Thursday, November 14, 2013


OUR FABULOUS FIRST LADY

A Photo Essay 

Accompanied by Automated Anagrams



Halal Be Commie, A Camel Lib Home 
Baa Commie Hell, Label Ha Commie 
Cable Imam Hole, Label Imam Echo 
Liable Mocha Me, Blah Ale Commie



Mambo Leach Lie, Blame Malice Ho 
Ameba Loci Helm, Labial Come Hem 
Amoebic Ma Hell, Mamba Lice Hole 
Able Malice Ohm, Becalm Email Ho 



Mocha Meal Bile, Cabal Hole Mime 
Embalm Ache Oil , Amicable Hem Lo 
Bleach Imam Ole 




Lab Malice Home 



Me Claimable Ho


Editorial Post Script:
It's disappointing –– but by no means surprising –– to see how dangled bait almost invariably creates a feeding frenzy –– especially when the bait is putrid.








150 comments:

  1. Within a few weeks of Michele Obama's wearing that outfit depicted in the the second photo in the body of this blog post, one of my students -- the daughter of a federal prosecutor -- showed up for a debate round dressed almost identically. I kid you not!

    When the girl was reprimanded for improper dress, her parents got irate. They enrolled the girl elsewhere for the next school term.

    First Ladies do not have to wear stodgy clothes, but they should remember that what they wear often serves as role model for women and girls.

    Now, I have seen Michelle Obama wear some beautiful outfits and look very dignified -- particularly during and beyond the last year of her husband's first term in office. A learning curve? Something else?

    PS: Some of the outfits that Michelle Obama has worn would have been derided if a GOP First Lady has dressed in that manner. Really.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I don't understand the extremists on the right's obsession with Michelle Obama. Anyone at any time can find unflattering photos of famous people, even beautiful famous people. To put these up as an example of Mrs. Obama is mean-spirited.

    I'm fairly sure Mrs. Obama has never said a nasty word about the host of this blog. In fact, all she's done in her role as First Lady is what every other First Lady has done.

    To mock her, to show her in the most unflattering photos is to try to demean, humiliate, and otherwise "put her in her place."

    To what purpose?

    Her husband is fair game for those who wish to criticize him. What Mrs. Obama does as First Lady does you no harm.

    As for her fashion choices, I don't know a woman on this planet who hasn't shown up in an outfit she now regrets. As AOW noted, Mrs. Obama is doing much better. But I do give her props for her adventurous choices in the past--the failures and the successes.

    A few days ago, Silverfiddle wrote a blog about the lack of kindness in today's blogsphere.

    It appears he wasted his time.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Oh boy, this is going to bring the Michelle-hating droolers out of the woodwork.

    I will say that it is an apt riposte to Shaw Kenawe's little project where she played the silly anagram game, flagrantly fawned over the First Lady and then censored everyone who didn't join her in bowing down in worship to the altar of Obama.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Dear Mr. Tit:

    Don't you have anything worthwhile going on in your life? Is that the reason you so closely followed and analyzed what I said on my blog? Frequent visitor, are you?



    My anagram post was about Ann Coulter who makes a living by insulting, denigrating, and demeaning people.

    Michelle Obama does not.

    That you can't tell the difference between mocking a political hack who mocks others for a living and maligning America's First Lady just for the fun of being disrespectful shows me, at the least, that there's a bit more that informs your dislike of this woman than just her questionable fashion choices.

    I wonder what that might be.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Miss Kenawe,

    I don't spend much time dwelling on pop culture, so I have no opinion on the First Lady.

    I do congratulate you on the Coulter piece. That coupled with your obsessive bordering on creepy fawning over Mrs. Obama was a brilliant piece of passive-aggressive rightwing bug zapping.

    Lure them in, then send their comments to oblivion.

    Bravo! Well played.

    And the name is Titcombe, Madam. Are you an eight-year old who titters at titles that titillate?

    I've been around awhile, so I'm used to it.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Shaw, You are much kinder in your response to this idiocy and obsession (on the part of some) with the First Lady that I would be. I'll leave it at that.

    ReplyDelete
  7. For the Juveniles in the crowd who think it funny to titter at surnames that cause the mind to wander:

    Origins of the name Titcombe

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Your point is? Seeing how I did not refer to you by name and my comment was general in nature Mr. Titcombe.

      Delete
  8. Oh Deah, Mr. Titcombe,

    I do not wish to offend, but I find it curious that you're chagrined at my playful use of your name, but remained loudly silent at this play on the First Lady's name, under a photo of her:

    Me Claimable Ho

    It would take a first-class lunkhead not to understand what that is implying about the African-American woman who currently resides in the White House.

    Your indignation, Mr. Titcombe, seems a tad narcissistic. No one impugned your moral values by toying with your name as the photo with the "Ho" designation does to the First Lady of the United States of America.

    No First Lady, Republican, Democrat, or anyone, deserves this sort of disrespect. Coyly implying but not having the guts to come out and actually say, that she's a "whore." As I've stated, only a lunkhead would pretend that wasn't meant as a slur on Mrs. Obama.


    There is no accounting for taste these days.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Shaw Kenawe said...

    Don't you have anything worthwhile going on in your life? Is that the reason you so closely followed and analyzed what I said on my blog? Frequent visitor, are you?

    --------------------------

    What? You don't like people visiting your blog? You don't like... what is the word... lurkers?

    Must everyone who visits comment?

    Perhaps you are saying that everyone who visits your site and comments have nothing "worthwhile" going on in their lives?

    My, my. Do your friend who visit you daily realize the low esteem you hold them in?

    I detect an unhealthy level of bile and contempt for your fellow man. Quite odd in someone who chooses to blog. Enjoy rolling out the red carpet, and then yanking it out from under unsuspecting visitors, do you?

    I must go back to your comment about people who visit you having nothing "worthwhile" going on in their lives.

    Praise heavens none of your visitors pay Mr. FreeThinke a call. What would they think of you? I would go to your blog and comment there, but form prior experience, I realize how futile it would be trying to get past the censors.

    You can call me Mort

    ReplyDelete
  10. To put these up as an example of Mrs. Obama is mean-spirited.

    Me-OW!

    ReplyDelete
  11. Lunkhead? Oh, my. You do love vilification and the ad hominem.

    I have never, and would never, call the First Lady, or any woman, a 'HO.' It's not gentlemanly.

