Friday, April 24, 2015


Who Would Be YOUR Nominee 
for the 
BIGGEST 
in the 
BLOGOSPHERE?
P l e a s e  b e  S e r i o u s

70 comments:

  1. Are we allowed to nominate ourselves?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Why, THERSITES! I would never say that of YOU.

      There are ever so many more far more eminently qualified for the designation.

      Could you be practicing DEFLECTION? };-)

      I've never known you to be coy.

      Delete
    2. As you can see, FT, I do have my followers! Thanks, jez. ;)

      Being an *hole isn't an insult, IMO. It's a statement of a certain "under-appreciated" strength of character, likened to an "immovable" object.

      Delete
    3. There are no depths too low or positions too dirty that can shake, move, or break that object.

      Delete
    4. Yes. I've noticed that in many on numerous occasions, T-man, but in most cases I could never consider it a VIRTUE, mon ami. For you I might make an exception, but Alack! it must be conditional. >;-{

      Delete
    5. Your definition, Thersites, differs considerably from mine and most of the rest of us commoners.

      Delete
  2. No contest, it's SHAW!

    Her followers are a close second, the Regested Nurse leads the list afterwards.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. FT prefers us to refer to that entity as OCTOMOM now, since she's become inseparable from the grasp of that obnoxious creature's tentacles and indistinguishable from his odious identity.

      -- Figalena Jackson

      Delete
    2. Welcome, Jonathan Goldsmith! I have yet to taste Dos Equis, but I eagerly look forward to the pleasure.

      Is it really true that you practically have to beat the girls off with a club?

      Now, if you could bottle that je ne said quoi you have in super-abundance, you might not be obliged to make beer commercials anymore –– or do you just enjoy doing that for the helluvit?

      Anyway, so glad you've come out as a reliable, rock solid conservative. Always good to see you here.

      EXCELSIOR!

      Delete
  3. Registered Nurse, The Duck fellow, Jerky McJaggoff, the delicate little sea urchin who shrieks and pisses, the Lester Liberal dingbat,

    i'll think up more later

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't put JMJ in that category, myself, since he's done no discernible harm with his antics. Otherwise, you are spot on.

      Delete
  4. B. Devlin said

    I nominate MITCH McCONNELL, the stinkin' RINO bastard who just unblocked the nomination of that black commie bitch and made it possible for her to take over where Holder left off. There's no asshole like a stinkin' RINO asshole.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Excellent choice. Possibly not exactly what FT had in mind, but you make a good point in emphasizing something far more important than the pesky little gnats and mosquitoes that act like ants in a picnic basket. The man you spotlighted is not a fool. Instead he is a grave danger to the health of this nation. I'm with FT one-hundred percent in his desire to cut the dead wood out of the GOP and make it a genuinely conservative party instead of the sham it has become since Ronald Reagan left office.

      -------------------> Katharine Heartburn

      Delete
  5. Oh, dear!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Ah Yes, the the little pathic Shit head, Sea Creature.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Now who could that possibly be? I haven't the foggiest idea. Please elucidate.

      Delete
  7. Charleston BlackbottemApril 24, 2015 at 10:50 AM

    “Here's to the crazy ones. The misfits. The rebels. The troublemakers. The round pegs in the square holes. The ones who see things differently. They're not fond of rules. And they have no respect for the status quo. You can quote them, disagree with them, glorify or vilify them. About the only thing you can't do is ignore them. Because they change things. They push the human race forward. And while some may see them as the crazy ones, we see genius. Because the people who are crazy enough to think they can change the world, are the ones who do.”

    How do you seer change?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Artie Conan-Watsondoyle said

      But soft! Methinks the unmistakable
      Scent of nurse tracks doth this post befoul.

      Fee Fi Fo Fum!
      I smell the scent of an unwiped bum.
      Be it here or be it there
      It must be gone from FreeThinke's lair.

      Delete
    2. You may be into something Artie. Let's see how it pans out.

      Delete
  8. "The misfits. The rebels. The troublemakers. The dirty dread-locked potheads. The round pegs in the square holes. The peace, love, and happiness, Tree Hugging morons. The people who just can't shake off the Clinton Sleaze. Well, .Boo Hoo. Your candidate is a sleaze, you can't admit that straight out...but you are so married to the Democratic Party, that you would vote for a known sleaze, before opening your eyes and looking around!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Charleston BlackbottemApril 24, 2015 at 11:35 AM

      This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      Delete
  9. Where did you collect that specimen?

