Wednesday, October 14, 2015



HILLARY EMERGES 
CLEAR WINNER
Rehabilitates Her Image
through the expert, polished application of 
poised, good-humored 
BRAZEN EFFRONTERY


She has perfected her act, was able to sweep aside all negative assertions as to her character and motivation, and was given much support by her closest, supposedly fiercest rival Bernie Sanders. 

And we must admit 
SHE LOOKED ATTRACTIVE.

O’MALLEY acted as a tall, dignified, well-spoken PROP in a pageant-like showcase designed to glorify Mrs. Clinton

Only Jim Webb, rudely treated by moderator, Anderson Cooper, as though Webb were a party crasher, and Lincoln Chaffee, a pleasant-but-fatuous-looking individual who appeared foolish by continually reminding us that he has never been associated with even a hint of scandal in his career seemed mildly at odds with the 
CLINTON BOOSTING EVENT.

What's wrong with this picture?

144 comments:

  1. stomp, snort, and gruntOctober 14, 2015 at 7:30 AM

    Indeed no surprises at the democratic debate.

    Issues articulated well and candidate responses were pretty much as anticipated.

    Drawing stark contrasts between the republican candidates values and vision for America and their own and the democratic party's vision.

    As it should be.

    The future of America hangs in the balance and awaits the people's decision in November 2016.

    Meanwhile more debates to come.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You see no irony in the obviously well-planned, carefully contrived, staged event?

      And what were the "issues" every one of them save Jim Webb deliberately chose to ignore?

      What constitutional principles were these smiling, poised, well-dressed, dignified people eager to violate and blithely cast aside?

      Did you not see that this was in essence an INFO-MERCIAL designed to promote the candidacy of H. Rodham Clinton?

      We have discussed –– ad nauseam –– the current condition of the Republican Party, which is clearly in SCHISM.

      I see that as healthy and vitally necessary. The opposition, of course, wants to mischaracterize it as evidence of hopeless disarray.

      We'll have to see how it plays itself out, but if we abandon ourselves to out and out socialism, which IS the true identity of the modern Democratic Party, I see no hope that we may survive as a free, prosperous and independent nation.

      We will go the way of Greece, and NO ONE will LIKE it, save The Oligarchs into whose hands we have indolently permitted ourselves to fall.

      "Under the spreading chestnut tree
      Where I sold you, and you sold me."


      ~ George Orwell - in Nineteen-Eighty-Four

      Delete
  2. Brilliant analysis!

    What we witnessed last night was a Potemkin debate in a Potemkin nomination race. Hillary's "opponents" are stage actor foils meant to make her look good.

    Bernie Sanders telling everyone to stop talking about Hillary's criminal conduct in her classified e-mail scandal?

    Marty O'Malley apologizing every time he disagreed with Her Rotten Heinousness?

    Good ol' Bolshevik Bernie ladling out great steaming globs of government largess, damn the price tag.

    The Democrat party "nomination" process is right out of the old Soviet Union, Chavez's Venezuela or Iran's Mullahocracy.

    Sure, there are elections, with a choice of candidates, but the conclusion is neve in doubt. Remember how Saddam got 99% of the vote?

    The Democrat party is a de facto Progressive Politburo, and Hellary Rotten Clinton is the next Soviet Premier.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you. I am so glad that at least one person actually "got it."

      Delete
    2. Modeste B. Kawes said

      ME TOO!

      Delete
  3. Are you kidding me? Is the best that the Democrats have?

    If it is, then I can’t wait for the debate between the two parties, no matter who they are.. Those people on stage are a bunch of pandering idiots preaching to each other's choir. There is no difference between them whatsoever, and Republicans are afraid of none of them. Good luck Democrats (if that’s what you really call yourselves) , you will need it!

    I was shocked to see that bunch of old fogies in that geriatric side-show , slapping each-other on their backs, kissing each others behinds! Did they really come there to debate or to push Hillary over the top and make excuses for her behavior, her lies, and cover-ups! And to say “enough of Hillary’s E-mails”! Was he kidding, and then to talk about ethics?
    This party of left-wing losers wasn’t a debate! It’s no wonder they are called “Leftards” ! Personally, I’d call them a lot worse.
    One Jackass saying “I’m against it, the other saying . I’m for it. and Hillary stood there with that stupid looking GRIN on her sour face!

    Bernie the Socialist wants to break up he banks. So does that Mummy O'Malley, and Hillary doesn't. And they called that issue more significant that the email scandals ?
    And did you see the way the brushed over Benghazi so fast! I guess that wasn’t “significant” enough either! But then again, what difference did it make (to that bunch)!
    No one wanted to nail Hillary’s ass to the post when it was so easy to.

    One moron, was for the Iran deal, two were is against it, the other one didn’t even know who Iran was! LOL He just wanted to break up the banks! After that he was lost.
    And the funny part is that after reading some of the Liberal blogs, all the losers are declaring a victory!
    The only adult there was Webb, which the analyst claimed should be a Republican. And that was most probably the only truth that was said the entire night. And the poor guy, kept saying, “how cone I’m getting as much time as the others” ... well DUH! Maybe because he made too much sense, or because he might have actually said something that was made sense ! Debate? There wasn’t anything there that would even pass for as a debate! Just a bunch of far-left progressive nut-jobs pandering..

    ReplyDelete
  4. I believe it was a very informative debate. Hillary looked good and I believe she will surpass Mr. Sanders and gain the nomination.

    Then, how can the American people not elect such a qualified woman?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anyone who calls themselves an American and tries to rationalize the sanity of any of those candidates (Psychopaths), causes me loads of concern!

      Delete
    2. As responsible citizens, we must evaluate all candidates and choose wisely. Hillary Clinton has very good experience. She and Jim Webb are the most qualified, but Mr. Webb looks scary, like he is ready to kill someone with his bear hands!

      Delete
    3. Bear hands? The scary white man... somebody call 911

      Delete
    4. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      Delete
    5. FJ: The cartoon is quite funny!

      English is not my first language, but I do not resent such corrections.

      Delete
    6. H. Rodham Clinton proved herself capable of only ONE thing:

      Long years of kicking around in the political arena have enabled her to develop an incredibly thick skin, and to lie with a straight face. Long years of practice fueled by overweening personal ambition [the Greeks called it Hubris] have made it possible for her and her Consort in Corruption to develop an uncanny ability to pull the wool over the eyes of far too big a percentage of the electorate.

      In truth the Clintons stand for nothing but Limitless Venality.

      Delete
  5. Sanders says the biggest national security threat is climate change!

    I'd say that the Biggest threat would be having any one of those Clowns win the presidency!

    ReplyDelete
  6. After last night's debate, I am more convinced than ever the Dems are going to sweep big in '16. The House will remain a problem for a while, though, and it's a terrible shame as the country really needs a good people's House right now.

    JMJ

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And the Moon is really a big Pizza

      Delete
    2. With Ben Carson taking 90% of the black vote, hows THAT going to happen?

      Delete
    3. Rheinhardt Angers RackleyOctober 14, 2015 at 11:02 AM

      No, fathead, it will be responsible adults sweeping the Dem Dung and broken pieces of our nation and our society off the floor once the Dumbest and Worst President in History FINALLY leaves office.

