Saturday, September 29, 2012


The United States of America 
v. “The World Community” 

The Ongoing Effort to Turn the USA into a Pariah. 
Who’s to Blame?

[NOTE: These remarks first appeared in response to an article posted by AOW expressing concern over the impact of an Arab Muslim and UN initiative to criminalize freedom of speech. We thought they deserved further amplification, and towards that end have posted them here. - FT]

In truth we have Adolf Hitler to thank for the frightful situation concerning The United States of America vis-a-vis "The World Community."

The current mania to imagine it appropriate and "just" to criminalize and punish gestures and commentary deemed "offensive" by -- You Name It -- is part of the Political Correctness that originated in the aftermath of the Holocaust.

Oh yes it did, Virginia!

The enormous power garnered by cries and accusations of "anti-Semitism," a power that increased by leaps and bounds after the war, seemed only fair and decent after the horrors perpetrated by Hitler's Third Reich, of course. However, in the long run it has -- as with most policies designed to inhibit freedom of expression -- it has come full circle to bite us on the buttocks.

Once other Grievance Groups began to realize the enormous power repeated and persistent cries of "anti-Semitism" gave to Jews, naturally they began to follow suit and the Denunciation Disease spread, has now become epidemic, and is threatening to subvert and destroy our Bill of Rights.

First Anti-Semites, then Anti-Blacks -- and now Anti-Islamaniacs -- became the New Salem Witches of our time.

The increasingly powerful drive towards INTERNATIONALISM on all fronts, which has been in the works for well over a hundred years, is part of the Progressive Agenda to dissolve our sovereignty and that of all other nations in favor of One World Government, which of course will be SOCIALISTIC -- meaning a leveling across the board of all societies to uniform mediocrity at best, mutually shared misery at worst ostensibly in the interests of "Fairness" and "Equality."

For several decades now Caucasian Christians have been considered Fair Game -- especially if they are Protestant, prosperous and powerful. The ethnic and religious groups that achieved the most and became the richest and most powerful have been in effect "Scheduled for Demolition" –– what the elitists, of course, prefer to call "TRANSFORMATION."

This current obsession with "concern" over the "feelings" in "The Arab Street" is bogus. It is just another part of the long-planned Agenda to Discredit White Achievement, Decrease White Power, Diminish White Wealth, and thus give Caucasians, Capitalists and Christians their long awaited Comeuppance.

If I were you, I wouldn't worry too much about the Islamaniacs. They TOO are just being USED as PAWNS in the deadly game perpetrated by The Oligarchs to Achieve World Domination.

We ought, instead of getting so involved with all the smelly, Rotten Red Herrings the Oligarchs keep throwing in our path, to work feverishly to learn precisely WHO these would-be Slave Masters that have us all at each others' throats really are, and figure out HOW to DEFANG and CASTRATE the bastards before we are reduced to the status of galley slaves in Trireme Amerika.


~ FreeThinke

26 comments:

  1. Anti-whatever goes hand in hand with collective guilt.

    Of course, the Holocaust was one of the most egregious things that ever happened in modern history.

    But I myself didn't do that.

    Nobody in my family did either.

    I myself am not responsible for the deeds involved with slaver.

    Nobody in my family held slaves. Ever -- and going way, way back to the earliest records of my family tree.

    I do find it astounding that there isn't more anti-Russian sentiment. Stalin's horrors!

    ReplyDelete
  2. You may hate what I have to say but oh well. You can delete me of course.

    Who are these Slave Masters?

    I've got a rather *different* take on all of this that I've been gathering over the last few months. Which is: the MAIN impetus in this world toward both socialism and a One World Government, that hardly anybody suspects, is the Vatican. There USED to be-- prior to the last century -- a ton of information casting Rome in this light, revealing their neverending efforts to bring down the Protestant West, but that kind of knowledge has been suppressed over the last century.

    Nevertheless the information is available to those willing to dig for it. If anybody wants to pursue it you can peruse some of the books I've listed on my Catholicism blog: http://enemyofchrist.blogspot.com/

    The plot to destroy our borders and let in bazillions of Hispanic ...CATHOLICS...ought to be easy enough to consider as coming from Rome. As well as anything that vilifies Protestants, such as in the movies. Think about it.

