Friday, July 15, 2016


Links to Headlines at lucianne.com 
News Forum Homepage

Death celebrates Bastille Day in Nice, France


84 dead. 202 wounded, so far. 
See breaking headline at top of site 
for up to date information.

MORE from the BRITISH PRESS

http://www.express.co.uk/news/...

Dead bodies litter Promenade d'anglais, Nice, France
after truck mows down spectators for a full mile.
The driver, whose name was Mohammed, 

was shot dead, thank God.



Add this to our current turmoil.

 

Hummm. Wonder whose side he's on.

 

Certainly when Obama has nearly
forgotten conflict is real.

 

Ask anyone about Haiti for openers. 
You'll get the picture.



FBI made to sign away its integrity. 
This cannot stand.

She's been waitin' a long time



 

25 comments:

  1. Unreal. Obama Invites Radical #BlackLivesMatter Leader to White House After His Arrest Last Weekend

    The message is clear. I wouldn't blame the police forces if every single officer walked away from their jobs and left us to be plundered by the wolves!

    ReplyDelete
  2. About the jihad attack in Nice, France....Islam is a death cult.

    ReplyDelete
  3. 84 dead in Nice terror truck massacre,will Obama and Hillary now call for a background check on "Truck Drivers" and ban on all trucks driven by Republicans?
    One has to wonder.

    ReplyDelete
  4. BREAKING: President Obama condemns 'horrific' truck attack in France, offers US assistance, the big question is what will he do? The last ime, he sent John Kerry there with James Taylor to sing "Youve Got A friend".
    And I don't think that helped one bit! Maybe Hillary will once again make a speach say, "she stands with France"
    That should help!
    But seriously, where is the outrage from the UN? Come to think about it, WHERE IS THE UN? WHERE ARE EVERY PEACE LOVING NATION? WHY AREN'T WE WIPING THEM OFF OF THE FACE OF THE EARTH LIKE WE SHOULD BE?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Welcome to the "new normal."

    Here's a load of shit from the once-respected "Economist:"

    "big cities in Europe and America will have to get used to a long campaign of terror in which all are targets."

    I thought only those hated Teabag Rightwing Rethuglicans stoked endless war??? Did George W. Bush, Big Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld take out the Economist editorial staff and hijack the magazine.

    Here's more pusillanimous mewling from the dhimmi turds:

    How should governments respond?

    The starting point is an awareness that terrorists set out to provoke an overreaction. They exult when politicians like Donald Trump vow to exclude Muslims from the United States; when leaders from eastern Europe say they will accept migrants from Syria only if they are Christian; or when Marine Le Pen, leader of the French National Front, compares Muslims praying in the street to the Nazi occupation.

    Such intolerance helps turn discontents into sympathisers and radicals into bombers.


    So, to prevent "peaceful" Muslims from blowing us all up, raping, stabbing and committing wholesale slaughter on us, we must acquiesce to their rotten freakshow "culture," while simultaneously silencing our church bells and quashing all criticism of global toxic sewer sludge spill known as islam? GOT THAT?

    Here's more from the little Euro lapdogs who in the face of radical islam shiver and piss themselves like inbred showdogs:

    Equally, IS rejoices when Western countries dwell on scores of people dying at home rather than the hundreds of Muslims killed by bombs in Beirut and Turkey or the millions mouldering in refugee camps and suffering in Syria’s civil war. Policy should aim to split radicals off, not force the mainstream into their arms.

    So, the clear solution, according to the globalist appeasers, is to ignore such attacks as one ignores the monkeyshines of an annoying toddler pulling the cat's tail or running in the house.

    This is the pathetic whine of a sick old man who has been mugged and stabbed and left to die in the gutter in a pool of his own piss and blood.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I couldn't agree more, but in future PLEASE try to tone down the sarcasm and try even harder, if you will, to curb the excessive use of vulgarity. It detracts from the seriousness of your statement, and mars the credibility of your otherwise-excellent analysis.

      Delete
    2. Sir,
      My apologies, but fresh from reading the Economist article, I was enraged. I shall check my language in the future.

      Delete
    3. The Economist is off the rails.

      Delete
  6. NOTICE: You MUST address SPECIFIC elements in the POST, or your comments WILL be REMOVED.

    This is NOT a City Dump, a Public Toilet or an Open Sewer. Neither is it Hyde Park Corner.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I don't think the headlines screaming above delve deeply enough into the real issues behind the current malaise afflicting the planet. But they certainly encapsulate succinctly the screaming coming from the MSM as it tries to herd the sheeple into a uni-voiced and uni-browed freak show of solidarity to its deeper aims.

    There are a couple of headlines above that should be probed by any independent free thinker, if such an animal still exists today. Can the country and the world screw up the courage to really probe the depths of what exactly happened on September 11, 2001? A day the world changed and has only preceded to to get worse.

    Personally I find it hard to believe that any pretense at conducting a "war on terror" could possibly be genuine when this war embraces Saudi Arabia being an "ally in the war on terror". This is the one Muslim country that overtly finances and exports the most radical, violent and and extreme forms of Islam—Wahhabism.

    Not only that, but if one accepts at face value the "Official" tale of the 8-11 attacks the attackers were supposedly mostly carrying Saudi Arabian passports. Ergo, I am most interested in seeing the idea embraced that there would be an official inquiry into the "official" story of that day of infamy.And let the chips fall where they may ...

    The constant drum beat and official propaganda campaign being undertaken by the administration and their main stream media whores demonizing Syria should also be officially and deeply probed. That country has been destabilized in a deliberate military-type endeavor to destroy it, even though, or perhaps because it's an enemy of Wahhabist Saudi Arabia.