      Only socialist stooges like you and Ema will vote Hillary the Iron Fist or Bolshevik Bernie, and you are a small percentage, thank GOD!!!

      No, your kookball lineup belongs on the wall of the Post Office and they are scaring the normals. I see the GOP cleaning up in more ways than one.

      Delete
    4. Okaaayyy...

      Most voters do not think like you guys. You are fringe right wing Republicans and conservatives. Odds have now, the Democrats will win the White House and the Senate in 2016. They will win the popular vote for House members but because of gerrymandering, the GO will retain the House - representing fewer people, but still in the majority. This will only last so long. After the 2020 census, that will no longer be tenable, and the House GOP will be back in the political wilderness for another 40 years like they were until the early 90's. None of this is news, or radical, or wishful thinking. It is a likely scenario.

      JMJ

      Delete
    5. You really think that Blacks are going to vote for Whitebread Bernie? Do you really think that Black men will vote for Shrillary over Ben?

      Ben isn't "fringe". He's not even "right".

      Delete
    6. Of course Jersey,who doesn't want a free lunch?

      Delete
    7. One factor working against Bernie Sanders no one has mentioned yet, FJ, is this: Most inner-city Negroes harbor a deep hatred for JEWS, despite the hyper-leftist, Marxian-style activism Jews have perpetrated for over a century.

      Blacks also loath and despise Koreans and other Asians. I think I know the reason behind their hatred of Asians, but I don't quite get it about the Jews?

      Of course, at root MOST people dislike Jews for these reasons: They are aggressive, highly accomplished, have achieved a great deal, are very adept at handling money, AND too many of them tend to be overbearing, loudly self-congratulatory, notoriously IMMODEST, and refuse to accept criticism without screaming ANTI-SEMITISM!!! at the top of their lungs. Also, they rarely-if-ever back down, even if they've been proven wrong.

      What else could it be that might account for Black anti-Semitism?

      Delete
    8. FJ, Ben Carson is a crazy idiot. He will not be the nomination, and is he by some miracle was, he would lose by a landslide.

      FT, I don't think you know enough younger back people to have an opinion on this, but I can tell you for a fact, most blacks are nothing like what you're describing. They will support whoever they feel represents their best interests, like any other constituency, except of course for lower class white conservatives, who pretty much always vote against their own best interests because it is THEY who are the ones so easily distracted by HATE.

      JMJ

      Delete
  7. After reading these incoherent, illiterate rants from the usual TGOPers, these blogs, and news sites to see how Hillary's amazing debate performance shook the Goopers to their very bones as they contemplate a Hillary Clinton presidency. Who else they got? A guy whose only accomplishments are 4 bankruptcies and putting his name in Yuuuge letters on buildings while telling everyone wholl listen that he's the greatest? Another guy who thinks anyone not like him is a Nazi and who has trouble staying awake while talking, and finally a woman who was proved to be an unapologetic liar on the Planned parenthood tapes and who almost ruined on of American's best high tech companies and laid of 30,000 workers while giving herself millions of dollars in a golden parachute. The GOP? Really?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Last Night's debate was a bad episode of Democrap Party Fantasy Island!

      Unicorns, lollipops, rainbows and endless streams of money, goodies and handouts from the government. all FREEEEE!

      Free health care!

      Free college for even the most dimwitted among us, so we can fill the US with history majors, ethinic studies agitators and social science psychobabblers.

      Everything free! Why hasn't anyone else thought of that??!!

      Stupid people! Demoncraps are sooooo smart!

      Delete
    2. I can tell you have brown eyes, Dearie, without even looking at you.

      I'll give you three guesses as to how I could possibly know that?

      ............ Dora Dolores Drambuie

      Delete
    3. Well, aren't you the sly one, Dora!

      I think you may require a good deal of watching.

      At any rate, thanks for the chuckle. Off color remarks are only amusing when they're subtle.

      Delete
  8. free health care, free college, free marijuana, free Obsma phones. What a wonderful world.
    Where do I sign up?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Rheinhardt Angers RackleyOctober 14, 2015 at 11:19 AM

      No kidding. The DumboCrap party agenda would be great... if the government had an endless supply of money.

      The Demon Crap plan would be wonderful... if we could all sit home, collect our government check and smoke dope all day without the economy collapsing.

      The stupidity of the average DemonCrap politician is surpassed only by the average DumboCrap voter!

      Delete
    2. But, Reinhardt, the government DOES have an endless supply of money. All they have to do is keep printing more whenever they need it. Don't you realize that?

      The problem won't be the availability of money once everyone is on the dole. The problem will be that no one will be able to buy anything with it, because all productivity and creative innovation will have ceased.

      ......... Dora Dolores Drambuie

      Delete
    3. Dora! I'm beginning to suspect you may be a treasure. Your comment here is as remarkably astute as your one was amusing.

      Please come back and stick around a little loinger.

      Delete
  9. Adelheid Einhorn-TeufelOctober 14, 2015 at 11:16 AM

    Hillary is clearly the people's choice. Last night we saw a serious debate, unlike the clown show the GOP field has become.

    Who will the GOP put forth? The Human Blowtorch? Another Shrub?

    Get used to hearing President Hillary Clinton, you backwards, old, white, mansplainers. It is past time we had something other than a set of balls in the White House.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hillary is a woman gosh darnit! It takes her longer to pee than men

      Delete
    2. Apparently, Adelheid, the One-Horned Devil, you never knew about Mrs. Harding and Mrs. Wilson, did you? Go look them up. You'll be astonished. Mrs. Roosevelt too was a VERY large part of the Franklin Delano Roosevelt presidency. I've often though it FDR's three terms in office should be referred to as the Franklin d'Eleanor Roosevelt administration.

      Abigail Adams had a great deal to do with her husband John's astonishingly successful career, and Martha Washington was no slouch either, She kept the home fires burning, the crops properly tended, and the accounts paid at Mt. Vernon for YEARS while her husband George was away risking life and limb for the prize of Independence.

      Those were TRULY strong women who met challenges that would cause today's grotesque caricatures of femininity to quail, and crumple into sobbing, gibbering idiots.

      Delete
  10. The Provayer of TruthOctober 14, 2015 at 11:26 AM

    I think that HillRt Clinton did exactly what she had to do, remain composed and come across as a warmer individual and the real honest candidate that she is.

    Actually, at least for me, there were few if any surprises. All candidates pretty much responded to questions as expected and the questions were issues democrats have been focused on fore some time. However Hillary clearly came out on top.

    Clinton, regardless of anyone's own view of her sincerity and honesty or lack thereof, came across as knowledgeable, in control of facts,
    and capable of doing the job better than any of the republican clowns that we have been seeming on our TV screens.
    I call it a tie for the number one spot between Clinton and Sanders, mostly because Bernie was refreshingly honest and Clinton still has a bit of convincing to some.
    As for me. I'm already convinced , Hillary is my clear choice,

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. P-U-R-V-E-Y-O-R of Truth, are you genuinely illiterate, or do you just AFFECT illiteracy for some bizarre motivation I can't fathom? What could possibly be gained by spreading more ignorance and inaccuracy among an infantilized, "ignoranticized," woefully-dense population?