    ReplyDelete
  10. There are so many on these boards that it would take a platoon of proctologists to determine who is the winner. My vote goes to the defenders of the Benghazi coverup. Namely Shaw, Octopus, and the Dope aka Ducky, Dave Miller, and a very close Also-Ran would be Rational Nation USA .

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Put 'em in reverse order, and you'll have it just right.

      >> Goode Proctorologist

      Delete
  11. There Are So many Ass-Holes On These Forums that It’s Hard to Pick Only One. I For One Would Like To Pick Barack Hussain Obama... It Is Too Bad That The First Black Man To Be The President Was Barack Obama. Barack Obama Is Clearly The Worst President in American History. He Is Really Making it Hard for Another Black Man to Seek the Office. Without a Doubt Most Americans Will Remember the Color of His Skin, after All Most Are Accused of Being Racist Anyway and Those That Are Not Openly Voted for Him Because of His Race. At Any Rate Obama Sucks.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. CONGRATULATIONS!

      YOU qualify for the VIOLATOR of the ANTI-BOILERPLATE STATUTE of the DAY award.

      Delete
  12. HEY!!!

    Who hijacked my toilet cam???

    ReplyDelete
  13. Is that a Picture of a Rectum or a Virgina?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Emilio de Lisle said

      What a stupid question! Anyone with half a brain should be able to see it's Hillary Clinton's mouth before she puts in her dentures and puts on her lipstickl

      Delete
    2. what a good looking sphincter

      Delete
    3. It's not what it appears to be. It's an oasis in the Sahara that got filled in by a mammoth sandstorm photographed from above by a drone.

      See how foolish it is to jump to conclusions?

      Delete
  14. Gay porn is just wrong!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Blasphema de Vout said

      But heterosexual porn is all right in your eyes and those of the Lord, Sarah baby? Your theology is anything but sound, my dear.

      Delete
  15. Congratulations to that other douchbag Attorney General Loretta Lynch

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Please take note of B. Devlin's excellent pst made earlier today, and Ms. Heartburn's equally fine response. I know you'll be pleased.

      Delete
  16. When a slime bag like Hilderbeast has nothing new to offer, she offers more of her old slime, repackaged so people will think it's not as putrid as her original crap like the the rest of the current slime bag in the White House’s frauds directly within the communist administration.
    As much as I WOULD ABSOLUTELY LOVE to see a female president!!! As it stands, I really hope that Hillary Clinton doesn't win, or better yet doesn't run. Just like I wanted to see a non-white president, but did not want a president like Obama, whatsoever. I knew he would cause more problems than Bush (and B. Clinton, and G.H.W. Bush before) and sure enough, I was right!
    Hillary will be like having obama all over again. Most blacks voted for obama only because he's half black without knowing anything else about him, Most woman will vote for Hillary only because she is a woman without knowing anything else about her. A sad thing to base you're vote on. Like husband like wife. I would have thought that Americans will never choose a liar like Hillary, but then again Americans did choose Obama. The biggest liar of them all.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And YOU are First Runner-Up as today's VIOLATOR of the ANTi-BOILERPLATE STATUE in Our Bylaws.

      CONGRATULATIONS!

      Delete
  17. To me, there are a few sorts of a'holes on the blogosphere. People who moderate or ban or otherwise censor not because of any great flow of spam or attacks but just because once in a while someone writes something they don't like. Often these are also people who trade in disinformation, another sort of a'hole's thing to do, and when called out, they ban, moderate or censor. Then there's the speciously touchy people. Say one word they don't like, regardless of the context, and you can be sure that word will be the subject of all discourse with this person from then on. Great for obfuscation.

    Z would be a example of the first, AoW is an example of the first and second, and dmarks has one weirdly touchy side, but I wouldn't call him an a'hole (I think he's genuinely touchy).

