something way more nefarious—like, say the CIA. They're deeply involved in mind-bending and particularly involved with the media and journalism especially through their OPERATION MOCKINGBIRD

    3. Well, Waylon and Ewan, I read a few articles about it. Doesn't take much effort.

      As for Reagan, he was an idiot. And the idiots made him a God. God of the Idiots.


    4. WHAT articles did you read in reference to this, Jersey? And from WHAT publications did they come?

      I shall try to forget wat you said about President Regan because it's deeply offensive to me and everyrthing I believe in.

      As for Eichenwald, surely you are not one of those who've fallen for the line that as Jew is not Jew unless he practices Judaism, and regularly attends Synagogue completel with shawl and Yarmulka?

      Just remember this the next time you feel like levying a broadside:

      We learn more about Jersey from what he says abut Reagan than we learn about Reagan.

      And what we've learned today does NOT flatter you, my friend, I'm very sorry to have to say..

  4. This sonnet was penned twenty years ago in reference to the Clintons‘ Whitewater woes, but I see now that the basic sentiments apply to the way politics is conducted all the time. Proof once more that "The more things change, the more they remain the same.” - FT

    _____ Sail On, O Ship of State ______

    What the truth might be no one can find.
    Hopeless is the quest on either side
    Invested as they are in staying blind
    To anything that points to Power denied.
    Entrenched in battle lines made to endure,
    Weapons drawn and ready to attack.
    A motivating force that’s quite impure
    Twists logic into seeing white as black.
    Examining our leaders’ feet of clay
    Removes us from confronting our own flaws,
    While they decisive action can delay
    On how to rid the Nation’s Face of yaws.
    Electing pugilists who throw the fight
    Scorches angels’ wings, yet sheds no light.

    ~ FreeThinke - The Sandpiper, Summer 1997


    It's such fun singing Songs of Doom
    Here in Blogger's Romper Room
    Intoxicating more than Meth
    Is the foetid Breath of Death.
    'Tis wondrous to behold the Sighs
    Accompanying our Demise!
    Gabbling here in Romper Room
    Makes joy in contemplating Doom!
    More fun even than coition
    Is the constant opposition!
    Harmony is oh-so boring
    And doubtless soon would see us snoring!
    Life for some sans sneers and sniping
    Would be reduced to weak shrill piping!

    ~ Anne Imus in Mourning

  6. Trump-Obsessed Media Pay No Attention to the Man Holding the Political Puppet Strings

    Washington Times,

    by Charles Hurt

    3/22/2017 8:07:20 AM

    For a guy who claims to be above or beneath or beside grubby politics
    in America, FBI chief James Comey sure does manage to insert himself
    into the seamiest corners of politics and seize the spotlight at the most
    fraught moments possible.

    In this past election, Jim Comey was the “Where’s Waldo?” of
    American politics. First he condemns Lady Dragon Hillary with
    the most damning exoneration in the history of public prosecutions.
    Then he slays her in public with just weeks to go before the election —
    only to ride up on his armor-suited horse in a failed effort to resuscitate ...

    [Compete article available at Lucianne.com News Forum Home Page]

    1. If it wasn't Comey, it would be whoever else. The fact that we have these problems shouldn't be blamed on those investigating them.


    2. No, Jersey. They should be blamed on those either INVENTING them out of whole cloth to undermine politica, enemies, else PUSHING exaggerated, deliberately distorted views of trivialities at the public solely to serve a political agenda.

      There is no interest whatsoever in pursuing TRUTH these days, only in WINNING BATTLES at ALL COSTS.

    3. Inventing? Inventing what? Distorting what?

      FT, the GOP has become deeply morally corrupt, just like Putin and his cronies (but less patriotic). It's no wonder they like each other. Any involvement with Putin's mafiacracy should raise the eyebrows of any person of good will.


    4. Jersey, it's painfully obvious to me that you BELIEVE tainted sources like The New York Times, the New Yorker, The Washington Post and muckraking 'reporters' like Seymour Hersh, Greg Pallast, Joe Conason, Katrina vanden Heuvel, Amy Goodman, pseudo "historians" like Howard Zinn and dreary, sour-moutrhed Jewish "intellectuals" like Herbert Marcuse, Noam Chomsky the late Susan Sontag, and reporters like Ellen Ratner and her rotten Communist brother.