      Delete
  11. I thought Sanders did very well last night as did Clinton. I'm happy with either of them in the White House and I'll keep donating to both.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Some people deserve a dictator

      Delete
    2. And what will you do with the rest of your Welfare Check?

      Delete
    3. With replies like those, it's small wonder normal people mock Republicans.

      Delete
    4. ... said the dummy giving his money to lying, liberty-quashing politicians...

      Delete
  12. And when given the choice of "Black lives Matter" or "All lives Matter" all but one picKed "BLACK LIVES MATTER".. ARE THEY KIDDING! And WHY did they pick a question like that in the first place?

    'Black lives matter': Why we need that slogan at all?

    The participants must have worried about losing the Black vote!

    And If black lives matter so much, then why are blacks killing each other????

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm jes saying, Ben Carson has got them WORRIED!

      Delete
    2. In THEIR so-called minds Dr. Carson is to the presidency what Clarence Thomas is to the Supreme Court and Condoleezza Rice was to the State Department.

      A Negro ceases to be a Negro and becomes an Enemy of The Agenda once he becomes enlightened, cuts off his shackles and frees himself from servitude to his Marxian Overseers.

      Simple as that.

      Delete
    3. You haven't lived in Maryland and seen the DNC doublecross African-American voters.

      They'll vote for Ben Carson 2-1 over Hillary, and 3-1 over Bernie. The DNC is toast if Ben Carson becoms the nominee.

      Delete
    4. I certainly hope you are right, FJ., but the passionately pathetic ignorance of a preponderance of the so-called Black Community may never be overcome by Truth and Reason. For every Dr. Carson there at least a million Rodney Kings and Freddie Grays.

      AND there is the abysmal stupidity of the politically tone-deaf RINO Establishment. Even FOX News has come out in full support of the RINO'S. The rest of us –– a small-but-highly-vocal minority, who don't want to go along with the program, –– are labelled as "Fringe Right Lunatics."

      With the ENEMEDIA –– of which FOX has clearly been revealed as a member __, staging a Full Court Press against us every day from now until the 2016 is over, what chance have we to prevail.

      The apparent faith in Dr. Carson of a surprisingly significant percentage of those polled is about the ONLY thing that gives me hope that we may yet have a chance to claim a better future.

      Delete
  13. If the Republican field is the Clown Car the dems are the Short Yellow Bus.

    Someone please tell Bernie Sanders there just aren't enough billionaires to pay for all his freebies.

    Someone please tell O'Malley he left the city of Baltimore a war zone and he was a failure.

    Someone please tell Hillary we know she is a woman, she doesn't have to continue saying it.

    Someone tell Chaffee the mother ship will be landing to take him back to the planet Mongo.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "Someone please tell Bernie Sanders there just aren't enough billionaires to pay for all his freebies."

      That's Four-Star, Blue-Ribbon, Class-A observation, Rusty

      It SHOULD be an obvious point, but those deluded by the blandishments of the Left quickly ever semblance they may have had of good, plain, old-fashioned Horse Sense.

      In other words they exchange Horse Sense for Horse Shit. };-)>

      Delete
  14. Please wake up those Zombies from the dead

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. WHY? Too many of the dead vote exclusively for DEMOCRATS.

      Delete
  15. What weve seen at the debate (last night) ws the worse of the worst that America has to offer.
    The Democrats should be ashamed of themselves to put a bunch of old losers on display as they did.
    And anyone who would waste a vote on any of them would have to have rocks in their heads.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh, what a smart man you must be! And tell me, incredibly intelligent commentator, what winner do you have in mind?

      JMJ

      Delete
  16. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  17. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  18. That Hitlary's some gal! She has EXPReRIENCE!

    ReplyDelete
  19. A Radical Pigs LiverOctober 14, 2015 at 3:19 PM

    I wonder if the TBaggers have stopped hitting themselves over their heads with hammers yet? That's what they decided to do because for them it felt better than thinking of President Hillary Clinton.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Tuesday night’s political debate was intended as an opportunity for one of the Democrat Party presidential hopefuls to separate him or herself from the rest of the pack, the best line of the night came from a man who was not even in the room with the debaters nor in the same party.

    In effect, Republican presidential hopeful Donald Trump stole the show with a perfectly-timed tweet explaining that Hillary Clinton, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT)16%
    , Martin O’Malley, Jim Webb, and Lincoln Chafee spent their night talking about the all the free stuff they were going to give away–including ObamaCare benefits and tuition breaks for illegal immigrants–without once mentioning what they would do to make conditions better for U.S. military veterans.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, indeed, but I believe former Republican-turned-D'Rat, Jim Webb, distinguished himself from the others. He was obviously not a welcome member of that company. Anderson cooper did his best to keep Webb out of the discussion as much as possible. Of course, even though he is a clean, manly man with an honorable record of service, I could never trust him, because of the perverse impulse that caused him to leave the GOP and join the D'Rats. To me that is a sign of mental illness.

      Delete
    2. stomp, snort, and gruntOctober 14, 2015 at 7:32 PM

      Presumably it is acceptable to leave the GOP and become an independent thinking and acting individual rather than a choir member of a party partially controlled by oligarchs.

      Delete
    3. Should be, Stomp, but let's face it: The Oligarchs don't like it.

      Since "The Oligarchs" = "The Donor Class," they're pretty hard to beat –– but not impossible, –– as the elections of Ronald Reagan, Ted Cruz, and Marco Rubio prove. Those and also the firm kick in the butt that supposedly promising fellow Eric Cantor got from his western Virginia constituents by an "unknown nobody with "no money" gives us cause for hope.

      Delete
  21. I don't think Joe Biden will jump in after Hillary's strong performance last night.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think you may very well be correct. D'Rats stick together much more than Pubbies. I believe we may rest assured that Joe Biden's "Reluctant Debutante Act" has been craftily calculated to do whatever it could to advance the Marxicrat Cause. The Long Slow March to transform the once-free United States into the United Socialist Atheist States of Amerika (USASA - pronounced Ooh-SAH-suh) is ALL that ANY of the Marxicrats REALLY care about.

      Theirs is a POWER AGENDA pure and simple. They want to DICTATE the future course of your life by monitoring and supervising every move you make and every breath you take.

      If H. Rodham Clinton's well-rehearsed act, subtly enhanced by her supposed rivals, had fallen on its face, I'm fairly certain we would have heard Biden announce his candidacy before noon today.

      Delete
  22. Sounds like I must have missed something as they all seemed to be going off the rails trying to decide what country in what remote part of the globe should be slated next annihilation and destruction raining down on them from above.Step up the action in Syria or the Ukraine or head off for the remote areas of the China Sea.

    The more thing change the more things stay the same.

    Anyway, obviously it's the American people who are the real winners here with this slate of bat shit crazy moon bats.

    Are they all neo-cons in disguise, or what?

    ReplyDelete
  23. Democratic Party Debate Sets New Record...it was reported that over 25 people watched it

    ReplyDelete
  24. Joy Behar said

    That Bernie Sanders is so hot I wet my pants just looking at him. Go, Bernie!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sounds like somebody could use some "Depends"...

      Delete
    2. A vigorous "de-programming" regimen might prove more useful to poor Joy, FJ.

