Friday, February 15, 2013


WHO KNEW?

Greatest Living President 
is Also Fantastic Painter

"George W. Bush in the Bathtub" by George W. Bush

"George W. Bush in the Shower" by George W. Bush

February 8, 2013 12:23 pm

The illegal hacking of Bush family email accounts had an unanticipated consequence, The Smoking Gun reports:
“The hacker also intercepted photos that George W. Bush e-mailed two months ago to his sister showing paintings that he was working on, including self-portraits of him showering and in a bathtub. Another image shows the former president painting at the family’s Maine retreat. His subject is St. Ann’s Episcopal Church, a historic seaside chapel down the road from the sprawling Kennebunkport compound.”
The paintings demonstrate a command of line and color that is rarely seen in the modern-day “art” world. Former President George W. Bush appears to be influenced by such painters as Edgar Degas  and Edouard Manet. The portraits also clearly capture the personality of their subject.

26 comments:

  1. Vincent van Gogh immediately came to my mind when I saw his work.

    I like it!

    ReplyDelete
  2. His subdued palette clearly reflects Caravaggio though he hasn't learned to be as expressive.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The subject matter leaves a bit to be desired. ;)

    ReplyDelete
  4. All Narcissus needs is an Echo.

    ReplyDelete
  5. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  6. "Clearly, Dubya could give this guy a lesson or two."

    Just as you doubtless might benefit from tutelage by Gaston Lachaise or Brancusi -- and I by Paul Hindemith or Benjamin Britten. ;-)

    Aren't you astounded that dear old Dubya paints AT ALL?

    I certainly was.

    ReplyDelete
  7. "His subdued palette clearly reflects Caravaggio though he hasn't learned to be as expressive."

    A most interesting comparison, Ducky!

    I have to admit there IS a certain integrity to what she's done, AND it has the virtue of simplicity.

    ReplyDelete
  8. None of us were "supposed" to know anything about Dubya's artistic endeavors, FJ. These pictures came to us via an apparent HACKING, ergo, I doubt there's a whole lot of vanity involved.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      Delete
  10. Mr. Free Thinke, do you have a blog email?

    ReplyDelete
  11. Yes, I do, Ms. Shaw.

    I never use it, but you're welcome to try to reach me at FreeThinke@gmail.com.

    Currently there are hundreds and hundreds of "Anonymous comments piled up at that address. I suppose I ought to attend to them.

    I look forward to hearing from YOU very soon.

    ~ FreeThinke

    ReplyDelete
  12. I think it's fantastic that he paints. It doesn't surprise me though.

    FJ, we paint, write, photo, draw what we know. So? :-)

    ReplyDelete
  13. He's good. At least the bathtub picture is good. The shower picture isn't as good. I think he's attracted to the visual effects of water, steam, how his legs disappear and then re-emerge etc. Nothing wrong with that. Subject is never the most important thing in art anyway.

    ReplyDelete
  14. FT,
    I delete hundreds of spam comments from my email account every day. I have learned to delete them en masse by clicking the box next to each spam email, then hitting the delete icon at the top of the screen.

    ReplyDelete
  15. They look pretty good to me . A lot better than some of the work that I've seen in some art galleries.

    ReplyDelete
  16. FJ, we paint, write, photo, draw what we know. So?

    So... nothing. Perhaps if we were to be informed that he has painted landscapes, or other subjects, my opinion would not be so harsh. But if 100% of his known works are self-portraits and autobiographical...

    And Sir Winston Churchill was a wonderful painter... but his "subjects" were many and varied.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Certainly true that about Sir Winston. I visited Chartwell in 1981 and consequently the studio where many of his canvases hang.

    I remember being tremendously impressed by the high quality and great scope of Churchill's work.

    I'm sure if I had seen these same pictures in a gallery signed with another name, I would have been just as favorably impressed.

    Churchill was also an amateur bricklayer. His efforts in that direction are far less successful than his paintings.

    Chartwell, itself, is a beautiful home -- and it IS a home not a palace. I loved being there. That visit remains a continuing source of inspiration and a good influence on my own domestic surroundings.

    ReplyDelete
  18. I will say that for self portraits, the subject matter is very self depracating... as if to say, "I'm just a regular guy".

    But I don't believe that he should have to think of himself as such or believe that others would want to think of him as such. He has done extraordinary things. He should be appreciated for being "more" than just an average shmuck.

    I'm not saying that he should "put on airs", as Obama does. But he is worthy of a little more "respect" than a painting of his legs in a bath tub offer.

    ReplyDelete
  19. George W. Bush's artistic talent takes a distant second place to his brilliant insight into the American economy : "this sucker could fall".

    That's after about 8 years of his "conservative" leadership and the first phase of "saving the economy" with Henry Paulson was near at hand.

    ReplyDelete
  20. I remember being tremendously impressed by the high quality and great scope of Churchill's work.

    ----
    Stick to music.

    He was a competent Sunday painter.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Just as you are a competent Sunday photographer, duckman.

    Just don't quit your day job. ..

    Oh wait, its' film! ;)

    ReplyDelete
  22. To Our Dear Canardo

    

Grating on our nerves with irksome quacking

    Offered in a bilious spirit vile

    Find better occupation than this hacking.

    Use your time for something more worthwhile.
    Could you for once relent, and quit your jeering?

    Kindergarten kids show better manners.

    Your comments sound too often like Bronx cheering.

    Oh why must you into our works throw spanners --

    Using childish taunts and gibes and sneers?
    Regale us please, instead, with something merry.

    Surprise us after all these noisome years.
    Entertain -- enlighten -- serve some Sherry --
    Let your mind subject itself to scouring

    Filth away that keeps you dark and glowering.



    Love,

    FT

    ReplyDelete

IF YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND THE FOLLOWING, YOU DON'T BELONG HERE, SO KINDLY GET OUT AND STAY OUT.

We welcome Conversation
But without Vituperation.
If your aim is Vilification ––
Other forms of Denigration ––
Unfounded Accusation --
Determined Obfuscation ––
Alienation with Self-Justification ––
We WILL use COMMENT ERADICATION.


IN ADDITION

Gratuitous Displays of Extraneous Knowledge Offered Not To Shed Light Or Enhance the Discussion, But For The Primary Purpose Of Giving An Impression Of Superiority are obnoxiously SELF-AGGRANDIZING, and therefore, Subject to Removal at the Discretion of the Censor-in-Residence.

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.