    Of Mr. FreeThinke's artistry, my favorites were Halal Be Commie and
    Baa Commie Hell.

    This is all in good fun. Taking such frivolities so seriously is tiresome to those around you. There is fun to be had outside the confines of the dictates of leftwing political correctness. Even Ann Coulter gets off a good one every now and then.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Joe: Bravo! Exquisite find.

    To Miss Shaw: Pot, meet Kettle.

    Mort

    ReplyDelete
  13. One more thing, Miss Shaw,

    I did enjoy your post where you and other extreme liberals savaged a fellow extreme liberal for his cartoonish characterization of what conservatives must think of New York's new socialist mayor.

    Funny stuff, that.

    If you wish people to stop visiting you blog, you must tone down the humor.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Dear Mr. Titcombe,

    Your comments never addressed the subject of this post, which purpose is meant to denigrate, mock, and disrespect the FLOTUS.

    It has nothing to do with me, my blog, or people who do or do not comment there, or, for that matter, what I've written in the past.

    You are employing a favorite device of politicians who can't defend themselves: Change the subject, redirect, and talk about the person asking the questions. It's called evasion. And it's what people who can't defend the indefensible use to deflect responsibility.


    Mrs. Obama is a devoted wife and mother who has comported herself with dignity as befits a First Lady.

    The sniping and insults aimed at this woman are a means to put her in her place, if you know what I mean, not to be humorous. Why show a photo of her backside and then place the words, "Me Claimable Ho" under it? Except to insult, slur, slander, malign, defame, smear, and kick to the gutter a woman whom a certain group of people believe is not worthy to be in the White House.





    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well stated Shaw. You nailed both Mr. Titcombe's tactics and the motive of this post.

      Well Done!

      Delete
  15. Good grief, Joe Conservative, if you don't understand the difference between Sarah Palin, a politician and teevee talker, and the First Lady of the United States, then I can't help you. The comparison doesn't work, sir. Mrs. Obama isn't running for office.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Miss Shaw,

    Defend myself? From what, pray tell?

    Changing the subject? Hardly. It is quite amusing. You scream in outrage when someone throws darts at your sacred cows, yet you engage in the same activities. It's silly. Ms. Palin is also a devoted wife and mother.

    Do you watch The Daily Show or Colbert, by chance?

    It's called humor. Some more tasteless than others. Perhaps due to your hyper-sensitive state, you are overreacting? Sometimes, my dear, a cigar is just a cigar.

    -- Mort

    ReplyDelete
  17. "if you don't understand the difference between Sarah Palin, a politician and teevee talker, and the First Lady of the United States"

    ----------------------

    Difference? They are both human beings.

    ReplyDelete
  18. No AOW, none of the outfits FLOTUS has worn would be derided if they were worn by GOP first ladies, because the criticisms of Ms Obama have come primarily from far right conservatives.

    Do you really think they would be critical of one of their own?

    I have heard conservatives actually say first ladies never got involved in politics before Ms Obama and should just be quiet and not talk about issues, like they used to.

    The criticism toward this woman, who had the gall to try and take on childhood obesity has been over the top.

    Why weren't conservatives telling Laura Bush to shut up that parents had a right to keep their kids illiterate if they chose?

    Why were conservatives and libertarians telling nancy reagan to shut up about drugs because people had a right to do whatever they wanted with their kids?

    Why is it that parents only know best for their kids when there is a Dem as first lady?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Because Dave, as I have come to realize, some conservatives don't think about consistency nor do they care about it. It is more about the template and partisan ideology.

      To be fair and balanced it must be noted the same can be said of some progressives.

      Delete
  19. Free, as one who has publicly decried the idiocy of the net, and the inability of bloggers to talk about anything of substance, and as educated adults, what is the purpose of your post?

    It seems to me to be nothing more than to mock someone.

    You frequently claim to be trying to follow Christ's teachings... how does this fit it?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good question Dave. I am not a practicing Christian being an atheist, but I have read both the Old Testament and the New Testament.

      The obvious answer to your question IMO is... It doesn't fit it at all.

      Delete
  20. Now, now, Mr. Titcombe (or is it Radical Redneck?), why so much animosity toward the first lady?

    What has she done that has everyone so up tight, suggested that kids exercise and eat healthier? Man, that stuff;s straight out of Gramsci.

    I'm sure you can see the difference between the public persona of Michelle Obama and a low functional hate monger like Coulter who exists to spew venom or a political aspirant like Palin who has the brains of a hammer.

    Myself, if people listen to the first lady and throw in a little more exercise and a more nutritious diet then it's a win.

    Following Coulter and Palin, not so much.

    Are you sure you aren't Radical Redneck? Or maybe we should call you the Cowardly Lion, er Chicken.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I will not resort to your level and write the name that I would call YOU

      Delete
  21. The Truth Will Set Your FeetNovember 14, 2013 at 12:51 PM

    Screw the Fat slob and the rest of the dickhead progressives who go bunkers over her.

    ReplyDelete
  22. TheTruth Will Set Your FeetNovember 14, 2013 at 12:58 PM

    Sarah Palin knows more about politics and the American way of life then that big ass, "fashioneaste" fart-face, will ever know.

    ReplyDelete
  23. A pissed off Good looking American Women.November 14, 2013 at 1:01 PM

    Great blog FT.
    Keep up the good work.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Ms. Shaw, like it or not, I personally don't give a damn, but it's my right to "mock" anyone I please, be it The First Moocher, YOU, or anyone else.
    So either suck it up or don't . Who cares?

    ReplyDelete
  25. I find it to be very odd that the anti Semitic Lester aka National fart face is so quick to defend the wicked witch.

    ReplyDelete
  26. It is said, IMNHO, that a man of your talent and intelligence attracts low information and low intelligent individuals like RR, TTWSYF, APOGLAW, and others.

    But it certainly isn't all that surprising when you post crap like this which encourages a certain threatened and hateful class to visy.

    I fully support free speech.and the expression of diverse political views and beliefs. But posts such as this one is not about that and we both know that Free Thinke.

    ReplyDelete
  27. I hold no animosity towards the First Lady and I have expressed none toward her on these pages, so I don't understand Mr. Ducky's comments.

    I don't understand Rational Nation's either, since I never directed any comments towards him.

    What I did do, in my first comment was to give a nod to Mr. FreeThinke's response to Miss Kenawe's passive-aggressive rightwing zapping.