      There's no groupie like an OLD groupie, I fear. };-)>

      Delete
  25. Ignoring Ignoramuses said

    HEY, FT, THANKS for this great LINK to NAT’L REVIEW:

    PART ONE

    The Debate Lesson: America Now Has an Openly Socialist Party

    by JIM GERAGHTY

    October 13, 2015 11:05 PM

    Sure, this batch of candidates sounded like a bunch of loons. They contended socialism is mostly about standing up to the richest one percent and promoting entrepreneurs and small business; climate change is the biggest national security threat facing the nation; college educations should be free for everyone; all lives don’t matter, black lives do; Obama is simultaneously an enormously successful president in managing the economy and the middle class is collapsing and there’s a need for a “New New Deal” which is in fact an Old Old Idea, considering how FDR called for a Second New Deal in 1935.

    The audience in Nevada applauded higher taxes, believes that Hillary Clinton doesn’t need to answer any more questions, supports the complete shutdown of the NSA domestic surveillance program, and that Obamacare benefits should be extended to illegal immigrants. There are kindergarten classes with more realistic assessments of cost-benefit tradeoffs than the crowd watching this debate at the Wynn Las Vegas.

    So yes, the candidates sounded like hard-Left, pie-in-the-sky, free-ice-cream-for-everyone, Socialist pander bears. But they do so because that is what the Democratic Party’s primary voters demand.

    Don’t blame them; blame the party rank-and-file that craves these promises, rhetoric, and worldview. With that in mind, Hillary Clinton is the class of the field on that stage, and the only real obstacle to the nomination that remains is a Joe Biden bid.

    Compared with everyone else, she’s polished and knows what she’s doing. Even when she’s being robotic and inauthentic, she’s remembering her talking points, pivoting to her preferred issues. The software upgrades to her personality may look awkward when she’s alone, but she’s still a much, much better candidate than anybody else on that stage.

    Sure, she was duplicitous, but she’s a Clinton; that’s baked in the cake — for example Hillary said during the debate she had hoped that the Trans Pacific Partnership would be the gold standard; in her book, she said it was the gold standard.

    Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/425531/debate-lesson-america-now-has-openly-socialist-party-jim-geraghty


    ReplyDelete
  26. Ignoring Ignoramuses said

    PART TWO of Jim Geraghty's article in Nat'l Review (edited)

    In one of the few surprises of the night, Bernie Sanders did his best to try to save her on her troubles with her personal e-mail server. He’s an old fool if he thinks Hillary will return the favor when he needs it.

    Martin O’Malley, who sounded tough in cable-news interviews, wimped out in the end once he saw the audience’s roaring applause to Sanders’s declaration that the issue was settled and nobody needed to hear any more about “her damn e-mails.”

    Sanders may rock the arenas when they’re filled with progressive grassroots activists, but his style doesn’t transfer well to a broader audience. He’s the party guest whom you instinctively don’t want to talk to, who begins shouting immediately, who grabs your lapel and spits a bit as he jabs his finger into your chest for emphasis. He’s Senator Larry David. You want to get away from his perpetually irritated (and irritating) ranting, but he just won’t stop talking, and he won’t let you gently back away or escape the conversation.

    Every two-minute answer from Sanders felt like ten minutes of shouting — and he had the audacity to give Hillary grief about shouting.

    Beyond his giant wimp-out on Hillary’s e-mails, O’Malley was more pleasant to listen to, but is ultimately going to be a non-factor in this race. When Sanders finished his call for a revolution, O’Malley turned to the camera and said with a big smile, “What we need is a green-energy revolution!” And for a moment, he waited for applause that didn’t come.

    The Democratic audience wasn’t in a mood for innovation. They are in a mood for populist revenge against people who have more than they do. Sanders shouts, O’Malley whispers. ...

    Jim Webb pointed out how affirmative action disadvantages poor whites, the need to respect the rights of gun owners, the seriousness of foreign-policy threats that Democrats rarely acknowledge — like cyber threats, hacking (ahem), and China. He was the lone voice of reality saying,“With all due respect to Senator Sanders, I don’t think the revolution is going to come, and I don’t think the Congress is going to pay for all this.”

    Webb would have had a good chance of winning the Democratic nomination in 1948. You almost have to wonder how Webb would be doing in the GOP presidential primary, but at a key moment, Webb flinched, saying he wouldn’t have a problem with extending Obamacare benefits to illegal immigrants.

    But give him style points for his declaration that his biggest enemy was the man who tried to kill him with a grenade . . . a man who’s not around any more.

    It seemed as if Webb complained he wasn’t getting enough time or enough questions every single time he was called on by Anderson Cooper.

    Lincoln Chafee was there, and he thought Cooper was hard on him when he asked about one of the first votes he took in he Senate. 

    Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/425531/debate-lesson-america-now-has-openly-socialist-party-jim-geraghty

    ReplyDelete
  27. Thank you, II, for posting so much of that very good article. Let's hope someone will read it and make intelligent comments about it.

    Hope springs eternal!

    ReplyDelete
  28. Intelligent comments?

    (sigh)

    It seems to me this article was a projection of what the GOP is going through now, in the grasp of a radical right wing. Bandying about the word "socialist" and whistling to angry old white dogs does not make an intelligent point about anything. It was written to deflect from the woes of the right.

    JMJ

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jersey,

      I watched the entire debate, and I think Geraghty's piece is an excellent report on the significant parts of the event.

      It really is amazing, Jersey, how two different people can look at the exact same thing and each see something entirely different. That's why we accuse each other of living in "parallel universes," I guess. ;-)

      Of course, each person is trapped in the prison of his own perceptions formed by early childhood experiences, the cultural and socio-economic mores of his environment, etc. So, naturally there will be differing views of Reality. In that regard i am no different from you and vice versa.

      THE major problem virtually all human beings seem to have is a persistent belief that what happens to be "normal" for THEM ought to be "normal" for EVERYBODY, and that is just not the case.

      One thing almost everyone has in common is a fierce dislike of being DOMINATED –– even when it's honestly intended for "their own good." With many disparate factions vying constantly to try to DOMINATE and "REFORM" the culture to their particular liking is it any wonder why we're all deeply distrustful and always snarling at each other?

      Delete
    2. No, FT, it was obvious. The Democratic party is not in the grasp of some polar insurgency, their are no ridiculous promises, they are not caught in their own corner. ALL of that the GOP is experiencing now. Wake up old fella!

      JMJ

      Delete
  29. And we must admit SHE LOOKED ATTRACTIVE.

    Yes, she did. Plenty of fashion advisers who know how to present their clients.

    This debate was effective stagecraft on several different levels.

    At the heart of the debate was this, however: the Democratic Party should be renamed honestly -- that is, the Democratic Socialist Party.

    Hillary did openly admit "I am a Progressive."

    Has even Obama openly stated that about himself? If he had done so in 2008, could he have been elected?

    My father-in-law is a quite a distance Left of center. However, about 10 years ago, when I asked him, "Are you a Progressive?" he bristled and objected.

    "A Progressive? Don't call me that! A Progressive is a Communist, and I am not a Communist!"

    Yet, now, on the debate stage the other night, we watched the candidates debate the merits of capitalism instead of siding with capitalism.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hiring the services of a competent fashion consultant was LONG overdue in Hillary's case, AOW. She's been a Sty in the Public Eye for 25 years, and I've always thought her apparent lack of concern about her appearance was a sign of profound disrespect to all of us –– friends and foes alike.

