Wednesday, July 13, 2016

Do you agree, or do you just see this 
as wishful thinking on the part 
of diehard Conservatives?


52 comments:

  1. The FBI splatted her, but she toweled off quickly.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Cora Witherspoon said

    I honestly don't know what to think anymore, do you? All I know is that nothing I learned as a child seems too apply nowadays. The cartoon is supposed to be funny, I guess, but the person above me is probably right. The truth doesn't matter when it comes to Hillary. What did they do, put a drug in the water that makes people forget the difference between right and wrong?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Telling it like it isJuly 13, 2016 at 9:41 AM

    Only an irrational and or blind partisan could Not see the Racism in President Obama's remarks. A speech Full of Slanted opinions and and, most importantly, a speech full of Bull-Shit.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Unless you can cite specific examples from the speech, your opinion carries no weight. You're just blowing off steam.

      Delete
  4. Telling it like it isJuly 13, 2016 at 9:48 AM

    Obama hates White America and he hates anybody with a different perspective than his. Obama is a racist at heart."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That may be true. Considering his background, which is 100% pro-Communist, anti-Capitalist, pro-Muslim, pro-Black Liberation Theology, an anti-Christian, anti-Caucasian, anti-American ideology I'd be surprised if he were anything else. He referred to one of his grandmothers as "a typical white person," though she was married to a Communist and thus a SWORN ENEMY of everything that has guided Americans, and everything true Americans hold dear.

      HOWEVER, you shouldn't just say "Obama is a racist," without giving at least as many reasons to think so, as I just have. We must constantly present EVIDENCE to back up our pinions, if we expect to be taken seriously.

      But THIS post was about Hillary's recent encounter with the FBI. Wha tdid you think of THAT?

      Delete
    2. Who the Hell is Hilary?

      Delete
  5. Just Telling it like it is.July 13, 2016 at 9:57 AM

    This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Okay. ENOUGH!

      Either stick to the subject of the post, or please refrain from commenting.

      Thank you.

      Delete
  6. Sadly Ive eaten here a number of times and have yet to be impressed.. Tthe first time I ate there I thought it going to be a winner, but it was not to be.. But as the times went by I was convinced this was not going to be the culinarily experience that I had hoped for. .
    The atmosphere is kind of dull and simpel . Nothing to write home about but you suspect a bit more ambiance, then what it was.. I didn't expect it to be much, but it was even less than expected.There was no appeal to it at all.
    OK, to the food The food was a bit more than just Ok, and far from the best Ive had either.. You've seen places like this one in every neighborhood, good but no where near excepional.
    Our order was simple and the service was very slow and took a very long time to be delivered.. The place was preety much full, and perhaps that was reason for the semi-quality, and the extreamly slowness of the service. This may have been acceptable. I had to retuen our dishes because they wern't cooked properly.
    The waiters were friendly but rushed.. and although we gave our waiter directions on how we wanted our order cooked, it wasn't.

    ReplyDelete
  7. The cartoon is way off base. The cartoonist forgot to include Hellary's government-issued bullet-proof, teflon umbrella deflecting all the mud

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You will LOVE the video I have lined up thanks to FJ-Thersites' relentless YouTube research. It will be showcased here in the next day or two.

      Delete
  8. There are three groups to consider in answering this question. Hillary supporters, Hillary detractors, and neutral bystanders. As the latter category are oblivious to daily news events, they'll be influenced by the spin spun by the members of the two former categories, come November. So the answer has GOT to be, we'll find out come November! ;)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No one could possibly argue against that opinion, Thersites.

      Delete
  9. The National Memo's Of Hilary Clinton's VP possibilitiea
    Pocahontas. Aka Lizzy "Borden" Warron
    Can you believe it? Not one Idiot in the Ehite House, but Two
    Likelihood of Her being the choice ..2 or 3 %
    Relationship to White House:She one had a Pow Wow on the White House Lawn.
    Biggest Strength: she does the best Rain Dance of anyone else in Washington.
    Biggest Weakness: She never did a Rain Dance that worked.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hellary's got the black vote locked up, so she'll go for the Big Enchilada HisPander and pick one of the Castro Brothers.

      Her witch coven staff is still debating whether it will be Raul or Fidel.

      Delete
    2. A constitutionally impossible but still amusing thought, Juan.

      };-^)>

      Delete
  10. Telling it like it isJuly 13, 2016 at 12:09 PM

    Hillary claims She is “not in the pocket of anyone” Right After Receiving $6 Million from George Soros

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And what about the more-than 100-million Bill and Hillary
      received from Goldman Sachs?