    As a longtime observer, but never a blog host, I thought that was what blogging was all about.

    Progressives talk about having a sense of humor, but they rarely display any.

    ReplyDelete
  28. RN... it seems that Free's post has resulted in exactly what he decried in June...

    Probably because he set this up himself.

    "The atmosphere throughout the blogosphere is malignant. It is bound to have a deleterious effect on our health both mental and physical, if we remain involved with it much longer. The blogs have become nothing but a repository for childish hatred, extreme cynicism, insolence, bilious rhetoric, malevolence, spite, and lunacy.

    What we have learned about human nature through this experience is frankly horrifying. The recent spate of moronic hate mail in response to our efforts to foster an atmosphere of amity, comity, relative sanity and good humor has been enough to gag a maggot.

    More and more we feel soiled by this process.

    There have been a small handful who've shown understanding, kindness, appreciation and support, and for them we shall always be thankful, but a small handful is not enough to warrant our continuing to pour effort into an obvious exercise in futility.

    Our best efforts here have been largely ignored –– or perverted by willful misunderstanding.

    Only a seriously ill person would continue to drink from an open sewer on a daily basis.

    We wish you well, as we retire to pray our country may one day begin to grow and prosper mentally, morally, culturally and spiritually once again. "


    It is too bad that some, like Anon, choose not to act in a civilized way, even when they disagree with someone.

    There is always a way to disagree agreeably, if we choose to take that road.



    ReplyDelete
  29. Mr. Rational Nation,

    "Well stated Shaw. You nailed both Mr. Titcombe's tactics and the motive of this post."

    Do you work for Miss Kenawe? That was some beautiful sucking up.

    Now, tell us, what vile 'tactics' did I employ? Contextualizing the conversation? Not adhering to progressive strictures? Failing to faint in horror at the lampooning of one of your heroes?

    Progressives can be so stilted and stifling.

    Mort

    ReplyDelete
  30. Amen to that mort. RN is a total Suck ~ Up, to "Ms" Shaw

    ReplyDelete
  31. Mr. Mortimer Titcombe,

    First I am not a progressive.

    Secondly I do not work for Shaw. In fact we quite often disagree.

    Third I was not sucking up, but your statement that I do because I state a postion you disagree with might indicate you are sucking up to someone.

    Once again, you are free to express any way you like. You ate free to evade, and I duly note your continued exercise of the tactic.

    Lastly, answer how from the limited information you have you determined President or First Lady Michelle Obama are a hero of mine. Many would, and have stated my hero is Ayn Rand.

    Your evasion and shallowness certainly is on display Mr. Titcombe.

    Have a sparkling afternoon and evening Sir.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Mr. USA,
    You failed to answer my question. What "tactics" did I employ?

    I do apologize for ascribing beliefs to you that you do not hold. It must be the first time I've ever mistaken an Ayn Rand follower for a progressive!

    Egg, meet face. I do apologize.

    As I previously stated, I was giving a nod to Mr. FreeThinke for firing a rhetorical retort to Miss Kenawe's own provocations. I do hope no one here thinks I am passing judgement.

    To M. Titcombe: A cousin? I heard at one point that all Titcombe's were related.

    ReplyDelete
  33. The comparison doesn't work, sir. Mrs. Obama isn't running for office.

    lol! That's what they said about Her Heinous, Hillary von Clintoon.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Michelle is always mad because she lives with a serial liar just like hillary because she lived with a serial rapist.

    Wicked thinks michelle is off base but if she is spending our tax money to take her friends on lavish vacations and joins the campaign trail, she is fair game.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Michelle is no lady. Please refrain from referring to her as such.
    Further, she has a stylist and a makeup artist on staff. There is no excuse for her slovenly appearance.
    Remember those shoes she wore when feeding the homeless? Pure trash. Repugnant in every regard.

    Andie

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. In fact she's a Moocher!

      Delete
  36. Wicked is a Moocher fan, or. Should I say. A Moocher. Worshiper.

    ReplyDelete
  37. @DT --- Michelle is no lady. Please refrain from referring to her as such.

    ------
    Do tell why she isn't. Coming from the group that is dishing on her appearance for no good reason I would like to read the explanation.

    Myself, I think you've been sniffing the chalk paint again you funky leftist hater, you.

    ReplyDelete
  38. Skudrunner, I just love how you extrapolate from your opinion enough information to develop your premise and then declare with certainty it is absolutely correct. Remarkable indeed.

    As to the lavish vacations and excessive expense on the taxpayer’s dime, okay, that is touchable and fair game to criticize. What bothered me was the fact the President and First Lady were not aware the effect it would have on public opinion, especially in light of the lavish entertaining done for her entourage.

    Apparently the First Family was slow to learn, but apparently they have as the issue has not been brought up of late and the First Lady has been more reserved shall we say. I might add that it is not unusual for the First Family to vacation. Presidents and their families have always done so.

    However, the obvious, and IMNHO intentional, point of this post was to malign, disrespect, and create false controversy over the character of the First Lady. That is trite, childish, mean spirited, and frankly makes me embarrassed for conservatives and libertarians.

    Indeed if this is an example of what we have descended to as a political force we are lost. Not because of the fiscal issues, deficits and the national debt, the ACA, or any other domestic issue or problem. We are lost because of the character deficit we have as a political force.

    Sorry Andie, the fact you dislike that Michelle Obama is the First Lady of the United States of America does not change the fact she is. I, as a gentleman , will treat her with the respect a legitimate First Lady deserves.

    Good day , have a marvelous evening all.

    ReplyDelete
  39. Perhaps one day a reporter from the NY Times will channel his inner Big Bird!

    Naaaah! Never happen.

    ReplyDelete

  40. A primly moral pose can serve to mask
    Bilious temperament and vile conceit ––
    In fact the urge to cripple and defeat
    The one once loved now harshly brought to task.
    Counterfeit religion acts the fiend,
    Hobbling Affection’s natural course
    Overcoming love with fake remorse.
    No bliss survives when righteously demeaned.
    What makes a creepy, sickening sense of shame
    Haunt happiness as though ‘twere harlotry ––
    Even husband’s needs belong with varletry?
    Evil righteousness kills Passion’s flame.
    Let him whose pious poison mars affection
    Suffer from rebellion and rejection.


    ~ FreeThinke

    ReplyDelete
  41. Make of the above what you will. I'm absolutely positive it will be misconstrued.