      IF we're going to have to endure her as Madame President for the rest of my natural days, God forbid [I'll be EIGHTY in 2021], her improved image might help make it a wee bit less painful. So, long may it wave! We just can't have a SLATTERN in the Oval Office, unless she's a CHARWOMAN working in the wee hours when everyone of consequence in public life is fast asleep. ;-)

      As for your father-in-law and all that, I too have frequently been criticized with howls of protest and sneers of contempt for "name-calling," and "labelling" if ever I refer to so-and-so as a Liberal, a Progressive, a Socialist, a Communist, a Leftist, an Authoritarian, a Laborite, a Theocrat, etc. Dear friends of longstanding get terribly upset when I even HINT at the TRUTH of their political positions.

      And then our persistently petulant adversaries on the Left want always to divert attention from the meat of an issue by giving tediously pious lectures on how "ignorant" and "ill-informed" I am, because I don't "really" know what "Socialism" is, etc. etc. etc.

      To paraphrase Gertrude Stein: A turd is a turd is a turd.

      Shakespeare, of course, said it much better, so I'll paraphrase him too:

      A turd by any other name would still stink out loud. };-)>

      Delete
    2. Slattern?

      I've always thought of the Hellahag as a frowsy frump...

      Delete
  30. After the debate, I decided that, based on what I had managed to watch (Rolling up and storing the garden hose had to be done, so I missed some of the debate), Bernie Sanders won this debate.

    Hillary didn't do herself any harm.

    Except for one answer she gave.

    When asked how her administration would differ from Obama's, she declared, "I'm a woman!" Why didn't she just scream and cheer! "I HAVE A VAGINA, AND THAT QUALIFIES ME TO BE YOUR NEXT PRESIDENT!"

    My first prediction: Biden will not jump in.

    My second prediction: The Democrats will lose in 2016 -- but just barely AND ONLY IF JEB BUSH IS NOT THE GOP CANDIDATE. Jeb's planned coronation ain't goin' so well.

    America has moved way to the Left, but not so far Left as to guarantee a Democratic Socialist win in 2016.

    My third prediction: the Democratic Socialist Party will win in 2020. But then, America, if still standing, will have shifted to the Far Left.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I disagree, even though "all" the polls claim a victory for Sanders. Sanders came off as a JOHNNY-ONE-NOTE –– A REDUNDANT LOUDMOUTH –– an OBNOXIOUS, OBVIOUSLY JEWISH, RED DIAPER BABY from BROOKLYN. His ACCENT is frankly APPALLING, and his ideas are as stale, potentially destructive, and idiotic as those of our longtime gadfly DUCKY.

      Sanders' BACKGROUND is every bit as vile as OBAMA'S.

      It distresses me greatly that our country has become so woefully ignorant and morally degenerate that we would even CONSIDER such a person as a presidential candidate.

      Doesn't anyone wonder why, –– since so much has been made of OBAMA's being The First BLACK President, and Hillary trumpets the potential wonder and glory of her being The First WOMAN President ––, Bernie Sanders is not shouting to the housetops all over the land that if elected, he would be The First JEWISH President?

      I'm sure to get hell for daring to say this, but I am LONG past caring. No longer caring what others may think of you is one of the very few good things about getting old. ;-)

      Delete
    2. FT,
      Sanders came off as a JOHNNY-ONE-NOTE –– A REDUNDANT LOUDMOUTH...

      But not as scripted.

      Sanders is what he is. Hillary can be a chameleon and turn on and off the sweetness faucet.

      On cue!

      Hillary came across as scripted -- to me, at least.

      Delete
    3. BTW, I did see something about Sanders as the first Jewish POTUS, but can't recall the location or the gist of the article.

      Delete
  31. Oh, and one more thing....

    In looking at those on the stage during the debate, I conclude that the Democratic Socialist Party is the Party of Senior Citizens.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bernie Sanders looks like a holdover from Woodstock.

      Delete
    2. Senator Sanders has no need to "open up" about it, AOW. It's as obvious as the the flopping blond fringe that covers Donald Trump's ill-barbered head.

      Delete
    3. FT,
      Sanders, like so many Left wingers, is all about social justice.

      Nice catch phrase, but what is its origin? And the results of the fulfillment of social justice (as the term now means)?

      Delete
    4. "Social Justice" may sound like a worthy objective, but the term has ALWAYS been a Code Word for COMMUNISM.

      Delete
    5. Interesting article that AOW linked with.

      From the article:

      "A recent profile of Sanders in the Tablet, a Jewish digital publication, described how Sanders’s father, Eli, emigrated in 1921 from a rural village in the south of Poland, where all Jewish businesses were closed down and Jews’ goods confiscated. “Most of Eli’s family was sent to concentration camps where they were killed,” the Tablet reported.

      It quoted Sanders’s older brother, Larry, as saying that for the two of them, “the two political figures who held the greatest influence were Adolf Hitler and Franklin Roosevelt. ‘Politics could go desperately wrong,’ Larry said, ‘but it could also have a positive impact.'”

      EGAD. Imagine a President who would be a cross between Adolph Hitler and Franklin Delano Roosevelt. The world is getting crazier by the minute.

      And here I thought "The Bern" was just another kindly Uncle Fluffy.

      Delete
  32. Replies
    1. Money quote from the above:

      The CNN debate was like Jeb Bush swooping in and dominating a debate against Jim Gilmore, George Pataki and Lindsey Graham, and everyone concluding he’s a marvelous performer and it’s time for the bed-wetters to stop worrying about his candidacy.

      Delete
  33. My "Dear" Mr. Thinke, I have been reading the slop that yo and your illiterate readers, and commenters have been posting since the Democratic debate, and frankly it was just as expected. Why would I or anyone else with a brain in their heads expect anything from you people that made any sense?
    You seem to be stuck on stupid as you usually are when it comes to politics . My advise to you would be to stick to poetry, the arts, or theater. The state of the country seems to be way over your head and you just can't seem to comprehend its importance.
    You have a nerve to come out and denigrate the Democratic Party's debate, when your own party put up a bandstand of circus clowns, fools, and dimwits! You need to look at the nincompoops your party is supporting as possible leaders of the U.S. The rest of the country and the world laughs at them, but you and the people in the TGOP living in a bubble don't get it at all.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Insults do NOT constitute intelligent debate. If that's all you have in support of your views, your position must be extremely weak.

      You have a right to your opinion, of course. We all do. Where I find fault is not in our disagreement, but in your obvious belief that your side has the right to be as rude, aggressively scornful, insolent and churlish as you like while holding your (perfectly legitimate) opposition to a much higher standard.

      Double standards are as absurd as they are odious.

      I don't make a practice of heaping scorn on liberal blogs and telling them how outraged and bent out of shape I am that they have the colossal gall to dislike conservative opinions, so why should any of "us" allow people of your temperament and political persuasion to gallop into our town and shoot up the saloon, as it were? ;-)

      Also, while I may at times agree that too many on "our' side post carelessly written, semi-literate, downright silly examples of childish ill humor, I believe they have a right to express themselves too –– as long as they stay ON TOPIC.