    Sophists, propagandists, ideologues, demagogues, and such, these are all in the eye of the beholder. I asked you, FT, the other day what you thought of Ted Cruz, someone I would apply all four of the above designations plus definitely "a'hole," and you thought just the opposite. To me, for someone to be an a'hole, a real dirty low life, they have to be up to no good, intentionally spreading disinformation, and/or censoring anyone who disagrees with them.

    JMJ

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Fair enough, Jersey, only I have to say it's a shame that you and AOW misunderstand each other so badly.

      You know, I kinda like you in spite of yourself. ;-) You remind me in some ways of the little girl with the curl right in the middle of her forehead –– she of Mother Goose fame.

      When you are good, you at least make sense, and I enjoy taking with, even though we disagree most of the time, but when you are bad, you just talk sheer nonsense.

      You're a bit like Jekyll and Hyde. but I think the REAL you is the Jekyll part.

      Talk more later, if you like.

      FT

      Delete
    2. "it's a shame that you and AOW misunderstand each other so badly."

      That is a misrepresentation of the situation. AOW suffers under no misunderstanding. Jersey personally insulted her, so she zapped him, which is well within her right. Nobody has to put up with that crap in their own house of they don't want to.

      Jersey is a foul-mouthed, low-brow, doctrinaire leftwing loon incapable of holding a normal conversation with those he disagrees with. When he runs out of intellectual ammo (which invariably is within the initial exchange) he resorts to name-calling, so the buffoon gets what's coming to him.

      I'm no psychologist, but I would lay a substantial bet he gets some kind of thrill up his leg from all the negative attention, kinda like an unfunny, poorly-executed copy of a cheap imitation of Borat.

      Delete
    3. To answer the question asked in your headline?

      Ducky

      That picture should be his flag.

      Delete
    4. SF,
      Thank you for the support.

      I put up with enough "brats" during school hours, so I have little patience with "brats" at my blog.

      Delete
    5. Asshole? I like to think that's because you turtle just like z every time your world view is challenged.

      However, I don't like to stoop to name calling although I know I lapse.

      I have a couple of names I could toss off but given the environment I'll decline. It's a pointless exercise that should be reserved for people of low intelligence or Freethinke's brand of mental illness.

      Delete
    6. RAMALAMADINGDONG! BINGO! SHAZAM! BAZOOKAMAMA!

      And the Grand Prix du Jour goes to ––––––––––CANARDO!!! easily THE most obnoxious personality in the blogosphere TODAY

      A ten-pound pile of gilded Horse Manure mounted on a hand-chiseled plaque of genuine petrified DInosaur Dung will be sent to your address in Everett, Massachusetts forthwith.

      Delete
    7. I will give Ducky credit. He rarely calls his interlocutors names. His passive-aggressive manner of riling people is to do third-party name calling at people his enemies like. His grand specialty is the hit and run job.

      Ducky: Admit it, you love being despised by those on your right.

      Delete
  18. Oh teah, I almost forgot, but talking about assholes reminded me, that Picture could very well be Jersey McJones

    ReplyDelete
  19. If you're looking for someone to win the "Asshole of the year" award, look no further, he just arrived, and his name is Jersey McJones

    ReplyDelete
  20. My vote? FreeThinke.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You're late! I've been expecting that since the wee hours of the morning. Fee better now that you've gotten it out of your system?

      Delete
  21. Oh yeah, I forgot the other kind of a'hole - people who just post pointless ad hominem nonsense with no substance whatsoever. Though, to be fair, I suspect they're just kind of dumb, low IQ types, who just don't know any better.

    JMJ

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Betty Battles, Sgt, USAApril 24, 2015 at 1:52 PM

      This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      Delete
    2. We ALL do that from time to time. YOU are no exception, Jersey. Neither am I. It's the ones who are truly NASTY that I despise. I'd never put you in that category.I'm sorry others do. I see you have a good heart, even if you are wring much of the time. ;-)

      Delete
    3. a blind old man trying to lure a wombat with "here, kitty kitty"

      Delete
    4. Betty Battles, Sgt, USAApril 24, 2015 at 7:37 PM

      This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      Delete
    5. I don't even know these people talking about me, so I don't know what you're talking about. When someone posts something nasty, I'll post something nasty right back at 'em. But for some folks, nastiness is all they have.

      JMJ

      Delete
    6. Pssssssssssst! Hey Jersey. Try to remember this:

      "A soft answer turneth away wrath."