    Nevertheless, I'll follow my secret heart, as I always do regardless of the consequences.

    Getting others to expose their failings, lack of intelligence, lack of humor, and lack of understanding has never been my purpose, but I do seem to have a knack for it, nevertheless.

    Those who enjoy dishing it out, but can't take it. don't properly belong in the business of blogging. What's sauce for the goose is always sauce for the gander -- no matter how distasteful it might appear to the more captious, contumelious and self righteous among us.

    The briefest glance at the paltry number of responses drawn by the worthiest offerings compared to the large number received by anything that could be construed as unduly provocative, scandalous or controversial tells far more about the mentality of readership than it does about that of authorship.

    It's disappointing -- but by no means surprising -- to see how dangled bait almost invariably creates a feeding frenzy -- especially when the bait is putrid.

    ReplyDelete
  42. FT,
    I wish that I could say that this tendency to stomp anyone and everyone were limited to the blogosphere.

    There is no such limit.

    Our society has devolved into screaming frenzies.

    ReplyDelete
  43. Opinions are like assholes, EVERYBODY has one.

    Some are more correct than others. After we are long gone history will judge.

    New generation(s) will continue to fail to learn from history.

    Learning sometimes is selective, by choice.

    ReplyDelete
  44. And YOU should know!

    ReplyDelete
  45. The truth will soK your feetNovember 15, 2013 at 7:45 AM

    RN you are such a Dickhead sellout hypocrite , and a Shaw suck~up as well

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. When you're on empty and have nothing ATTACT the opponents character.

      Good job Ttwsyf!

      Delete
  46. RN,

    Respect is earned. Period. The title of First lady is, by no means, a free ticket to respect.
    I have managed to live my entire life without the use of a of a stylist. I can say with all certainty that hotpants are not appropriate attire for a mother and especially not for our First LADY. Maybe the Lil Kim crowd appreciates her deviant sense of style. I am not a fan of her, um "music".
    She is an angry, wretched human being. I would not allow her anywhere near people or animals that I love.

    Andie

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Andie, I respect your opinion and understand it. It is well stated.

      Your final "She is an angry, wretched human being.", is where I part company as there exists no factual evidence of this to my knowledge. Perhaps you could supply such factual evidence?

      Delete
  47. @ FreeThinke: Those who enjoy dishing it out, but can't take it. don't properly belong in the business of blogging. What's sauce for the goose is always sauce for the gander -- no matter how distasteful it might appear to the more captious, contumelious and self righteous among us.

    So true. Your poem above that comment flew right over the progressive heads, as well as the reactionary ones, I'm afraid.

    Mort

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There is something to be said for tact and class in the presentation of matetial such as was presented here in this post.

      Rising above the temptation to wallow in the perceived muck of your adversary or opponent is a display of character.

      Unfortunately we all fall short from time to time.

      Delete
  48. When I worked at Nordstrom during college we were required to adhere to a dress code. Perhaps, thanks to Michelle, we should institute a dress code for First Ladies?
    It really isn't Rocket Science. The bra strap goes UNDER the shirt.
    The woman has no self respect. How could she? After all, as an affirmative action hack, everything was given to her without merit.

    Andie

    ReplyDelete
  49. Duckenheimer,

    Chalk paint has no fumes. I'm good. Your concern over my well being is flattering, however. :)
    You don't have children. Otherwise you would understand that nice girls don't dress that way.

    Andie

    ReplyDelete
  50. Go Ahead and Call Me Vulgar Names You Dickhead, You Sorry Assed, Anti-Semitic Son of a Whore, You Piece of Bitch Trash! You Dirty, Low-Life. Diseased, and Desperate, Scumbucket Piece of Shit!

    ReplyDelete
  51. Wow RR, such intelligent and witty commentary. You've outdone yourself. Now everyone knows beyond a single doubt what a angry and wrenched soul you are.

    May you one day find peace as you confront your inner demons.

    May the Gods of Ancient Greece be with you.

    ReplyDelete
  52. Michelle “Moochie” Obama's clothes can make you puke! And here advise about food is way out of line. It's a shame that we have those we elected in charge of our countries economy minding the business of our kids parents.
    Another sign that the government is sticking their noises into places they have no business.

    I don't want the government, or someone who took the election of her husband to "Finally find something about this Country she can be proud of! If she has such a hard time finding respect for America then she shouldn't be telling me how to raise my kids nor do I want her telling me what they can or cannot eat. Let her take care of her own kids and leave mine alone!

    ReplyDelete
  53. RN,

    Elegance and modesty go a long way in earning respect.
    Did you read her thesis? Have you heard her speeches?
    Her hatred and resentment are obvious.

    Andie

    ReplyDelete
  54. I wasn't trying to be witty, I was being truthful.

    ReplyDelete
  55. Which snake is more poisonous the black king messiah or the black moocher mamba?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "Class on display?"

      I've see what you have written on the sleeping with the devil bolg, and if you call THAT " class" then I don't know what else to say!

      Delete
  56. Divine Theatre said...
    ”RN,
    Elegance and modesty go a long way in earning respect.”


    unfortunately YOU have neither

    ReplyDelete
  57. RN

    I think I should be offended but because it is you, all is forgiven.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There is, after all is said and done, something about not taking it personally.

      Hope your day is going well.

      Delete
  58. Divine Theater said...

    After all, as an affirmative action hack, everything was given to her without merit.

    ***********************

    It's true. She received a huge promotion with an almost 100% pay bump after the corrupt Chicago Democrat Party Machine made her clean and articulate husband a senator.

    She did work for it though, helping rich hospitals maintain the bottom line by herding the ghetto dwellers to poorer neighborhood clinics.

    ReplyDelete
  59. Divine Theater --- So someone caught her with her bra strapped exposed or her face in an unflattering expression. So what.

    I'm a street photographer and get in camera range and I can find a moment when you look like a complete fool and get the shot. It ain't hard and it's not something that's worth doing in my opinion.

    If you are taking photos of celebrities it's a different story.

    So get off your damn hobbyhorse and stop sniffing the chalk paint.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah ducky, I used to dabble in photography (my father did potrait and wedding photography years ago) 35 years ago and you are absolutely correct. A camera, a little time and patience and it's amazing the unflattering shots a photographer can get.

      Delete
  60. Radical Redneck and others who spew semi-incoherent anger:

    Do you realize you do your cause more harm than good?