      I happen to know for a fact that you are not who you are pretending to be, and that puts YOU squarely in the category of a trollish MISCHIEF-MAKER.

      Whoever you are, you have no right either to censure –– or attempt to censor –– ME. Our aim here is talk about ISSUES and PRINCIPLES of GOVERNANCE –– not EACH OTHER.

      Now, kindly run along ,and go peddle your ill will elsewhere.

      Delete
  34. Stranger things have happenedOctober 15, 2015 at 8:09 AM

    This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  35. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  36. The Liberal’s or Progressives or whatever these Lying Sacks are calling themselves these days, conveniently leave out the word “illegal” when talking about those who came to this country illegally, in violation of our laws.

    Those are the “Immigrants” that Trump wants to get rid of…The “ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS”. So tell me all you Smart Ass Douchbags, what in the world is wrong with that?
    No matter what you may think of Donald Trump, good or bad, it’s had to ignore this.
    I’m so sick of these jerks who constantly cry about breaking up the families, who come here and have these “ANCHOR BABIES” and expect to stay here because of that! . Most of these people are nothing but low life scum anyway, so who the heck needs these Vultures who suck the blood out of the Tax paying Americans!!!

    The parents who are here illegally to stay and the get free education with FREE English classes, FREE school breakfast and lunch, FREE medical or medicaid, FREE or close to fee public housing, Food-Stamps, and get tax breaks even if they are not living in this country all at the expense of the American tax pays because illegal aliens pay very little id anything at all in taxes and if they do, they get tax breaks. Most ANCHOR BABIES are Hispanic because it is easy for their mothers to get across the border. Plus they are bankrupting American hospital emergency rooms.
    Now just in case you didn’t know it, I did the math for you... So Chew on this! 400,000 anchor babies born in this country each year.
    Medicaid alone paid $2.2 billion last year to partially reimburse hospitals for unpaid illegal alien delivery bills,
    A staggering 84 hospitals in California alone, have been forced to close their doors because of unpaid bills by illegal aliens. Hospitals which manage to remain open, pass the unpaid costs onto the rest of us,
    which translates into more out-of-pocket expenses and higher insurance premiums for Americans.
    In fact at one hospital in Dallas…Parkland Memorial Hospital (yes, the same hospital where JFK died after his assassination in 1963), a staggering 70% of all babies born are to illegal aliens.
    ‘Anchor Baby’ Outrage: How Americans Pay BILLIONS for Illegal Alien Births. And then they get, FREE medical care, FREE food stamps, WIC, FREE education. shelter, etc and the tax payers foot the bill. What do YOU ger FREE?

    Finished Chewing yet?
    I am so fed up with this Bull Shit I am thinking of not paying my next quarterly estimated tax, just basically telling obama and the feds to go fucking die somewhere, and take the illegal hordes with them.
    This is criminal what these whore bastard politicians have been doing, and the anger it is inducing in both me and many fellow Americans is reaching a boiling point. If this is not stopped, and all illegal’s deported, with a wall built, termination of the 14th amendment mis-reading/elimination of anchor baby nonsense, massive fines/jail time for employers, and a total and complete end to all benefits for illegal’s, I will hope and possibly help instigate a civil war in this country, starting with "no taxes paid" days, where people refuse to pay any sales tax, and refuse to write estimated taxes or property tax checks, and pay their bills such as cell phones by subtracting all taxes off the bill, paying only the service charge! Now you can Finnish Chewing !

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anita, has no one ever told you that "Brevity is the soul of wit?"

      Please take this kindly-meant advice from an old editor:

      Try to break up your comments into small, readable segments. Be sure to SPACE between your paragraphs.

      You do have good points to make, but if you really want people to read your screed, the presentation leaves much to be desired.

      Delete
  37. Once again we hear Hillary shifting her story to cover her s$$. If Hillary really was focused on doing her job and not paying attention to which email she used it would have been far easier to simply use the State Department email system which was already set up to handle classified i

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. At this point the less said about the emails the better. Haven't you caught onto the Leftist-Oligarchical tactic of SATURATING the Public Consciousness with something like this to the point where the people get so SICK and TIRED of HEARING ABOUT IT, they let the perpetrators GET AWAY with their misdeeds?

      It's a technique the enemedia uses to control the agenda.

      Delete
    2. FT,
      At this point the less said about the emails the better.

      Bingo!

      Hasn't there been another defector from one of the Congressional investigation committees?

      And who is priming these defections? Hillary's camp? Karl Rove's camp?

      Delete
    3. Defector? Perhaps the right wing should stop acting like we're in a 1950's spy movie and start acting like responsible adults. The only 'defectors' are those waging partisan inquiries with tax dollars. You can't get more anti-American than that.

      Delete
    4. Oh, I see! What you would call "partisan witch hunts" are only bad when REPUBLICANS are doing the investigating. Democrats are sinless, stainless, spotless, selfless, Simon-pure, saint-like creatures whose motives are as pure as their unblemished souls, and whose every action is motivated only by the most charitable of impulses, and is, therefore, above reproach.

      Of COURSE! That's IT! WHY didn't I see it for myself?

      Delete
  38. Clearly the stupid aka Progressives are out for Ben Carson. As he climbs in the polls, hot on the heels of frontrunner Donald Trump – and is de rigueur for political campaigning – there are those who will attempt to find any bit of mud to sling.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. YUP! And if they can't find anything wrong with Dr. Carson, they'll MAKE SOMETHING UP out of whole cloth, and then brazenly accuse "us" of "lying," when we expose THEIR lies.

      Rotten game, ain't it?

      Delete
    2. FT,
      Rotten game, ain't it?

      Just the other day, I found out even more about how rotten the game is! Not something that I can share in a public forum, though.

      Delete
    3. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      Delete
  39. Personally. I always thoughtthat the Clintons (all of them) from Bill to Chelsea are trash. But hey, that's just me.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Both Ivy League. He a Rhodes Scholar. Both lawyers, though he was disbarred. Both amoral, masters of deceit, possessed of feral cunning. Not "trash," but neither is anyone I'd want to know on a personal level either.

      And no. I would NOT feel comfortable buying a used car from either of them.

      Delete
  40. Lets hope that Ben Carson will start filling the town hall meetings in all the swing states, and bringing in massive black crowds! Just like Trump Is Doing...
    Wouldn't it be interesting to see how Hillary, Onama and all of the braindead leftist's react to that.

    They'd probably accuse himn of being an Uncle Tom.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The DNC, in its quest for an all-white primary, is about to lose a whole voting block. :)

      Delete
  41. Anf lets not forget that all the Democratic candidates were white? The GOP debate had not just a woman, but two Hispanics a black man and an Indian. The GOP is the real party of diversity when it counts.
    So how do you like them apples!

