Monday, October 13, 2014

WHO IS THIS MAN?


He is nothing special –– just another myth for leftist iconoclasts to smash –– another target for them to abuse mercilessly in their fervent quest to denigrate the White Man while defaming and discrediting all that White Men have accomplished in order to deal the coup de grace to Western Civilization, and sweep it into the dustbin of history.

NOW MOVE ON. NOTHNG TO SEE HERE.
JUST BE SURE TO SPIT ON HIS IMAGE, AND MUTTER "YOU GOD-DAMNED BASTARD! I HOPE YOU ARE ROASTING IN THE HOTTEST CORNER OF HELL" BEFORE YOU GO.



16 comments:

  1. FT,
    Zinnism in action!

    I chose to post a poem about Columbus today.

    What a brave man he was -- as was his crew! Talk about taking a leap of faith!

    I've read that Columbus was a devout Christian, too. Yet another reason for the Left to hate him.

    BTW, when you were searching for the portrait of Columbus, did you find any others? I haven't seen any, but perhaps you have.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Good morning, AOW! I decided to take an "oblique" approach rather than the traditional Veneration-Adoration v. Denigration and Dismissal this morning after having received a particularly obnoxious email citing an article about Columbus from that filthiest of leftists rags THRUTHOUT earlier today.

    In the interests of preventing ulcers and possibly worse, I have decided I will no longer tolerate the presence of putrid garbage either from the Left OR the Right any longer.

    Few seem to realize anymore that Free Thinking and Freedom of Expression include the right to EXCLUDE the presence of elements one finds intolerable -- for WHATEVER reason.

    I winnow out fully a third of all comments received every day now. I'd rather entertain very few worthwhile remarks tan a host of moral and intellectual detritus.

    I never have -- and never will -- seek mere POPULARITY.

    If you Google Christopher Columbus, any number of images pop up. You may click on those and comb through what's available. Most however, are segments or variations of the portrait posted at the head of today's "item."

    Did you not find the famous portrait reversed to look leftward, shorn of it's costume and most of its extraneous hair to stimulate different ideas about who this man might really have been?

    It's my contention that we are so distracted by the "trappings" surrounding historic figures we lose touch with the understanding that they were just human beings not unlike ourselves.

    ReplyDelete
  3. FT,
    I asked about the portrait because, back then, such paintings were so often "airbrushed" so as to make the subject look quite different from his actual appearance.

    I hope that you enjoy Joaquin Miller's poem at my web site. I love the lessons that it teaches -- not only history lessons.

    ReplyDelete
  4. FT,
    I didn't notice the reversal until you mentioned it. More coffee, please.

    ReplyDelete
  5. ++++++++++ NOTICE: ++++++++++


    All Remarks FROM, TO or ABOUT blog personalities who have made it their business to be disruptive, disagreeable and destructive shall be REMOVED as soon as they are discovered.

    We refuse to allow ourselves to be forced into permanent Comment Moderation which seems to be the objective of the persistent incursions of one peculiarly spiteful little troll.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Obliterating the memory of Columbus is NOT their object. Obliterating the ideal inherent in his discovery... now THAT is another matter entirely.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      Delete
  7. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Spelling it out clearlyOctober 13, 2014 at 10:25 AM

      This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      Delete
  8. Cockroach Rational Nation USAOctober 13, 2014 at 11:06 AM

    This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Dudley Dowell said

    "In the interests of preventing ulcers and possibly worse, I have decided I will no longer tolerate the presence of putrid garbage either from the Left OR the Right any longer."

    Good on you, sir. I hope you stick to your guns.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Dudley Dowell said

    "I winnow out fully a third of all comments received every day now. I'd rather entertain very few worthwhile remarks than a host of moral and intellectual detritus."

    Hear! Hear! Your policies are music to my ears, sir. You have my full support for whatever it may be worth. These blogging programs really ought to have an 'exclude' provision for bothersome individuals. Instead they force you either to accept garbage or punish everybody by using comment moderation. Frankly, either way that stinks out loud.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I heartily second what Dudley Dowell stated above.

    Carry on, Free Thinke.

    And don't let the bastards get you down!

    ReplyDelete
  12. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  13. ++++++++++++ NOTICE ++++++++++++

    We welcome differing views as long as they are sincere, serious, on topic, and responsibly stated. We regularly delete comments, however, for two reasons.

    ______ WE DO NOT SUFFER FOOLS GLADLY ______

    ___ WE WILL NOT ALLOW ANYONE TO INSULT US ___

    ReplyDelete
  14. Esteban MacGillicuddy said

    Hey! That ain't no guy. That's me mother-in-law dressed in her best going to funerals outfit. The wife's been trying to get her to ditch that lousy hat for years, but she she won't part with it. Says she wants to be buried in the damned thing when her time comes. We can't think why. Doesn't do nothing for her that's for sure. What a frump!

    ReplyDelete

IF YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND THE FOLLOWING, YOU DON'T BELONG HERE, SO KINDLY GET OUT AND STAY OUT.

We welcome Conversation
But without Vituperation.
If your aim is Vilification ––
Other forms of Denigration ––
Unfounded Accusation --
Determined Obfuscation ––
Alienation with Self-Justification ––
We WILL use COMMENT ERADICATION.


IN ADDITION

Gratuitous Displays of Extraneous Knowledge Offered Not To Shed Light Or Enhance the Discussion, But For The Primary Purpose Of Giving An Impression Of Superiority are obnoxiously SELF-AGGRANDIZING, and therefore, Subject to Removal at the Discretion of the Censor-in-Residence.