      Does no believe anymore that "Where' there's SMOKE, there's FIRE?

      Surely the Clintons deserve to be dubbed The KING and KWEEN of CORRUPTION, don't you think?

      Delete
  11. Telling it like it is.July 13, 2016 at 12:19 PM

    Anyone who thinks that the Black Lives Matter movement is a " peaceful organization is insane Any gang of people chanting "Pigs in a Blanket, Fry 'em Like Bacon" or other catchy tunes calling for the death of cops, is far from peaceful in my eyes.
    But I guess that Obama sees things differently .

    ReplyDelete
  12. Telling it like it is.July 13, 2016 at 12:27 PM

    President Obama used his Tuesday address at a Dallas memorial for five slain police officers to warn that racism persists across the country, and said "none of us is entirely innocent" or immune, "including our police departments."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Telling it like it isJuly 13, 2016 at 12:30 PM

      Here are the seven worst moments of his latest opportunistic, highly political, egregiously inappropriate address:

      1. Equating The Murders of The Dallas Police Officers With The Killings of Alton Sterling And Philando Castile. This is a trap into which the left has fallen consistently this week. It’s lazy thinking, and more importantly, it’s morally repugnant. The police officers murdered in Dallas were targeted because of their race. We know that for a fact. That is not speculation. They were targeted because they were white. We know virtually nothing about the Alton Sterling and Philando Castile cases. The police allege that Sterling resisted arrest and reached for a gun he was carrying illegally. We have no evidence yet as to what happened with Philando Castile, but there is certainly no evidence that it was a racially-motivated shooting. Nonetheless, Obama said, “I see people who mourn for the five officers we lost, but also weep for the families of Alton Sterling and Philando Castile. In this audience, I see what’s possible.” Not all killings are equal. But to Obama, targeted killing of whites is equivalent to police killing blacks in disputed circumstances.

      2. Suggesting That Today’s Police Departments Are Still Rife With The Legacies of Slavery And Jim Crow. The year is now 2016. Arrest statistics match up precisely with crime report statistics. There is no evidence of systemic discrimination against minorities. But that didn’t stop Obama from stating, “We also know that centuries of racial discrimination, of slavery, and subjugation, and Jim Crow; they didn’t simply vanish with the law against segregation…we know that bias remains. We know it, whether you are black, or white, or Hispanic, or Asian, or native American, or of Middle Eastern descent, we have all seen this bigotry in our own lives at some point. We’ve heard it at times in our own homes….No institution is entirely immune, and that includes our police departments. We know this.” Remember, Obama isn’t just wrong here – he’s saying this in front of the families of officers killed by a black anti-cop, anti-white racist. Despicable.

      Delete
  13. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Seeing how you dance on a string like a trained monkey puppet for all the lefties who pat you on your tiny flat head, you are an expert in the matter, douchebag.

      Delete
    2. Sorry, Biff, but we are trying very hard to keep this an ASSHOLE-FREE ZONE. The person you addressed is one the most putrid, most devious, most disgusting examples of the genre on the internet –– not only a bilious blowhard but a complete phony and a particularly nasty snake-in-the-grass as well.

      We like you, Biff, but strongly advise you please not to respond to characters of this despicable ilk when visiting us in future.


      Thanks.

      Delete
  14. Hillary, Bill Clinton, and Lorretta Lynch, are about S innocent as OJ. Simpson.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And a resounding SEVENFOLD AMEN is hereby issued to BIFF!

      Delete
  15. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. NO TATTLING about what is said at OTHER blogs, PLEASE.

      It is a childish, highly destruct practice. I'm sorry but we can't allow it here, since it serves no useful purpose. All it ever does is add fuel to the fire and fan the flames to increase their power to maim and destroy.

      Delete
  16. PS....Bernie Sanders is a hyp·o·crite.
    And Hillary Clinton is a Lying Crook

    ReplyDelete
  17. What the Community Organizer said to the Nation was a Black Activists Speech ment for a Black Lives Matter Rally,,, NOT a Memorial Service. It was a Disgraceful and Shameful Ideologue Diatribe. And the entire nation is ashamed of him.. Well almost the entire nation. The screwballs are proud of him.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It didn't start out that way, Anita, but he did just what James Comey did the other day. He started by making an eloquent case for supporting what's right, good, and proper, then switched gears and ended by neutralizing and virtually denying everything he'd said before.