      You have been STEEPED in pseudo-liberal negativism and the septic MYTHS those people concoct –– the incessant series of BIG LIES and hideous distortions they shamelessly put forth and ceaselessly promote through the powerful conduits owned and operated by the demins who control the ENEMEDIA.

      You've been sadly MISINFORMED apparfenty all your life. Remember I'm old enough to be your father, knew a good many people who had been born immediately after the Civil War, heard their stories, learned of their values, and experienced far far FAR BETTER times than these when I was young, so I KNOW from firsthand experience what i'm talking about.

      I like you, personally, very much, but your mind –– and the minds of most memebers of your generation and younger –– were POISONED by the vicious intellectual aggressors who've been plotting and scheming for over a hundred years with horrifying success to bring us down.

      You don't realize that you –– and too many millions of others –– have been severely VICTIMIZED by these professional prevaricators –– these Pied Pipers –– these bogus Prophets of Doom, –– these sneering Snake Oil Salesmen –– these Masters of Deceit, Treachery, Intellectual Chicanery and Legerdemain from HELL.

      I don't expect you to believe me, but i HAVE to tell you in the hope you might still have a chance to recover from the dreadful MISEDUCATION you have received.

    5. Ewan Gallagher said

      What FreeThinke said to you above seems an accurate assessment to me, Jersey. I don't think he meant gto insult you, I think he hoped he mght wake you up to the injustice that's been done to you through years of leftist indoctrination in the popular culture, and our sick, anti-American educational system.

      I hope you will listen to voices other than the ones who've invaded and inhabited your head for most of your life. People who think differently are not "insane," a term that gets thoughtlessly bandied about by too many, but often they are seriously misguided.

      Try not to fall so easily into stereotypical patterns, which are nothing more than channels cut into the ground by leftist mythmakers that carry you to pre-determined, politically motivated destinations.without your even realizing it.

  7. The photo shows a man in an extreme rage. It would be interesting to know the context because it does capture a most unflattering pose.

    1. Comey's demeanor in pubic hearings is always poised, extremely controlled, even-tempered, apparently dispassionate. His voice betrays little or no emotion, but he makes a sometimes-maddening practice of GIVING absolutely NOTHING to his interlocutors.

      His being caught in grotesque grimace like the one posted here today is mos unusual I don't know whether he was just about to sneeze and got caught by the camera, or wheter this most unattractive expression is a sign that his "mask" slipped for a second or two thus betraying who he REALLY is.

      Professional photographers snap literally hundreds of pictures in rapid succession at events they cover you know, so they're bound to catch a VIP in an unflattering pose sooner or later. I know I would hate to be photographed unawares.

      The thing that concerns me about him is the extreme inconsistencies in the positions he takes. As others have said, "Comey is all over the map." He seems o switch sides perioducally wihout ever admitting that he's ever TAKEN sides.

      The guy sees to take satisfaction in CONFOUNDING everyone within eyeshot.

      It seems obvious he's playong some sort of "game," but what it is –– and what its purpose might be –– remains shrouded in mystery.

      The whole thing is downright creepy.

    2. FT,
      Comey's demeanor in pubic hearings is always poised, extremely controlled, even-tempered, apparently dispassionate.

      Too controlled and a mask for public consumption, IMO.

    3. I've checked some YouTube sites that have this picture but it seems to be a waste of time. They say that it involved some response to questioning by Trey Gowdy but nothing in the videos I've seen come close to matching what they promote.

    4. Trey Gowdy is an ACE –– an old-fashioned square shooter. He doesnt play games, so the Capitol Hill Cronies Club doesn't know what to make of Trey. His very presence confounds them.

      Most of the veteran Washington Power Elites are so unused to dealing with the Truth, they can no longer recognize it, even when its smacks them right in the kisser.

    5. Ewwww.... do you really like that Gowdy guy? He's like one of those backwoods guys from Deliverance. What on Earth would you like about him? You'd have to define "old-fashioned straight shooter" as "bunny-eyed malevolent liar partisan!" You are far too cultured for this.


    6. You know, AOW, I have thougt the sae thing, but isn't that typical –– even NECESSARY for ibe's survival –– when dealing with that pit of vipers?

      This isb't the time or tge pklace to bring it up, but a very simular thought crossed my mind when I was watching the Honorable Neil Gorsuch being hectored and badgered by the DemonRats yesterday.

      I .mean HE (Gorsuch) is SO controlled it just HAS to be a deliberately cultivated ATTITUDE.

      I doubt if ANYONE could be THAT much of a straight arrow and still be HUMAN.