    Passion is good. Nasty, profanity-infected personal attacks drive people away from you and your cause.

    ReplyDelete
  61. Obama’s former Commie Green Jobs Czar Van Jones really socked it to the “so-called libertarians” at an Occupy rally in Los Angeles last weekend. Saying that
    “They say they love America but they hate the people, the Blacks, the Gays, the Lesbians, even the people with piercing’s”
    Personally, although I hate to admit that I agree with that jerk, but I think that he’s correct. I think that the majority of Libertarians are Crazy. Consider Ir-Rational USA Lester, and the other jerk-off, Ron Paul. Is there really any difference between lefties and libertarians? Who can tell the difference a Nut-Job, and a Nut-Case?

    ReplyDelete

  62. For the record I think that Anti-Semitic People like Lester from Rational Nation USA. Really Suck!

    ReplyDelete
  63. Why is there all this focus on Michelle Obama’s ass?

    I have read in the blogs that this all comes down to stereotypes about black women’s bodies. It is well known that Negresses (Black Women) all have those big thick ghetto booties.
    The most pernicious part of this is that it all fits into a semi-coherent delusion about angry black people getting power and trying to control what you eat while using your money to buy Air Jordan Sneakers and eat Popeyes in the White (Black) House. It’s not just that Michelle Obama is a fat black woman, it’s that she’s an angry, fat black woman!

    ReplyDelete
  64. Spidey, what, no posts up at your web yet?

    Understandable, because as near as any thinking person can tell from your comment droppings you have nothing to say.

    You a visitor to (or friend of) Canardo (the Dervish) Sanders who operates that up and coming progressive blog Sleeping with The Devil? I ask because he is the only other nimrod that calls me Lester.

    Bye the way, the name is Les. To you it's Sir.

    ReplyDelete
  65. Africa's Entertainment, and Gossip Guy..November 15, 2013 at 11:28 AM

    Slightly off topic, but it refreshing to see a White Conservative who checks out Black women's asses.
    Just like it’s refreshing to see a Black Liberal who checks out a White Chicks ass
    rather than drinking cheap Gin and stuffing their faces with Fried Chicken
    Corn Bread and Chicken wings!

    ReplyDelete
  66. I think that Lester is getting a bit angry... Oh lordy I shaking in my Booties.

    ReplyDelete
  67. Africa's Entertainment, and Gossip Guy.. said...
    "Slightly off topic, but it refreshing to see a White Conservative who checks out Black women's asses."

    One cannot help but check out her ass. After all, he's the president.


    Ducky, I don't care about Michelle's physical attributes. She is a slob and she dresses inappropriately. Even you must admit that.

    ReplyDelete
  68. AEaGG pretty much sums up the mentality and bigotry of the dieing old white male conservative racists.



    ReplyDelete
  69. Bahahahahaaaa....I guess that I hit a nerve under that thin skin, I see.

    ReplyDelete
  70. Sick Of All Of You Cons.November 15, 2013 at 11:49 AM

    When the right stops squealing about how ugly women of the democratic party are, and how big Michele Obama’s back side is , the Fat jokes about Chris Christie “may” stop. But don't worry, it's only cellulose, and you can loose the fat, but not the ugly.

    Poll after poll shows Hillary wins again! Looks like Hillary is a shoe in for POTUS because Christie is the best candidate the GOP could potentially run against her in 2016 and Hillary can the blob by a mile.

    ReplyDelete
  71. Moochie's butt is enormous, and she flaunts it rather than tries to cover it up..

    ReplyDelete
  72. Oh, Dear. I came to the party too late.

    Perhaps it's time to shut this thread down, Mr. FreeThinke.

    ReplyDelete
  73. It’s pretty simple, libs. On ObamaCare, WE WERE RIGHT!. You, as always, were WRONG. Not that you, most of you libs, really believed ObamaCare would be a panacea to fix what’s wrong with health care in America. That’s what you do. Believe. You believe anything that spews out of the mouths of your liberal messiahs even when its obvious to sentient individuals the words are obvious lies. That you libs believed in something so outlandish as ObamaCare shows the lack of reasoning and cognitive skills. Hell, you even fell for Global Warming even when the accurate data showed that Al Gore’s statements were as accurate as Obama telling Americans they could keep their insurance plan and their doctor. Why did you believe? Because you’re stupid. Period. Yeah Period! Now where did I heard that word (Period) before?
    The Tea Party movement was onto the ObamaCare Bull Shit from the get go. First, what government program has ever performed better, more efficiently, and less costly than the private sector? It can’t be done. Once again, ObamaCare is a perfect example of nightmarish costly public sector malfeasance. But the government doesn’t really care about costs. After all, it’s not their money and they are not held to account! How many heads have rolled over the ObamaCare disaster zone? Think a CEO in the private sector would have kept his job if he had just spent $600 million on a website that doesn’t work? What is the only reason those who so blatantly lied and supported ObamaCare while it was being crammed through/bought off in Congress? Because they are afraid they will lose their precious seats in Congress. Politicians in both political parties would rather eat their children than lose their seats.
    The Tea Party is smart. The RINO Republican politicians are stupid. RINO’S foolishly, as always, followed the lead of Democrats on ObamaCare. They allowed the discussion to be “everyone has the right to affordable health care insurance” instead of “who in America doesn’t receive free health care services?” In Dallas, Texas, 70% of the ninos born at the public Parkland Hospital are from illegal alien parents. They have no insurance. They have no money. That is until their baby is born. Then the baby is an American citizen with boatloads of taxpayer cash awaiting him in the form of welfare, food stamps, Section 8 housing, etc. Es bueno vivir en Gringolandia, no? Republicans, as usual, played by Democrat rules and were portrayed as the greedy, bad guys because they half-heartedly argued the wrong argument. Republican leadership in Congress couldn’t piss and hit the ground.

    ReplyDelete
  74. I never heard ONE RINO ask if the Democrats really expected the welfare mooching hordes to purchase ObamaCare? That is what needed to be asked. Welfare moochers don’t pay for anything. They buy goods and services with wealth stolen from working Americans. So did the Dims expect the mooching class to buy ObamaCare insurance? Hell no! They didn’t care. Democrats knew they wouldn’t. Democrats didn’t even care if ObamaCare worked or not or they would have at least a cursory website that actually worked after a three year lead in time. So what did Dims want? DEMOCRATS WANTED TOTAL CONTROL OF 1/6 OF THE AMERICAN ECONOMY. BECAUSE THEY WANT 6/6 (THAT’S 100% FOR ALL YOU LIBERALS) OF THE AMERICAN ECONOMY.