    TWO CAUTIONS:

    1) I am NOT blaming Catholics themselves at ALL so although your Catholic readership may feel insulted by what I'm saying I don't mean to insult them but to inform them of something I believe they need to know just as the rest of us do. This is the work of the power hierarchy in Rome, of which the average Catholic is pretty much ignorant. I do believe they should learn about it, however, and exit said power structure as soon as possible.

    2) In laying the MAIN blame for the effort to bring down America (and everything else that once had a Protestant character) I am not meaning to suggest that there are not other forces at work toward this same end, such as those you refer to. BUT I've come to believe that most probably behind all those other entities you are likely to find lurking some sort of stealthy Jesuit or other Vatican-inspired influence.

    It's been an eye-opener for me and I hope that others who share a conservative patriotic view might find it something worth reading up on.

    ReplyDelete
  3. AOW, the absence of anti-Marxist, anti-Communist, anti-Socialist, anti-Frankfurt School, anti-Alinsky, anti-Stalin sentiments is no accident.

    I firmly believe it is the DIRECT RESULT of the long lasting campaign I've attempted to outline in this article.

    Remember this -- curious though it may seem to our ears conditioned as they've been by years decades upon decades of surreptitious, subtle, and blatantly seductive Marxist Propaganda and Obfuscation -- that HITLER was a virulent anti-COMMUNIST.

    WE fought WITH Stalin against HITLER. Surely that must be one of THE greatest ironies of History.

    "We are here as on a darkling plane where ignorant armies clash by night"

    Matthew Arnold sure got that right.

    ~ FT

    ReplyDelete
  4. Connie,

    It would help us immeasurably to understand your thesis better, if you could take the trouble to outline, as succinctly as possible, the building blocks of factual evidence that support your thesis.

    ~ FreeThinke

    ReplyDelete
  5. Oy, I wish I could do that. I'm just learning all this stuff myself. I'll just have to rattle off what comes to mind.

    It goes back mainly to the founding of the Jesuits, by Ignatius Loyola, who developed the order specifically ti serve the Roman Catholic CounterReformation, and dedicated themselves to the attempt to bring down the Protestant Reformation by whatever means they could. Which of course had done much damage to Rome. This involved political intrigues of all kinds.

    It also involved infiltration into the educational systems of all the nations of Europe. They trained themselves as formidable intellectuals so that their educationsl institutions drew even unwary Protestants, and they succeeded in converting many back to Rome.

    They also corrupted minds. Most people know that they had a reputation for sophistic casuistic reasoning by which they could prove just about anything. They were famous for subtle reasonings that could justify any kind of sin that the Church and the Bible condemned, getting priests off the hook for all kinds of seduction and even murder of their victims if they threatened to expose them. Blaise Pascal was one of many who took them on for all that. Many many books were written over th3e centuries exposing their various plots.

    They set themselves to be THE support6ers of the papacy and made themselves indispensible to many Popes. But they also readily assassinated Popes as well as kings when necessary to further their plans and became feared by leaders all over Europe. They became known as murderers and corrupters and were kicked out of many nations, including Catholic nations.

    Getting themselves into positions where they could influence political leaders is something they always try to do. They still do this. We now have a Jesuit chaplain of Congress, apparently a first. They did their thing there as they always do. And nobody thinks anything of it.

    They were behind the St. Bartholomew's massacre and the tortures of the Inquisition in general.

    They are still working tirelessly to infiltrate, influence, corrupt, insinuate destructive ideas into the minds of youth, whatever might serve their cause of making the Pope the kind of the world and all nations subservient to him, AND bring back the Inquisition which would put all us nonCatholics through all kinds of tortures.

    I hope some might go look through the books I've listed on my Catholicism blog where all this information can be found, but I'm not organized enough to give specific sources yet.

    ReplyDelete
  6. KING of the world, not kind.

    Again, blog link is
    http://enemyofchrist.blogspot.com/

    I get a lot of this from Chris Pinto's films and radio shows, but he gives sources such as the books I've listed.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Some of those books demonstrate that Catholicism is definitely socialistic and anti-capitalistic. Ecclesiastical Megalomania is a book that argues that.