      In case yu don't know that means being nice to nasty people tends to neutralize their unpleasantness and take the sting out of their bitter, accusatory, unforgiving rhetoric.

      Try it. It works, unless you are a genuine rage addict, which I suspect too many are, but not you.

      Your Secret Pal

      Delete
    7. I'm not a rage addict. I'm a debate addict, but not a rage addict. I think that's why I have a particular distaste for the really, really backwards. I love a good debate, I hate a bad one. I don't give a rats ass about wrath. My wrath is worse anyway. And I'm not trying to win them over. At that point, I'm just calling a spade a spade.

      When people just flat out lie, however, about really important, life or death, gravely consequential matters, that's just shit. Just flat out lowly, scummy, lying there on the earth accumulating flies, shit. And there's way too much of it piled on the web these days.

      I'm on loan to another location at my work for the month. On the second day I was there I tried to get a lay of the intellectual landscape, so I brought up how we were looking forward to yet another Bush-Clinton election, just like 92. A manager there remarked, "The President is a Muslim, ya' know." Lying has consequences, secret friend. A healthy normal response should be to recoil from it.

      JMJ

      Delete
    8. My oh my, is that your Ass or your mouth!April 25, 2015 at 7:04 AM

      Oh Just STFU aleardy!!!!!

      Delete
    9. The Ghost of Thomas PaineApril 25, 2015 at 7:54 AM

      Have you ever witnessed such unfounded rage and hate Jersey?? Just goes to show ya what the thumpers are really made of.

      Delete
  22. I see that I made somebody's list. LOL!

    ReplyDelete
  23. Let's see....Whom would I nominate?

    Hard to say.

    The one who first springs to mind is "John Brown," who makes all others of the ilk look like nothing problematic. "John Brown" was a plague back in 2006 -- if I have my timeline correct.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I remember JB. Quite the hard case for a while...

      Delete
    2. Fortunately, I never encountered your John Brown, but if I had to name ONE from all my experience in the this game, I could not. There are TWO who stand out as far and away THE Most Qualified for The Title for All Time:

      SOCRATES from the days at FrontPage Magazine

      BEAMISH from the years I wasted trying to "get through" at Geeeez

      Among the current crop who frequent OUR blogs, all of whom have been mentioned amply by others, so I don't need to, I wouldn't give the bastard the satisfaction of knowing how successful "it" has been in getting me to divert my attention from things that matter to "it," instead.

      Delete
    3. I think Beamish has mental issues

      Delete
    4. Could you name anyone who doesn't –– other than thee and me, of course? ;-)

      Delete
  24. The Award for THE WITTIEST EXCHANGE of the DAY goes to EMILIO De LISLE:

    Jus Askin: Is that a Picture of a Rectum or a Virgina?

    Emilio de Lisle: What a stupid question! Anyone with half a brain should be able to see it's Hillary Clinton's mouth before she puts in her dentures and puts on her lipstick!

    BRAVO, Emilio! You may come back and visit us anytime.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Confuse Us say...

    Man who try to befriend fat, blabbermouth baboon end up monkey's uncle!

    ReplyDelete
  26. Reverend Billy Jim HollerApril 24, 2015 at 8:11 PM

    Friends! I smell the smoke of satan in this here house of gay porn.

    Flagrant anus baring has no place in Christian society, and the language. The language! Satan and his demons are laughing. Laughing!

    Godless liberalism is destroying this nation that God has blesses so richly.

    Shame. Shame on us all!

    ReplyDelete

IF YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND THE FOLLOWING, YOU DON'T BELONG HERE, SO KINDLY GET OUT AND STAY OUT.

We welcome Conversation
But without Vituperation.
If your aim is Vilification ––
Other forms of Denigration ––
Unfounded Accusation --
Determined Obfuscation ––
Alienation with Self-Justification ––
We WILL use COMMENT ERADICATION.


IN ADDITION

Gratuitous Displays of Extraneous Knowledge Offered Not To Shed Light Or Enhance the Discussion, But For The Primary Purpose Of Giving An Impression Of Superiority are obnoxiously SELF-AGGRANDIZING, and therefore, Subject to Removal at the Discretion of the Censor-in-Residence.