    Even today, the idiot Nancy Pelosi who told us our government overlords would have to pass ObamaCare before we could see what’s in it, is promising a big fix to be announced today. Sorry, we in the Tea Party movement didn’t believe her before and we sure as hell don’t believe her now. After all, she’s a liberal. She lies. That’s what they do. And, fortunately for elected libs, there are enough stupid people who believe their lies. Period. There is no “big fix” for ObamaCare! The only big fix is to repeal the thing completely and work on free-market improvements to health care. Does anyone really expect the Republicans and Democrats to do that? Heh.

    Liberals and their buddies the Real Nut Jobs Progressives have attacked and ridiculed the Tea Party movement since its inception for one reason. Fear. They fear the Tea Party. The Republican establishment also fears the Tea Party. That’s why they despise Ted Cruz. The Tea Party has been correct on the massive failures of the Stimulus Bill, Cash for Perfectly Good Cars, so-called Green Energy (the only thing green about green energy is all the green wasted on the temporary jobs it creates before they move to China), ObamaCare, etc. Why? Because fiscal conservatives in the Tea Party movement fully realize the futility in hoping government is the answer. Hoping brings change. Change for the worse! Knowledge, reason, and fact bring positive change! Government is a parasite that sucks wealth from the private sector and redistributes it to the self-serving will of corruptocrats in Washington. Government = Inefficiency. How many times must we learn the same lesson?

    The Tea Party movement is a direct threat to the status quo of our elected ruling class in Washington. That is why Republican RINOs hate the Tea Party as much as Democrats. The Tea Party movement, if its goals of fiscal sanity are realized, will destroy the world of the ruling class and remove them from their nearly unrivaled world of power and luxury. We seek statesmen who want the best for America and are willing to make the tough decisions and take the heat from the left in both parties. Ted Cruz is the perfect example of this. Outside of Ted Cruz and Mike Lee in the Senate, the Republicans are basically Democrats.
    So, liberals, it’s very clear to anyone who doesn’t breathe out of their mouth (this excludes the entire staffs of the mainstream propaganda media) that ObamaCare is a total disaster zone. As is the man whose name sits and befouls the program and the presidency.
    Never forget the First Theorem of Political Reality. LIBERALS DEPEND ON STUPID. There would be no Democrat Party if no stupid people exist. Fiscal conservatives rely on facts and intelligence. Stupid people have spewed their ignorance and gullibility over ObamaCare since 2009. They should hang their heads in shame for blindly supporting what is obviously the worst piece of legislation ever forced on the American people.
    When will the Tea Party receive an apology from the leftists who so disgustingly disparaged the honor, intelligence and integrity of the movement? I believe an apology is scheduled for the 12th. Of Never!
    LIBERALS DEPEND ON STUPIDITY. Truer words were never spoken.

    ReplyDelete
  75. To the asshole who wrote this:

    A. Lurker said...

    Why is there all this focus on Michelle Obama’s ass?

    I have read in the blogs that this all comes down to stereotypes about black women’s bodies. It is well known that Negresses (Black Women) all have those big thick ghetto booties.
    The most pernicious part of this is that it all fits into a semi-coherent delusion about angry black people getting power and trying to control what you eat while using your money to buy Air Jordan Sneakers and eat Popeyes in the White (Black) House. It’s not just that Michelle Obama is a fat black woman, it’s that she’s an angry, fat black woman!

    November 15, 2013 at 11:19 AM


    Use your own damned made-up name, jackass!

    ReplyDelete
  76. Wow IMO, that was one hell of a rant. You do the Tea Party Proud!

    Feel better now?

    ReplyDelete
  77. Off topic but of interest and somewhat related.

    http://rationalnationusa.blogspot.com/2013/11/has-unraveling-started.html

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What the hell does that have to do with chopped liver ?
      I really think that RN. Has finally flipped his cork.

      Delete
  78. Admit it A. Lunkhead, you didn't even read it.

    Carry on...

    ReplyDelete
  79. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  80. What a Typical liberal you are RN! You can all argue back and forth over this issue as much as you want. However ask yourselves this: Do you even know the ideology behind Marxism or the 'American Dream'? When you find out how it has killed the American Dream. come back and explain. Do you even care? The only thing that seems to interest you is the size of Michelle Obama’s ass. By your LACK of knowledge, I will assume you did not attend college, or if you did then you must have had Liberal Professors. I wonder if you learned the idea of Socialism is to make us all equal. Equally poor

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Your illteracy is obvious Anon.

      Did you complete grade school?

      Delete
    2. I was probably out of college when you where still filling your diapers Anon.

      Delete
  81. Calling Obama a Muslim has not worked. Saying he was born in Kenya hasn't worked, and is actually blowing up in Rush Limbaugh’s face . Whining about golf games and making fun of Michelle's ass and labeling foreign policy trips "vacations". Claiming 91 Million Americans are out of work is a lie. It is one more reason to fact check everything posted by the rabid right wing, those who post outrageous, many time ridiculous statistics, as if anyone other than the willfully ignorant or the stupid will believe them
    and all the rest of the rightwings crap have all been catastrophic failure. The GOP is completely bankrupt of ideas to help the country. All they have is empty rhetoric. And complaining about how our liberties have been taken away from us. Duhhhhh...

    ReplyDelete
  82. That last picture reminds me of an old folk song we used to sing in grade school

    Buffalo Butt, wont you come out tonight?
    Won't you come out tonight?
    Won't you come out tonight?

    Won't you - won't you - won't you - won't you
    Come out tonight and dance by the light of the moon?


    Negrophilia Galore

    ReplyDelete
  83. My hat is off to you Free Thinke. You are among the very best at bringing out the very worst bigots, racists, and knuckle draggers that run the internet. Thank you for employimg your clever methodology in exposing bigots, racists, and knuckle dragging Neanderthals that effect us all.

    You are deserving of an Academy Award my friend. Job well down.

    ReplyDelete
  84. RN,

    How far we've come since the days when others falsely accused you of same. Good luck in finding future defenders.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I do not recall you ever defending me.

      Those whose behavoir, or words fit my charge know who they are. Their statements are what they ar and made repeatedly and with intent.

      Those for who the charge does NOT fit know this as well.