      I'm not sure he can betrusted to back up President Trump if push comes to shove. People who are THAT principled rarely make good allies in a knock-down-drag-out-fight.

      God help us if Gorsuch gets in and turns out be another Earl Warren, David Souter or John Roberts!

    7. None of my alarm bells have sounded with regard to Gorsuch -- yet, anyway.

      IMO, Gorsuch isn't slick, but Comey is.

    8. Sorry for butting in with AOW and you. You must be watching the confirmation hearings too. As we know, you don't get much from those but a little feeling for the candidates personality, sometimes their class distinction (he clearly defines himself as a likeable Blue Blood), contemporaneous thinking proficiency, etc. Of course, that last observation can tell you a lot.

      I've had a little more time now to do some reading on Gorsuch, I realized he's very good at not standing out in the middle of big decisions. He very rarely wrote additional opinions, and his decisions were boilerplate Republican.

      He says his "childhood hero" was Byron White, a hilarious way to say it, but he meant he's going to be more favorable to more aggressive policing and national security.

      His rulings in class actions and and the Hobby Lobby case show a propensity for going out of his way to rule in favor of religious or corporate interests.

      He reminds me of Roberts, but I think Roberts is a little more substantial a thinker. I get the feeling Gorsuch gets by with his good looks and sociability quite a bit.

      PS: Did you hear the news that just came out about Nunes briefing Trump on those reports! LOL! omg... (sigh...)


    9. JMJ,
      Butting in? I don't see it that way.

      I get the feeling Gorsuch gets by with his good looks and sociability quite a bit.

      Could be. Anyone as fine looking as he is often does that kind of thing.

      I'm not convinced that Chief Justice Roberts is a deep thinker. Then again, I don't have time to read the SCOTUS decisions.

      As for Nunes, some are reporting that what he said today has vindicated Trump.

    10. Oh, there are stories, alright (I wouldn't call it "reporting")...

      Nunes ran to the White House with leaked documents of uncertain origin regarding foreign intercepts (SOP) with certain people around Trump. Russia is not involved, and neither is Trump personally. No crimes are indicated in any of this except the leaking American names which would have been later added by the relevant agencies (when?). What Nunes did was so sleazy and inept he pretty much guaranteed that his oversight committee is about to be pushed aside by the Senate, and the likelihood of a special prosecutor or select committee now just increased exponentially, and they'll be culling through everything.

      Nunes is not competent enough for his job.


    11. JMJ,
      That's one way of looking at the Nunes matter.

      Another way: the POTUS should know if snooping and dangerous leaks were or are afoot -- particularly within agencies which are part of the executive branch. Also, what Nunes said at least implies that Comey was less than honest during his recent testimony on Capitol Hill.

      How one reacts to the Nunes matter depends on one's political alignment.

    12. Yeah, but in this case, Nunes appears to be the leak, or at the least the immediate receiver...


  8. Vladimir Lenin once said “A lie told or repeated often enough soon becomes the truth

    And we all know that Obama knows his Lenin. And that is no lie!
    Lenin, Stalin, Obama, Eric Holder Bill and Hillary Clinton. “What Difference Does It make”!
    This president's past history is totally based on lies. Right from day one when he had sealed his papers so no one can learn the truth about his background,or see his Birth Certificate. At this point it doesn’t make any difference if the Certificate was true or Fake. The point is that this president went through a lot of trouble trying to hide it. And that’s NO lie. .
    We all know that once someone lies, especially someone that we should be trusting above anyone else, they then find it much easier to lie again a second time and then a third time, and again and again until it becomes habitual; he or she tells lies without thinking about it. And soon without anyone in the world believing it.
    Hillary Clinton called it "Miss Speaking"! Oops, I Misspoke About That Bosnia Experience ... when she spoke about her and her crew landing in Bosnia “under sniper fire." When it was CLEAR and proved by Video footage that there was NO visible threat from “sniper fire” at all. In fact the video showed her and her daughter Chelsea at a greeting ceremony on the tarmac. They were greeted by a little Bosnian girl reading them a poem. Hillary and Chelsea even paused to take pictures.
    When this falsehood of the tongue was questioned by the press and Chelsea was asked about what happened, she said, "I support what my Mother said," and backed up Hillary’s LIE!
    Which brings us back to President Obama’s now famous lying and repeating it several times to secure support for the Affordable Care Act –“If you like your plan, you can keep your plan”!
    Obama said in a campaign speech that his father served in World War 2. Oh Yeah Right! The communist Kenyan was 9 years old when that war ended., so he must have been the YOUNGEST soldier who ever served. And how about “I Promises to Close Guantanamo Bay” Still waiting!