    Other books show the Jesuits specifically promoting Marxism. Well we know there is such a thing as Liberation Theology which is a Catholic socialist "theology." They provide refuge for illegal aliens among other things.

    Skim through some of the online books on my list and click on interesting sounding titles.

    ReplyDelete
  8. By the way it is sometimes Catholics themselves, even Jesuits themselves, or ex-Jesuits, who write these books as they've come to recognize the corruption, the evil, the danger, in these things and set themselves to expose it all.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Lord Acton, for instance, who was a converted Catholic, devoted much work to exposing the evils of the papacy, though he never left the religion.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Much too big a subject to delve into with any semblance of depth right now, Connie, but thanks for explaining further.

    Do you think it's possible that the ideas that founded our country have been powerful enough to change or ameliorate the views of people of various ethnic, religious and economic backgrounds who came here as immigrants?

    Dennis Prager, himself, a religious Jew, has publicly stated on the air that "The United States has made a better people of Jews who settled here."

    I heard him say just that in nearly those exact words. Certainly a rare admission for one of his inordinately prideful faith and ethnicity.

    Roman Catholics too have changed a great deal even in my lifetime. The allegiance to Rome as the Seat of Supreme Infallible Authority may be paid lip service, but few Americans believe in it or live by it anymore.

    Times change. Fashions change. Labels change. Under the surface, however, people, themselves, never do. Human nature remains as fractious, disputatious, quarrelsome, and full of greed, envy, spite and malice as ever.

    People ALSO are always in search of Someone -- a Superior, All-Wise, All-Knowing Figure of Limitless Strength -- to order them about, tell them what to do, because most people are to dull-witted, too mentally lazy, too ignorant or too fearful to do what is necessary to direct their own course.

    This eagerness to FOLLOW is the source of much-if-not-all of what keeps us living in "confused alarums of struggle and flight -- on a darkling plane where ignorant armies clash by night."

    ~ FreeThinke

    ReplyDelete
  11. Who is to blame?

    We are.

    I really hope you read what I have to say before skewering me, because what I have to say is important (in my world anyway).

    We are to blame for being pariahs. In the 70's or 80's, I'm too lazy to look up which, we helped to put a psychopath into power. And then when Saddam got all itchy, we took him out. We helped the Iranians overthrow the Shah, and look how that turned out.

    Our foreign affairs record in the last forty years should be enough to explain why the world hates us, but I'm guessing it's probably not enough for some of you. So lets look at American culture.

    Last year, our GNP was $15 trillion, TWICE that of China who came in second. We are a country that doesn't even go broke the same as everyone else. We have a recession, and we still completely dwarf the rest of the planet. We are a nation of immense wealth, yet we piss and moan when we're told that we have to help those less fortunate.

    We've got people in this country that weigh over 400 pounds, while small children in Africa are starving to death.

    Out of the top 10 wealthiest people on the planet, 4 of them are American and have a combined wealth of nearly $171 billion.

    We can no longer educate our children, because parents have given up responsibility for their children's education.

    Or government is largely a sham anymore, with two ruling parties that are becoming increasingly polarized and radical in their platforms. Our congress has trouble performing even its most basic constitutional function: passing an annual budget.

    An actor makes millions of dollars off of one movie, meanwhile a school teacher barely makes enough to survive and pay off his/her student loans.

    There is so much wrong with this country, and yet we have people who still wonder why everyone hates us.

    Obama is not the problem. George W. Bush was not the problem. WE are the problem. And until WE figure that out, until we stop pretending that our shit doesn't stink and stop believing that we're right even when we're wrong, the world will not change its perception of America.

    They hate us because we are obsecenely, immorally decadent. They hate us because we're arrogant. They hate us because we wield our military like a pitbull. As much as I love America--because to me, "America" represents an ideal which we strive to achieve--I have to say that the world hates us with good reason.

    We abandoned the struggle to achieve that ideal about forty years ago. Why should they like us? Just because we keep them safe? Just because we give them money?

    Anyone who believes that our charity and promise of protectino is reason enough for the world to love us should be ashamed of themselves.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I do think that America may influence people for the better. It's true that American Catholics are more independent of the Vatican than others, that's a good thing.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Is this the Westbrook Pegler column?