      Speaking truth to power, or hate and bigotry is more important than to concern oneself with the number of defenders one may or may not have or find.

      Delete
    2. Defend a anti-Semitic jerk off ?
      I don't think do at all!

      Delete
  85. ps - Making MORE racial jokes is the BEST thing that could happen between the races.

    ReplyDelete
  86. Rational Nation USA said...

    " My hat is off to you Free Thinke. You are among the very best at bringing out the very worst bigots, racists, and knuckle draggers that run the internet. Thank you for employimg your clever methodology in exposing bigots, racists, and knuckle dragging Neanderthals that effect us all.You are deserving of an Academy Award my friend. Job well down.

    do you think that anyone really give a CRAP what YOU think!

    ReplyDelete
  87. MHO, If the shoe fits, wear it. If not you need not be concerned.

    Whether you or anyone else gives a crap what I think, well, it is what it is, or what it will be.


    But thanks for your concern just the same.

    ReplyDelete
  88. Take advice from a Shaw suck up? I don't think so.....Anyone stupid enough to vote for and support Barack Obama will never get my respect.

    And as for Shaw, she has a serious mental problem. I am not sure if she's just looking for attention or if she's really sick.

    And as for Michelle Obama, I love that she can think everyone's fat when she clearly has a weight problem. Stop telling me what to eat, drink, drive, read, watch, what light bulb to use.. Yes you are by creating regulations restricting our freedoms to choose. Liberalism is an oxymoron!

    I find her to be unappealing and an assault to all senses. and I think that she is very masculine.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I didn't vote for Obama either time. I'm neither a partisan repub or partisan dem. Typically libertarian.

      Oops, hole in your assumptions.

      Delete
  89. Oh my goodness those pictures of the Moocher are too much..! Every time I see them I want to put a saddle on the Moocher's back and feed her oats. LOL....

    ReplyDelete
  90. I do not recall you ever defending me.

    That's not surprising.

    No good deeds ever go unpunished.

    ReplyDelete
  91. Mrs Obama is a classy and beautiful women. President Obama has a wonderful life time partner. The posting of obviously photoshopped pictures and these vile comments are just pathetic and tasteless. even in your silly, petty, childish attempt to humiliate the 1st Lady, you FAIL because her outer beauty and style is admired GLOBALLY. You are the fish in the pond who never got fed and slowly but surely you contaminate the other Fish. Well EDUCATED AND INFORMED people know better. Your entitled to your silly opinion to get the conversation going. your entitled to COMMENT NUMEROUS TIMES ON YOUR OWN STORY. heck....after I comment you are entitled to continue to have the conversation mostly with yourself and a few idiots who should be declared legally blind. I find you all to be..driven by HATE, and RACISM and Mr. Free Thinke you and these (doctored photos confirm that) and last but not least this was driven by JEALOUSLY. This is a Stupid and insulting post! And btw, has anyone noticed that most racists cannot spell ?

    ReplyDelete
  92. Mrs Obama is a classy and beautiful women.

    lol!

    ...apparently racists aren't the only ones who cannot spell and/or speak English.

    ReplyDelete
  93. Well, well, well! This has been a most interesting -- an REVEALING -- exercise -- even more than I expected it might be.

    The MIRROR TEST shows us truths that might otherwise have been concealed once again.

    Our character is best shown in the way we choose to interpret phenomena.

    ReplyDelete
  94. Thersites, I truly love your friend Zizek.

    Thank you again for bringing his lively, good-humored, ultimately kind-hearted approach to our attention.

    ReplyDelete
  95. FT,
    Yes, indeed. Quite the mirror test.

    It seems to me that those who gazed into the mirror didn't see what their reflection truly is. Hmmmm....

    ReplyDelete
  96. How anyone can call that Lard Ass "classy and beautiful" is a puzzle to me.

    ReplyDelete
  97. Sorry folks, but she is seriously ugly, sorry, but there’s no way around it. If this makes you mad then maybe you should try to focus on role models with Godly character and a little humility. At least that way if they are unattractive in their appearance they will have something appropriate to point to. Ethical people however may not be the kind of people you want representing you though, so it looks like your stuck a very ugly leader, and the same old routine of defending them against all logic.

    ReplyDelete
  98. There are none so blind as those who see only their own (usually warped) opinion, AOW.

    ReplyDelete
  99. My apologies, FreeThinke, for being such a complete *ss these past few weeks.

    I have missed your company.

    ReplyDelete
  100. FreeThinke said...
    "There are none so blind as those who see only their own (usually warped) opinion, AOW."


    Oh, NO FT, you are all wet, we can see alright, we just love to let it all out.. We are SICK AND TIRED OF HEARING AND READING ALL THAT CRAPOLA THAT THE BUNCH ON THE LEFT, INCLUDING THE WICKED ONE, writes all the time. So we welcome the chance to get this off our chests.
    So please don't underestimate us with your "Mirror Crap" We are well aware of what we are doing and saying. The Chicken have come home to roost.
    The lies, the fumble means that the game over for Obama and his Obamacare. Both the HealthCare.gov Web site and his promise that people could keep their health plans if they liked them. Are two very big LIES, but the game’s not over in his feeble mind. And not in ours either. There's a tone of panic on ObamaLand and in the Progressive land as well. Obama is definitely on the ropes!

    Thank you very much.

    ReplyDelete
  101. The American political environment (and this room to a degree) reminds me a lot of the book " Lord of the Flies."

    Mirrors ... Lord of the Flies... Indeed.

    ReplyDelete
  102. The Government Is Not the Master of Your DestinyNovember 16, 2013 at 4:45 PM

    This post is a rebuttal to the PROGRESSIVE WITCH who is constantly sucking up to the Moocher as if she is some wonderful, beautiful, intelligent, and gracious First lady. . She is far from it, she’s neither wonderful, beautiful, or gracious.
    Yes, she is on the cover of every magazine this year but so was Vladimir Putin, and so was Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, so, so what!
    That's right I said it!
    Will somebody please tell her that she should stop telling me what to eat, drink, drive, read, watch, and what light bulb to use. I don’t remember her winning any election that gives her the right to tell me anything.

    Obama is drowning our country in debt. He has been caught in scandal and scandal. He is ruining any chance of a future this country has. He is recording or phone data yeah even yours. Yet someone calling the First Lady Fat unacceptable? . Come on wake up

    ReplyDelete
  103. Thank you, "Titan," I've missed you too -- in all your many and varied guises.