      As my grandmother used to say, "Why that man is no better than a cow who delivers a nice full bucket of milk, then kicks it over before you can take into the dairy.

      Grandmother was quite a gal. you would have loved her. She sure knew what was right and what wasn't, but always kept a sense of humor about everything she experienced, God bless her!

      Delete
  18. No she heard 100 % clearly as most Americans did.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Please come back, and tell us what you really meant to say. As it stands your comment makes no sense.

      Delete
    2. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      Delete
    3. You should know that the despicable person you named is FORBIDDEN to post here.

      His remarks will ALWAYS be JETTISONED on contact, so the less said ABOUT him the better.

      And of course, there will be no point whatever in responding TO him should any of his unwelcome assaults on our spa escape our vigilance for a while. After all, we can't be on guard ALL the time.

      That is why we go into moderation more often than we'd prefer. It must be that way, until Blogger provides us with the power to EXCLUDE chronic site pests.

      Delete
    4. He should be Forbidden snd he IS despicable !

      Delete
    5. Of course, but THE LESS SAID ABOUT IT, the BETTER, comprenez-vous?

      Delete
  19. Replies
    1. And ain't that a mercy?

      Regards,

      Gene Poole

      Delete
  20. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sorry, but the subject of the post is the fallout from Hillary versus The FBI, NOT Obama's funerary oration.

      Besides, we do not like –– and very rarely accept –– BOILERPLATE.

      Delete
  21. There’s a war in America right now. The rage is at a boiling point. Angry blacks have declared war on law enforcement officers sparking a nationwide spree of violence against cops. They have also declared open season on white people in general. It’s insane.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I tend to agree, but I'm much more interested in your ideas in the effect a President Hillary Clinton is likely to have on resolving that issue satisfactorily?

      This post IS about HRC after all.

      Would you care to opine?

      Delete
  22. Replies
    1. A NEW YORKER article?

      Please, don't make us laugh.

      That rag turned into a full-fledged organ of high-flown, erudite-but-poisonous Communist Propaganda years ago.

      I wouldn't use it for toilet paper today for fear of the corrosive effect it might have in my tender anal issues

      Delete
  23. Re: Justice Ginsburg, upsetting people by taking a stance against Donald Trump
    People, including all those media enablers, are still in denial about the fact--fact, I say--that Trump is a disgrace to the human race, an outlier, a clear and present danger to this country, and to the world. The choice between Trump and Clinton does not reflect the usual sort of options. She has not only the right but the obligation to call Trump by name. If she stands out for doing so, it is not on her. It's on the rest of us. He has no business, none at all, on the national political stage.

    Even Hillsry is a better choice than him. And that's saying something

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Your statement is absurd.

      A JUDGE –– especially a SUPREME COURT Justice –– may have a perfect right to her PRIVATE opinion, and certainly a perfect to VOTE any way she chooses, but members of The Supreme Court have an almost sacred obligation to remain absolutely NON-PARTISAN in their public stance on current events.

      What she has just done will undoubtedly call into question the INTEGRITY of all SOCTUS decisions in which she participates in the foreseeable future.

      Her, I think unprecedented action, has COMPROMISED the ENTIRE Supreme Court, ij my judgment has provided more-than-sufficient grounds to sue for her IMPEACHMENT.

      However, I don't favor that at this point for what-should-be obvious reasons.

      Delete
  24. ATTENTION BLM: You claim that black lives matter. Yet you do absolutely NOTHING about the gangs (Crips, Bloods and other predominantly black gangs) who have been murdering each other for decades. Enlighten us as to why you have not spent a single second protesting that!! Prove to the rest of America that you have the ability to give an honest and intelligent reply to this enquiry. Prove to us all that you have an IQ greater than a grapefrui

    ReplyDelete
  25. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete

IF YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND THE FOLLOWING, YOU DON'T BELONG HERE, SO KINDLY GET OUT AND STAY OUT.

We welcome Conversation
But without Vituperation.
If your aim is Vilification ––
Other forms of Denigration ––
Unfounded Accusation --
Determined Obfuscation ––
Alienation with Self-Justification ––
We WILL use COMMENT ERADICATION.


IN ADDITION

Gratuitous Displays of Extraneous Knowledge Offered Not To Shed Light Or Enhance the Discussion, But For The Primary Purpose Of Giving An Impression Of Superiority are obnoxiously SELF-AGGRANDIZING, and therefore, Subject to Removal at the Discretion of the Censor-in-Residence.