    ReplyDelete
  14. Jack,

    With all due respect you sound more like a doctrinaire egalitarian with utopian yearnings than anything else.

    The only way to make the world a better place is to pitch in and do whatever you can with whatever you have to uplift, enrich and bring cheer to whomever and whatever is within your immediate grasp.

    It can't be accomplished by CHIDING your fellow creatures for not having done better.

    Bitching and moaning feeds on itself, infects others with a spirit of discontent that soon turns to anger, hopelessness and despair.


    "Love your life, poor as it is. You may, perhaps, have some pleasant, thrilling, glorious hours even in a poorhouse. The setting sun is reflected as brightly from the windows of an almshouse as from a rich man's abode."

    "Men will lie on their backs, talking about the fall of man, and never make an effort to get up."


    ~ Thoreau (1817-1862)

    Even on your darkest days look always for reasons to rejoice, and never succumb to anger, cynicism and despair.

    What it all boils down to is this: The only person you have the power to improve is yourself.

    ~ FreeThinke

    ReplyDelete
  15. Ducky!

    Thank you so much for reminding me of the late, great Westbrook Pegler, who died in 1969.

    How I wish I were the equal of Mr. Pegler -- a fine gentleman and possibly the last prominent journalist who knew -- or cared accurately to report -- the score.

    His animadversions on "Moosejaw" FDR and the pious pratings of Eleanor, FDR's shrill, buck-toothed, big-mouthed bride, whom Pegler publicly referred to as "La Boca Grande," are happy reminders of the the Golden Days before America completely lost her mind.

    Mr. Pegler's first wife happened to have been a Jewess from Tennessee, but even that could not save his reputation from the ravages of the crypto-Marxian Journalistic Establishment that secured a firm grip on absolute power in the years immediately following World War Two.

    ~ FreeThinke

    ReplyDelete
  16. You asked a question, FT, and I gave an answer.

    Hopeless hope does not amount to apathy, and despair does not necessarily lead to surrender.

    One thing I've learned is that more than anything, people want to ignore the problems we face so they can feel uplifted, as you say. But that's the reason that everything is so screwed up: because no one wants to admit the truth. How many parents want to admit that it's THEIR OWN fault that their kids are stupid? How many rich people want to admit that they are morally culpable for hoarding their wealth while other suffer? (Yes, I realize that the insanely wealthy give very generously to charity, but it's telling that it only accounts for a tiny fraction of what they are worth).

    I'm not a Commie, nor do I dream of Utopia. But if dreaming of a society in which injustice is rectified rather than rewarded or worse, ignored, then I guess I am dreaming of Utopia.

    ReplyDelete
  17. I've been trying to understand this idea of oligarchs or a select elite operating in the shadows for a long time, and from whichever direction I approach this it seems to lead to a recurring family name which directs a lot of evil in the West today. The West for this thesis would be the Americas — North, South and Central America — the Rockefellers.

    Since you've mentioned the Holocaust and Hitler why not point to the powers behind the throne that directed Hitler? The German business class was sympathetic with Hitler and one of the biggest companies in the world that provided support and chemicals to the National Socialists and Hitler was I. G. Farben. They were the company that manufactured Zyklon B the gas that was used in concentration camps to commit the mass murder of many citizens including a disproportionate number of Jews.

    I.G. Farben was partially owned by Standard Oil of New Jersey and this company provided some fuel products to the Nazis which could not be provided by I. G. Farben. So Hitlers war machine would not have rolled very far without the able assistance of Standard Oil. When so-called Nazi hunters drag some long ago immigrant to the West before the courts for "war crimes" these detectives look like Inspector Clouseau — they are so good at finding some small perpetrator of crimes against humanity and yet the biggest criminals are conveniently are never mentioned anywhere. Why the hell don't these self-righteous snoops call a spade and identify the Rockefeller clan a criminal operation which makes any Mafia family look like small fry?

    This same clan can be found as being the bank that funded the expansion of the Soviet Union and also China and Mao Ze Dong. Try adding up the numbers of lives lost in wars of the 20th Century and the efforts to establish world communism and we are not talking about some small criminal oligarch but and industrial-type mafia family.