    Obama has mounted monuments of lies. And the Mother of ALL Lies, and the most blatant lie was prior to the 2012 elections, when he claimed that the Sept. 11 attack that killed our Ambassador to Libya and three Seals acting as security personnel was a “spontaneous demonstration” based on a video regarding Mohammed.
    Yes, they were Brutally Killed after they repeatedly ask for more help and security, and the rescue never came
    As we know, that was a blatant lie, but in her testimony before a congressional committee then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton famously asked “What difference does it make?”

    Obama’s lies go all the back to his Oath of Office in January of 2009, when he said,
    “I do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”
    The constant lies that sets the Obama administration above anyone else continued throughout his 2nd term in office, lets not forget Lois Lerner, on leave from the Internal Revenue Service and likely subject to a contempt of Congress citation after it has become obvious that she was a key player in the deliberate effort to deny tax exempt status to “Conservatives”, “The Tea Party”, Israeli Organizations, and other Conservative organizations that need it to raise funds.

    Also let us remember that the Attorney General has already been slapped with a contempt of Congress citation after refusing to give up documents regarding the “Fast and Furious” program that put guns in the hands of Mexican drug cartels. all lead back to Our Dear Leader, the Liar in Chief Barack Obama.
    But our dear friends, the Liberals always defend Obama by bringing up “Bush Lied”

    1. Why are you telling us all this on a thread devoted to the bizarre antics of JAMES COMEY?

      Don't you READ before posting?

      Hyiubhave given us BOILERPLATE. We don't want BOILERPLATE here. I should delete it, but will leave it for a while in the hope that you will return and talk to us about JAMES COMEY and the impact his behavior has had on recent events.

      It is not unreasinable for us to expect your comments to be related to the topic of the post.

  9. The Reporter Who Made Up Sources, Hated Trump and Was Bernie Sanders Supporter Arrested for Anti-Semitic Bomb Threats
    And yet Sanders, who demands Attorney General Jeff Sessions Resign, has Not disavowed anti-Semitic supporter!

    There has been a recent wave of anti-Semitism lately and naturally the left wants to blame it on Trump. But the only guy arrested so far was a supporter of Bernie Sanders who hated Trump. He's also a former reporter who made up sources and quotes. Can we say FAKE NEWS!

    Juan Thompson was arrested in St. Louis. Aside from being an anti-Semite and perhaps a Muslim he has made a lot of threats:
    When Bernie Sanders office was repeatedly asked if the Senator condemned Thompson's acts or words, there was no response.

    Just another example of how the hate state works. Dem's drive their delusional supporters to the most vile acts of hate and violence yet never take responsibility for their words!

    1. Why are you telling us all this on a thread devoted to the bizarre antics of JAMES COMEY?

      Don't you READ before posting?

  10. Who said " tell Vad, that he would have more flexibility after November's election to deal with contentious issues"?
    Hint: it wasn't Trump!

    1. It wasn't JAMES COMEY either.

      Now why don't you come back and tell us your impression of HIM as you were SUPPOSED to do in the first place?

  11. ____ IT HAS BEEN EVER THUS ____

    The nature of Establishment protects
    Itself from upstarts seeking sweeping change.
    A groundswell of rebellion projects
    A threat to those whose dully narrow range

    Will seek to serve itself with instincts feral
    Concerned with naught but selfish interests bared
    Caring not that Principle’s in peril
    By selfish drones and not by those who’ve dared

    To challenge each smug wasted senile oaf
    Who’s long outlived his usefulness yet clings
    To power as ‘twere a Divine Right to loaf
    Thwarting those who hope that Freedom rings

    Again to rouse the blighted land
    ‘Gainst tyranny once more to raise its hand

    ~ FreeThinke

  12. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    1. Miss Piss Pot, you display objectionable characteristics in your relentless series of grtuitous assaults on this and other blogs. However, like most raging fanatics of your kind you seem blissfully unaware of your own faults, and must, therefore, be regarded more as an objectof pity than contempt.

      No one could POSSIBLY be as STUPID as you appear, Miss Piss Pot, so we have no alternative but to credit you with an astonishing degree of sheer MALEVOLENCE teetering on the brink of TREASON.