    We all get peevish from time to time -- me included.

    It's only natural, I suppose given the "climate" we are living in at this juncture -- or should I have said JUNKture? ;-).

    ReplyDelete
  104. Your comparison to William Golding's hideous book is very apt, Les.
    _____________________

    As to those proudly asserting their full awareness of what they are doing, I can only say, "If you really knew what you were doing, you wouldn't do it."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Free Thinke, aptly stated Sir, and can be apples nearly universally. Certainly with respect partisans blinded by their own partisanship.

      Delete
  105. The next thing we’ll hear is that Chelsea Clinton is “wonderful, Beautiful, Glamorous, and Gracious. Oh Lord, pass the Pepto-Bismol ....

    ReplyDelete
  106. What is the purpose of engaging in something as base as that with this First Lady? She asks!


    Why not, I answered...

    ReplyDelete
  107. "Junkture" indeed! Many times the signal gets overpowered by the noise!

    Thankyou for accepting my apology. :)

    ReplyDelete
  108. Thersites,
    Via the miracle of comment notification, I saw your apology shortly after you typed it in.

    I've always respected you and thought highly of you. Even more so now!

    Thus ends one of the few compliments I've ever typed in here in the blogosphere. **smile**

    ReplyDelete
  109. EXCELLENT BLOG FREE THINKE, KEEP UP THIS MARVELOUS WORK.
    AND DON'T KNUCKLE DOWN TO THE LIBS, NO MATTER WHAT THEY WRITE ABOUT YOU.

    ReplyDelete
  110. And as you are likely well aware, I have always greatly admired you, AoW! Thank you for your kind words!

    ReplyDelete
  111. As RN would say... "You know who you are!"

    ReplyDelete
  112. Rational Nation USA, As ALWAYS you are full of crap and full of yourself.

    you're so full of shit, your eyes are brown.


    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No SPIDEY, my eyes are blue. I'm a WASA.

      But your brain is made up of the Brown Stinky Stuff for sure.

      Delete
  113. Rational Nation USA says that he isn't a Democrat/Liberal...
    But you sure act like a Democrat/ Liberal!

    I’m really sick of those trying to make excuses. When you make everyone pay for things they will never need, and then set up these minimum requirements as if it’s society’s responsibility to pay for the choices of individuals, this is what happens when liberals put their Party FIRST, not the country.

    As for Michelle Obama, I like the comments made here.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. cwhiatt, indeed things are not always as they seem to be. Nor are perceptions based on ones cherished paradigms neccessarily accurate. I give you a great deal of credit for at least questioning.

      I am not a democrat. I an not a republican. I lean to TRUE libertarian and Objectivist philosophy. I march to the beat of no drummer. I reject pure partisanship out of hand. I refuse to conform simply because the mob demands it, paericulary when it is wrong. I am despised by both the right and the left. I do not concern myself with being accepted on another's standards.

      I am, have been for 61 years, and will always be, AN INDIVIDUAL. It is what scares politicians, capitalists of the 20th and 21st century, collectivist that make up the republican party and democratic party, and those who simply want to live by the standards set by the elite they apparently look up
      to, regardless whether it be of either left or right tilt.

      Delete
  114. Sorry, Free... our character is revealed in how we choose to live our lives...

    ReplyDelete


  115. A primly moral pose can serve to mask
    Bilious temperament and vile conceit ––
    In fact the urge to cripple and defeat
    The one once loved now harshly brought to task.
    Counterfeit religion acts the fiend,
    Hobbling Affection’s natural course
    Overcoming love with fake remorse.
    No bliss survives when righteously demeaned.
    What makes a creepy, sickening sense of shame
    Haunt happiness as though ‘twere harlotry ––
    Even husband’s needs belong with varletry?
    Evil righteousness kills Passion’s flame.
    Let him whose pious poison mars affection
    Suffer from rebellion and rejection.


    ~ FreeThinke

    Make of the above what you will. I'm absolutely positive it will be misconstrued by most -- IF noticed at all.

    Nevertheless, I'll follow my secret heart, as I always do regardless of the consequences.

    Getting others to expose their failings, lack of intelligence, lack of humor, and lack of understanding has never been my purpose, but I do seem to have a knack for it, nevertheless.

    Those who enjoy dishing it out, but can't take it. don't properly belong in the business of blogging. What's sauce for the goose is always sauce for the gander -- no matter how distasteful it might appear to the more captious, contumelious and self-righteous among us.

    The briefest glance at the paltry number of responses drawn by the worthiest offerings compared to the large number received by anything that could be construed as unduly provocative, scandalous or controversial tells far more about the mentality of readership than it does about that of authorship.

    ReplyDelete
  116. It's disappointing -- but by no means surprising -- to see how dangled bait almost invariably creates a feeding frenzy -- especially when the bait is putrid.

    ReplyDelete
  117. Free, there is no virtue in making a point like this. It's like screaming fire in a crowded movie theater.

    If it was your intent to give people a forum through which they could share their insults, you certainly accomplished that.

    The question is why?

    Why set up a situation in which people would be encouraged to show hate and treat others badly?

    Character indeed...

    ReplyDelete
  118. Helen Highwater says:

    Why?

    I'm sure I know. He hopes that someday you will recognize how stupid, shallow, vain and nasty you are, and maybe begin to make amends. That's why.

    Liberals, or whatever you think you are, are scared to death of words and images, but they never consider the consequences of their deadly deeds.

    And people who think they are "conservatives" disgrace themselves when they stoop to libel, childish name calling and deliberate misinterpretation.

    The whole lot of you thrive on ill will and disapproval,as though you had a right to look down on others. That makes you despicable in my eyes.

    ReplyDelete

IF YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND THE FOLLOWING, YOU DON'T BELONG HERE, SO KINDLY GET OUT AND STAY OUT.

We welcome Conversation
But without Vituperation.
If your aim is Vilification ––
Other forms of Denigration ––
Unfounded Accusation --
Determined Obfuscation ––
Alienation with Self-Justification ––
We WILL use COMMENT ERADICATION.


IN ADDITION

Gratuitous Displays of Extraneous Knowledge Offered Not To Shed Light Or Enhance the Discussion, But For The Primary Purpose Of Giving An Impression Of Superiority are obnoxiously SELF-AGGRANDIZING, and therefore, Subject to Removal at the Discretion of the Censor-in-Residence.