    So here's my question: Since this family has been so dominant for the last 100 years why should it be surprising that as they tighten the noose to control all aspects of life on the planet that we seem to be drowning in such a sea of evil that it is barely comprehensible, describable, or most important of all, understandable?

    ReplyDelete
  18. “Some... believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others… to build a more integrated global political and economic structure – one world, if you will.
    If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.
     
    "We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nation will accept the New World Order."



    ~ David Rockefeller speaking at a UN Business Conference, Sept. 14, 1994

    _____________________________
     
    David Rockefeller On Control of the Media:

    "We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries."

    ~ David Rockefeller Baden-Baden, Germany 1991
     

    ReplyDelete
  19. "Hopeless hope does not amount to apathy, and despair does not necessarily lead to surrender."

    How so? Sounds self-contradictory to me.

    Please elucidate.

    ~ FT

    ReplyDelete
  20. A while ago I watched an interview of David Rockefeller with Charlie Rose on Bloomberg Television. He related an interesting anecdote which perhaps shows he's not quite as confident as some of his quotations and the attitudes of some of his minions seem to be.

    While he was negotiating the sale of Rockefeller Center to Japanese interests years ago, he was in Japan to meet with some of the buyers and he fell down on the street and couldn't get up because he had broken his leg. He couldn't believe that people didn't stop to help him since he was in difficulty. I thought that must have made him feel right at home, since New York itself has a similar reputation. And maybe those smart Japanese sensed the Satanic vibes that only the demonically possessed can transmit.

    ReplyDelete
  21. "...curious though it may seem to our ears conditioned as they've been by years decades upon decades of surreptitious, subtle, and blatantly seductive Marxist Propaganda and Obfuscation -- that HITLER was a virulent anti-COMMUNIST".

    To put to rest that BIG LIE look up the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact which was an agreement signed a very short time before Poland was invaded. This pact was an agreement between Stalin and Hitler that Poland was going to be divided between these two supposed "enemies". Hitler invaded Poland from the west and two weeks later Stalin invaded Poland from the east and Poland was divided between these two powers.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Since the Vatican is not only the home of the Catholic Church but it's also a country unto itself. Not many individuals or institutions can make that claim. But one can certainly see in reading or listening to the words of the Pope that he's on board with world government so I'm sure once the rulers of the world are identified that the Pope will have a seat at the table.

    But that is a huge topic and since the Catholic Church has been around on this Earth for longer than any other institution we can assume that they've had some part in how the world has evolved for better or worse over the last two millenia.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Yes, I forgot to mention the fact that the Vatican is a political entity, a Nation State, essentially a monarchy with the Pope at its head.

    What surprised me was not that they had "some part" in how the world has evolved, but just how feverishly they've worked at influencing the world, specifically against Protestant nations and Protestantism in all its forms, including the King James Bible for instance, but also toward a One World Order. Which they expect the Pope to rule.

    ReplyDelete
  24. could the pope be the antichrist?

    that would be a hoot.

    ReplyDelete
  25. All the Protestant Reformers identified the Pope, or the papacy, as the Antichrist.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Chris Pinto's radio program for October 1 is about Tge German Push for a EU Superpresident and EU army as well as a new law in France promoting gay rights. Pinto's position is that the EU is shaping up under influences from Rome toward a new Holy Roman Empire or the Fourth Reich.

    Radio show link Or if that doesn't work: http://www.noiseofthunder.com/storage/NOTR_EU.ARMY_10.01.12.mp3

    ReplyDelete

IF YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND THE FOLLOWING, YOU DON'T BELONG HERE, SO KINDLY GET OUT AND STAY OUT.

We welcome Conversation
But without Vituperation.
If your aim is Vilification ––
Other forms of Denigration ––
Unfounded Accusation --
Determined Obfuscation ––
Alienation with Self-Justification ––
We WILL use COMMENT ERADICATION.


IN ADDITION

Gratuitous Displays of Extraneous Knowledge Offered Not To Shed Light Or Enhance the Discussion, But For The Primary Purpose Of Giving An Impression Of Superiority are obnoxiously SELF-AGGRANDIZING, and therefore, Subject to Removal at the Discretion of the Censor-in-Residence.