    Virginia State Senator Richard Black:

    "The Senator asserted that the war on Syria was not caused by domestic unrest, saying “It was an unlawful war of aggression by foreign powers determined to force a puppet regime on Syria. General Wesley Clark, former Supreme Allied Commander Europe, revealed that by 2001, Western powers had developed plans to overthrow Syria. Yet after fifteen years, of military subversion, NATO, Saudi Arabia and Qatar still cannot identify a single leader who enjoys popular support among the Syrian people.”

    “Foreign powers have no right to overturn legitimate elections and impose their will on the Syrian people. Syrians alone must determine their destiny, free of foreign intervention. I am disappointed that the UN has turned a blind eye to the unlawful interference in Syria’s internal affairs,” he added."

    Sounds liked a minority of one ... one sane American politician.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Telling it like it is!July 15, 2016 at 12:38 PM

    "Donald Trump calls himself a winner, but nobody wants to speak at his convention. It wasn’t a surprise that Tebow bailed on Trump. He has a job at ESPN, and being associated with the toxic pit of division that is Donald Trump would certainly not be good for the squeaky clean right-wing evangelical image that Tebow has spent years building.

    It turns out that Tim Tebow is just like much of the Republican Party. He is supporting Trump, but refusing to speak for him at the convention. Trump wanted sports superstars at his convention, but it turns out that he couldn’t even get washed up Tim Tebow."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. BADA BING! The self proclaimed winnah is a headin for the biggest LOSS evah!

      Delete
    2. Hildahag CramptoonJuly 15, 2016 at 2:17 PM

      You're damn right! If you don't hold the correct political views, you will lose your job!

      The twitter shitters and the lumpen proletariat will dogpile you and drive you from the public arena!!!

      You will be castigated, hated and SILENCED!!!

      THAT is the Progressive Way is Obama's Progressive Amreeka!

      Delete
    3. YUP! As I've already said hundreds of times:

      _____ PROGRESSIVISM is TYRANNISM _____

      Delete
  9. Long Distance RuinerJuly 15, 2016 at 2:10 PM

    The liberal loons are really howling over Trump picking Pence!

    The libturds hate Trump and they hate Pence even more, which is a ringing endorsement to normal and right thinking people.

    The mouth-breathing fart tokers at regressive erections are collapsing from carbon dioxide poisoning they got their heads so far up... !!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They would have a hissy fit no matter WHO he chose.

      That's what they DO –– Have HISSY FITS.

      I keep hoping they'll eventually do a Rumpelstiltskin, but Alas! so far no luck.

      Delete
  10. The Liberal Loons are going NUTS now that Trump is either tied or ahead of the lying Scumbag..

    ReplyDelete
  11. Myron CrumschitzJuly 15, 2016 at 6:40 PM

    Trump's GOP is holding the line with their platform. No to gay marriage, no to gay rights, no recognition of transgendered heroes.

    Observers thought they might remove their disapproval of women driving, working outside the home and wearing dungarees, but hardliners fought successfully to keep those planks in.

    The GOP is also still opposed to:
    Color TV
    Moving Pictures
    Children being seen as well as heard
    Fluoridated water
    Playing cards
    Picante sauce

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Very funny! Thank you. You know I love satire.

      I've been told on good authority that they never have sex with the lights on either, and would eagerly pass a law against it, but for the impracticability of enforcement.

      Delete
    2. Myron CrumschitzJuly 15, 2016 at 9:23 PM

      You're a good sport, FreeThinke.

      Wasn't it you relating the story of how the Queen Mother (God rest her soul) cautioned a young Queen Elizabeth on her wedding night, "Don't turn over, dear. He's Greek, you know."

      Delete
    3. I believe it was. How incredible that you remembered such a hoary old joke. Both Phillip and Elizabeth are in their NINETIES now, and I remember all the hubbub about their WEDDING and then her CORONATION.

      Did I tell you the Honor/Offer joke?

      Philip was unsure as to how to approach his Royal bride on their wedding night, so he asked the advice of Winston Churchill.

      Churchill said, 'There's nothing to it, my boy, you simply ask her, "May I have the honor?" She's been well-trained, so she's bound to respond, "I thank you for the offer." And from that point on it should be on her and off her throughout the rest of the night."

      };^)>

      Delete
    4. There's a follow up to the "Don't Turn Over story, that may amuse you:

      Elizabeth and Phillip had been married for well over a year, and obedient girl that she was Elizabeth kept politely refusing to turn over, just as her mightier had advised, whenever Phillip suggested it.

      Eventually Phillip became frustrated, and finally asked her point blank, "My dear, don't you ever want to have children?"

      Delete
  12. BLM aren’t Like MLK, They are More Like the KKK.

    ReplyDelete
  13. It will be hard for Mrs. Clinton to escape her past. It will sink her hopes for the presidency.

    ReplyDelete

IF YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND THE FOLLOWING, YOU DON'T BELONG HERE, SO KINDLY GET OUT AND STAY OUT.

We welcome Conversation
But without Vituperation.
If your aim is Vilification ––
Other forms of Denigration ––
Unfounded Accusation --
Determined Obfuscation ––
Alienation with Self-Justification ––
We WILL use COMMENT ERADICATION.


IN ADDITION

Gratuitous Displays of Extraneous Knowledge Offered Not To Shed Light Or Enhance the Discussion, But For The Primary Purpose Of Giving An Impression Of Superiority are obnoxiously SELF-AGGRANDIZING, and therefore, Subject to Removal at the Discretion of the Censor-in-Residence.