She wouldn't even make a decent doormat, unless you wanted to scare potentialvisitors away.Yep!Now, let's see how many Dems stick by Hillary in this fray.
Dd you listen to Washington Journal this morning?Sadly revealing of the D'rat mentality. WE ARE DOOMED!!!
What did they say on Washington Journal?
Her ignorant, obnoxious, low-information supporters –– and, of course, the blacks and lots of loutish female ignoramuses with hick accents or whiskey tenors –– gave her unqualified support as they blamed the Republicans for everything from pregnancies out of wedlock to outbreaks of AIDS, infantile paralysis and bubonic plague in Turd World nations.C-Span, which used to be an interesting, often-valuable resource with intelligent callers has become as much of metaphorical dumping ground cum public toilet as the blogosphere.
Doormat? I always pictured her as one of those hideous gargoyles perched on either side of the main entryway of an old building.Even the NPR types are admitting that this latest 'attack' on Hillary did not originate from the right. As I said at Western Hero, the GOP is too weak and stupid to bring her down. Only the Dems in the party and the press can send her packing, and they just might. Right behind this is the charge that she was hitting up foreign donors for the Clinton Fund while she was traveling around as Secretary of State.
Her Heinous's press conference didn't play well with the New York Times
Delighted to hear it. Thanks for the link.
The valid criticisms of Hillary Clinton seem to have done nothing to stain her reputation as an honored member of CFR, where she commonly takes the podium to push forward her coming campaign for President.
Here creepy for FreeThinkee...Hilary age before human eyesWatch Hillary age 50 years
It's rather like The Picture of Dorian Gray, isn't it?Funny though, it struck me during that montage that IF Madame de Farce had been nicer person, instead of the insolent, scheming, mendacious viper consumed with monstrous ambition that, apparently, she's been all her life, she might have been attractive. Instead, he malevolent character has caused her to become increasingly repulsive over the decades.Beauty, as they say, is more than skin deep. CHARACTER determines our appearance far more as we age than any of the physical attributes we were given at birth.
Looked pretty good 1993, 1995. Time has not been kind to her.After the 47 idiots signed and mailed the Dear Tehran letter was hoping for a strong Clinton showing as repooplicans signed their own death sentence. But with the Hillary e-mail "scandal" guess it will be third party AGAIN.American politicians have no shame. The entire damned lot of them.
One of our biggest problems is that our few good ones, who strive manfully to challenge the admittedly rotten Washington Establishment get little or no support from self-appointed gadflies like you who dwell solely on negatives.In fact MOST of us deal almost entirely with negatives. Those few capable of creative thinking who have at least SOME of the answers to SOME of vital questions no one dares to ask for fear offending The Power Elite aka The Oligarchs, who hold the purse strings that fund BOTH corrupt parties -- and most the "wars" that flare up keeping everyone distracted from our REAL problems most of which are DOMESTIC, are jeered, mocked, scorned, vilified, hanged in effigy, and often wrongfully PROSECUTED on trumped up charges to shut their mouths.I could name names, but why should I bother? The masses are asses who blithely ACCEPT whatever viciously distorted CRAP gets handed to them by the ENEMEDIA.
Katie really nailed it. Thanks!
So did Hillary!
Sorry, Jersey, I deleted your comment by mistake.You told me, "Hillary Clinton is above you."If so, it must have taken a plane or crane to get her there.At any rate, if she's above me, that could be the reason I have to fight an irresistible urge to duck for cover every time her name is mentioned?
just hopin' she don't fall on ya!!!
IF YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND THE FOLLOWING, YOU DON'T BELONG HERE, SO KINDLY GET OUT AND STAY OUT.We welcome ConversationBut without Vituperation.If your aim is Vilification ––Other forms of Denigration ––Unfounded Accusation --Determined Obfuscation ––Alienation with Self-Justification ––We WILL use COMMENT ERADICATION.IN ADDITIONGratuitous Displays of Extraneous Knowledge Offered Not To Shed Light Or Enhance the Discussion, But For The Primary Purpose Of Giving An Impression Of Superiority are obnoxiously SELF-AGGRANDIZING, and therefore, Subject to Removal at the Discretion of the Censor-in-Residence.