    ReplyDelete
  42. Listen, I know quite a few people on the left aren’t huge Hillary Clinton supporters. I personally like her, but I understand that a lot of people don’t. Even as a supporter, I know she’s far from perfect – but there’s a harsh reality that Hillary haters on the left need to face. Listen, I love Bernie Sanders, but it’s highly unlikely that he could win a general election and become president. He’ll be 75 in 2016, meaning that if he served eight years he’d be 83-years-old. Even if you get past his age, which many wouldn’t, he’s also a self-described socialist. If you really think this country is going to elect a self-described socialist to the White House, you really should take a look at the Gallup poll that shows even 41 percent of Democrats won’t support a socialist. That’s significant, whether or not many Sanders supporters want to admit it. Furthermore, Sanders is really best suited for the Senate. It’s where he can do the most good. Outside of those two, it’s almost too late in the game for someone like Joe Biden to sneak in and stand a chance. Especially after the first Democratic debate where both Clinton and Sanders performed well

    I think MOST democrats will plug their nose and vote for Hillary in the general election. However, I have no intent on voting for her in the primary. You're right, there isn't much selection - who's fault is that though? Surely our own as we delusionally think the runner up of the 2008 primary is our BEST shot in 2016...we're doomed folks, let that sink in. If we couldn't manage to elevate someone better in the 8 years since Clinton lost the primary, we've got no real shot in 2016 unless the republicans suck worse and put up a tea bagger and even then I don't think we're going to win. History has shown that the pendululm will swing back to the conservatives - either because that's the ebb and flow, or because our elections are far more rigged than we'll ever know. Last note - I haven't forgotten her blatant pandering to the racist segment of the democratic party in a last ditch effort to beat Obama in the primaries...honestly, that was the moment she lost every ounce of my respect and will never get it back again.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You got no worries. Sanders is the fall guy. He draws the hard lefties into the primary process while allowing Hillary to appear moderate to general election voters. Meanwhile, most of those lefties will feel vested in the process and vote for Hillary in the general.

      The fix is is in.

      Delete
    2. The African American vote is going to Ben Carson. Democrats can't win without them. Hillary is toast.

      Delete
  43. Look around, we've crap and turds in our party to pick from...I’d hardly say that the fact that we've got no better option than Hillary proves most of us want her. Besides, historically it should be the VP set up to run afterwards...and we're all begging Joe Biden not to because he sucks. Come on...we're delusional if we can't see the craptastic hand we're about to play out. Mark my words, no matter who we put up there...republicans are taking 2016. The DNC handed it to Obama - along with Wall Street and you can bet they'll hand the next one to a conservative. History proves I'm going to be right...we aren't participating in a democracy, hate to burst your bubble.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Never underestimate the Clinton Crime Syndicate. You cross 'em, you're under their wheels or dead somewhere.

      It will be a close general election that could go either way, depending on who the GOP nominates.

      Delete
  44. Interesting that study shows African-Americans tend to vote for the Party, not the color of the candidate's skin. So Carson will not attract hordes of African-American voters, as the tGOP hopes:
    Hello President Hillary!

    ReplyDelete
  45. President Hillary Rodham Clinton (and First "Gentleman" William Jefferson Clinton.

    Can Americans be any stupider?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, and the beat goes on. These idiotic Progressives will never learn, they love being screwed.

      Delete
  46. " LSDeclassified: Psychedelics and the CIA

    CIA operatives dosed hundreds of unwitting U.S. citizens with LSD in order to observe its effects. Mental patients, the homeless, drug addicts, prostitutes, and prisoners—“people who could not fight back,” as one agency officer described them—were all subjected to forced LSD ingestion as part of the CIA’s research. The agency conducted 149 separate experiments into mind control and other applications of hallucinogenic drugs, all of which were ultimately useless, according to Sidney Gottlieb, the man responsible for overseeing that part of the MK-ULTRA program, shortly before he retired from the agency in 1972.

    The program yielded no scientific benefit, and left many subjects’ lives in ruin. At least one test subject died, and many others were left with serious psychological problems or went insane. Despite the damage the CIA had done, Gottlieb was awarded the Distinguished Intelligence Medal in 1973, the same year the agency deliberately destroyed much of the evidence pertaining to the MK-ULTRA program.

    “Gottlieb never did what he did for inhumane reasons,” says John Gittinger, a psychologist at the CIA who vetted Gottlieb prior to his appointment as supervisor of the program. “He thought he was doing exactly what was needed. And in the context of the time, who would argue? But with his experiments on unwitting subjects, he clearly violated the Nuremburg standards—the standards under which, after World War II, we executed Nazi doctors for crimes against humanity.

    ReplyDelete
  47. Walter Cronkite: " And that's the way it is ..."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Walter KRANKHEIT is much more like it, Waylon. ;-)

      Krankheit is German for sickness, illness, disease, etc. I looked him up, and sure enough his grandfather's true name was KRANKHEYT. The family was Dutch on his father's side. Dutch and German belong to the same family of languages, and if you can read one, it's not difficult to decipher the other.

      I was one of the many millions of Americans who had no idea during the 1950's that our beloved "Uncle Walter" was in fact a MARXIST in DISGUISE.

      NOT one of The Chosen, however, but HIRED by several of them, of course.

      Do you remember reading the story of Herb Philbrick, author of I Led Three Lives? It became a popular TV series back in the fifties, and did much to warn us against the evils of Communist Infiltration of key elements in our society.

      That was before Cultural Marxism swallowed us whole, chewed us up and spat us out leaving the depressing mess we must live with today.

      I have heard many of the stories you cite about the CIA before. I have come to believe that the CIA has long been a tool of The Oligarchs and has had little to do with protecting AMERICAN interests and promoting AMERICAN values for a very long time.

      The STATE Department too appears equally corrupt, disingenuous and determined NOT to support and enhance AMERICAN interests.

      In a few moments someone will come along to tell both of us it's time to don our TINFOIL HATS, of course.

      And that IS the way it is. DAMMIT!

      Delete
  48. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  49. Denver, that Just because you are standing in the garage that doesn't make you a car …. or sitting in the Oval Office didn't make you a President.

    ReplyDelete
  50. Facts are only Facts when they are TrueOctober 16, 2015 at 7:55 AM

    As you can see from reading this blog, Mr. Free Thinke does not deal in facts and does not contribute to a discussion. His idea of dialog on this og is to drop in and do his dirty drive-by snark, usually making factless (or as one of his filthy fellow posters call them) "Crap Sandwiches".
    Well, all I can say is Good Luck with that stupidity.

    ReplyDelete
  51. I I want to see Trump debate Hillary so bad I can taste it. I want to ser him vicious smack her down . And make her cry out . Please NO Mas.

    ReplyDelete
  52. I want a candidate who will deport our enemies to the Progressive mecca of their choice. A onetime expense to offload the slacker, low information underachievers, malcontents in exchange for peace and unprecedented prosperity at home

    ReplyDelete
  53. In Iran they hope that Hillary Clinton will be the next President

    ReplyDelete
  54. The leading presidential candidate in the Republican Party, Donald Trump, says you and your kind are not the best that Mexico is sending over the border, instead, you're criminals and rapists. The second presidential contender, kindly Dr. Ben, suggested that if he were president, he would bomb the caves where you and your family might be hiding.

    ReplyDelete
  55. You Democratics should really change ithr name of your party to the Democratic Socialist Party. The Party has shifted significantly to the Left since your "hero" Barack Osma Obama came into power.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies




    1. Iran never actually signed JCPOA deal; writes own version
      Written by Michele Hickford, Editor-in-Chief on October 15, 2015
      AP_Obama_presser_lt_130800_16x9_992
      Hold onto your hats folks. If this is correct, it seems the American people have been fed a wholesale lie by the Obama administration and everyone in the mainstream media, because apparently, the Iranian parliament NEVER voted to approve the Obama Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). And all the while Iran still holds four Americans hostage and released a video yesterday of an underground facility where long-range missiles are stored.