If we WERE what you and your cohorts in criminal insanity so fervently want to BELIEVE we are, YOU and all your rotten, stinking, disloyal, disreputable, ungrateful kind would have been rounded up, put in concentration camps, brutally tortured, then systematically EXTERMINATED.

      Instead you are free to POLLUTE every space you enter, and our only defense against your disgusting incursions is either to delete you, or to tell you what you are, and make fun of you.

      You are, needless to say, a pathetic excuse for a human being,

  13. Don't get me wrong. IF the Russians or anyone else hacked e-mails, then it's illegal and should be investigated and dealt with on that basis. BUT THEY DIDN’T! Nor did it in any way invalidate the results of the election!
    However, what was done when the Black Panthers were CAUGHT intimidating people at the voting polls?
    Or don’t that count!

    And by the way, was Putin, or the Russians also responsible for Bernie Sanders not winning the primary? Or was that the Democrat’s doing?
    Hillary didn’t lose the Bernie Sanders supporters because the Rooskies ratted-out the DNC.

    Hillary lost Bernie Sanders supporters because the DNC had stacked the deck against Bernie, and once again stabbed ole Bernie in his back, so hard that he didn’t even swark . So were was FBI Director James Comey then, why didn’t they investigate the DNC or Interfering in a Presidential Election?? Or aren’t the Liberal’s concerned about that? Huh all you Lil Eisenstein's!

  14. What is the Liberal’s/ Progressive’s/ Democrat’s goal in attacking President Trump?
    What do Democrats think they will accomplish?
    Do they think there is some magical solution that would replace President Trump With Hillary?
    They want to hold up Gorsuch confirmation. Do they really think that if President Trump is impeached that Hillary will replace him (GOD FORBID!?
    Seems to me the democrats are proving they are the real obstructionists in DC. They care more about themselves then they do about us.
    Every time President Trump speaks, the left-wing snowflakes fall to pieces and scream that he is "lying". And ever time he has been vindicated in the end.
    And can someone, anyone explain this ? Where was the when the Black Panthers were intimidating the Voters at the polling sites ? Did the Russians mess with electronic ballots. where they having secret Russian meetings convincing obama supporters to vote for Hillary ? What specifically did they do to throw our election. They did less ( IF ANYTHING) then the Black Panthers did!
    And If the public ( the Voters) had known that CNN colluded with the Democrats to give Hillary the debate questions before the debate it might have made an even bigger difference, and perhaps Hillary would have lost by a larger margin.

  15. Trump Was Right. Obama Did Monitor and Disseminate Surveillance of Trump Transition!
    During the press conference House Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes revealed that the identity of Trump transition officials had been "unmasked" which is directly contradictory to the law protecting the identity of Americans in "incidental" collection of intelligence. That is a violation of law.

    In a response to this bombshell by Democrat Adam Schiff, the ranking Democrat on the Intelligence Committee, his concern wasn't for the clear violation of law highlighted by Chairman Nunes but a disappointment that this gets in the way of the Democrat's transparent attempt to create a scandal where none exists in regard to Trump's Russia ties.

    Trump was right about Obama surveillance. How far it went and how many laws were broken remain to be seen. But one thing we know: Democrats will do whatever they can to obfuscate the issue and protect whoever broke the law in service to their partisan political plans! Shocking I tell ya!

    "Russian collusion" Nice Try! It turns out that Trump was correct, again!

    1. To unmask, one would require an investigation. It looks like a lot of Trumps pals were regularly communicating with some pretty shifty characters abroad. It's a shame you don't care about that.


    2. Don't believe the leftist hype

    3. JERSEY! Please try to use legitimate terms of opprobrium and denigration such as Questionable –– Dubious –– Scurrilous –– Disreputable –– Suspicious –– Unworthy –– Tainted –– Corrupt –– Dishonorable –– Scandalous –– Infamous –– Notorious –– Ignominious, etc. when describing shitty characters in a blog post.

      It's better form.


    4. LOL! Thanks! I needed that! :)




We welcome Conversation
But without Vituperation.
If your aim is Vilification ––
Other forms of Denigration ––
Unfounded Accusation --
Determined Obfuscation ––
Alienation with Self-Justification ––


Gratuitous Displays of Extraneous Knowledge Offered Not To Shed Light Or Enhance the Discussion, But For The Primary Purpose Of Giving An Impression Of Superiority are obnoxiously SELF-AGGRANDIZING, and therefore, Subject to Removal at the Discretion of the Censor-in-Residence.

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.