      Delete
    2. The Iranian parliament has rejected the formal, legal text of President Barack Obama’s nuclear deal, negotiated in July by the U.S., U.K., France, Germany, Russia, China and the Tehran regime.

      Delete
  56. Khamenei and Iran have promised a lot of things, including destroying Israel and America. Yesterday, as we reported, Iran threatened to attack America from the Gulf of Mexico, and even suggested there are suicide bombers ready to blow up U.S. ships.

    Obama has also promised many things – which have turned out to be lies. This may be the largest and most dangerous one yet. The only promise he seems to have followed through on is the “fundamental transformation” of this nation. The way we’re going, I pray to God it’s not the fundamental destruction.

    Americans must wake up! We are continually being fed absolute bovine excrement from this administration, from Iran to fabricated intel on our “success” against ISIS, and instead being told to focus on the weather as our biggest security threat.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Remember this when you vote. Think about a party that would put up a Hillary Clinton, a sick, aged corrupt liar who shows

      Delete
  57. With all due respect Mr. President, you created this illegal immigration mess - now you fix it! You invited them in, now you solve it We have these people Illegally entering the United States breaking laws , and that is not a right to citizenship. Don't tell us we're heartless because we believe in the rule of law .
    Just stop it, and stop it now!

    ReplyDelete
  58. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  59. Most people who voted for Barack Obama in 2008 did so at the urging of their stupid liberal friends and their ignorant family members. These are people who cannot understand simple economic graphs, and who get their business news from the Internet. Don't let your stupid friends screw us all again. Don't make that mistake again, Vote for Donald Trump in 2016. ‪#‎MakeAmericaGreatAgain‬

    ReplyDelete
  60. Was That a Democrat Debate or a Socialist Love Fest?
    What a perfect illustration of how corrupt and out of touch Democrat candidates are with mainstream America!

    ReplyDelete


  61. Liberals might not like hearing this, but it’s almost certainly NOT going to be Hillary Clinton 2016.

    I am throughly convinced that you don’t have to be too terribly intelligent to be a reporter for the liberal mainstream media, I realize the mainstream media does a lousy job of reporting when FACTS are in the equation, but for crying out loud, catastrophe in Benghazi Libya in was a blatant misrepresentation of facts and history.
    So here we are again with Hillary Rodham Clinton confronted by charges of obstruction of justice, perjury and general improbity. Such behavior has been going on with her for a long time,,
    We hear such lies for that Cover-Up, that it made the Bosnia Sniper Fire story look like a Child’s fairy Tale. And we are still listening to Hillary's Blatant Lies. Liar, Lies, and more Lies, followed by Implausible Deniability. I could go on, but you get my drift. There is a long record of blatant corruption up to the very present, and though the American taxpayer might not remember other markedly unsavory figures. And this is what these Progressives A-Holes want for their President! This is not a Clinton coronation! Enough is Enough!
    Maybe the mainstream media can write, at least to some degree, but has issues with math. Opinions can vary, but Facts do matter! And if Hillary is elected, it is our own damn fault, just like it was when Obama was re-elected.
    Winning is meaningless IF we elect a candidate that is a Progressive as obama the disaster who makes Putin look like a Boy Scout

    ReplyDelete
  62. I am so tired of this line of thought. Oh we have to settle for the least of the two evils. I am a Democratic and not a Socialist.
    Why are liberals constantly being lectured to like we're unable to make simple choices? .So.. who do you like better, Trump the Hump? Jeb Bush, Rand Paul, Scott Walker? You'd really prefer one of those guys appointing federal judges and I am so tired of this line of thought. Oh we have to settle for the least of the two evils. I am a Democratic ... Period, and nothing that you people say will change that.

    I remember Hillary speaking at one of the State of the Union Addresses as first lady, and still, to this day, it was and is the best political speech I've ever heard. I remember being stirred and thought back then that it would be great if SHE was president. I loved everything she said. I have no problem at all voting for her. I liked Bill Clinton as a President, and I think her experience with him and he along with her is an asset. I'm ready for Hillary.

    ReplyDelete
  63. ust look at us. Everything is backwards. Everything is upside down. Doctors destroy health, lawyers destroy justice, universities destroy knowledge, governments destroy freedom, the major media destroy information, and religion destroys spirituality. But this is the world of the Liberal, Progressives!

    Thus we have the Democratic “debate”.. That bunch of old fogies in that geriatric side-show , slapping each-other on their backs, kissing each others behinds! Did they really come there to debate or to push Hillary over the top and make excuses for her behavior, her lies, and cover-ups! And to say “enough of Hillary’s E-mails”! Was he kidding, and then to talk about ethics?
    This party of left-wing losers wasn’t a debate! It’s no wonder they are called “Leftards” ! Personally, I’d call them a lot worse.
    One Jackass saying “I’m against it, the other saying . I’m for it. and Hillary stood there with that stupid looking GRIN on her sour face!

    Bernie the Socialist wants to break up he banks. So does that Mummy O'Malley, and Hillary doesn't. And they called that issue more significant that the email scandals ?
    And did you see the way the brushed over Benghazi so fast! I guess that wasn’t “significant” enough either! But then again, what difference did it make (to that bunch)!
    No one wanted to nail Hillary’s ass to the post when it was so easy to.

    One moron, was for the Iran deal, two were is against it, the other one didn’t even know who Iran was! LOL He just wanted to break up the banks! After that he was lost.
    And the funny part is that after reading some of the Liberal blogs, all the losers are declaring a victory!
    The only adult there was Webb, which the analyst claimed should be a Republican. And that was most probably the only truth that was said the entire night. And the poor guy, kept saying, “how cone I’m getting as much time as the others” ... well DUH! Maybe because he made too much sense, or because he might have actually said something that was made sense ! Debate? There wasn’t anything there that would even pass for as a debate! Just a bunch of far-left progressive nut-jobs pander

    ReplyDelete

  64. TRUMP to Virginia:
    "Sanders is a Communist, and Clinton is a “joke, and a criminal'
    By Dmitri Voltova - October 16, 2015 0 146

    ReplyDelete
  65. Remember this when you vote. Think about a party that would put up a Hillary Clinton, a sick, aged corrupt liar who shows disdain for the Constitution, our military, and the rule of law.

    ReplyDelete

IF YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND THE FOLLOWING, YOU DON'T BELONG HERE, SO KINDLY GET OUT AND STAY OUT.

We welcome Conversation
But without Vituperation.
If your aim is Vilification ––
Other forms of Denigration ––
Unfounded Accusation --
Determined Obfuscation ––
Alienation with Self-Justification ––
We WILL use COMMENT ERADICATION.


IN ADDITION

Gratuitous Displays of Extraneous Knowledge Offered Not To Shed Light Or Enhance the Discussion, But For The Primary Purpose Of Giving An Impression Of Superiority are obnoxiously SELF-AGGRANDIZING, and therefore, Subject to Removal at the Discretion of the Censor-in-Residence.