Yes, but they never answered their frequently asked question:
"Why DON'T we do it in the road?"
I am amazed The Liberal League Lauding Lewdness and Licentious Lubriciousness has not already brought suit in favor of unfettered sexual expression in all public spaces including parks, museums, churches, bus and railway stations, stores, hotel lobbies, theaters, bars, restaurant and sidewalk cafe tabletops.
If a couple – straight or gay –– or even a GROUP just out for a good time –– feels the urge during a performance, no one should have the right to prevent them from getting up on the stage to do their thing in front of the audience.
I'm sure SCOTUS is virtually champing at the bit in their eagerness to hand down a decision in favor of such a policy.
And think what it will for the children! They will be able to receive a truly LIBERAL education on every street corner. With this New Birth of Freedom even their TEACHERS will be able to DEMONSTRATE exactly what they are discussing in Sex Education classes. Parents should be delighted that Student Volunteers will be encouraged to participate in Desktop Demonstrations with their TEACHERS and with EACH OTHER.
Paul actaully did answer this in one of his extended interviews devoted to his specialist subject "Me, and how I am so great:"
"Why Don't We Do It In The Road? could have applied to either fucking or shitting, to put it roughly. Why don't we do either of them in the road? Well, the answer is we're civilised and we don't. But the song was just to pose that question. Why Don't We Do It In The Road? was a primitive statement to do with sex or to do with freedom really."
Yes, the song contains only the question and not the answer, but it's only short.
You jump in front of my car when you, you know all the time that Ninety miles an hour, girl, is the speed I drive You tell me it's alright, you don't mind a little pain You say you just want me to take you for a ride
You're just like crosstown traffic So hard to get through to you Crosstown traffic I don't need to run over you Crosstown traffic All you do is slow me down And I'm tryin' to get on the other side of town
I'm not the only soul who's accused of hit and run Tire tracks all across your back I can see you had your fun But darlin' can't you see my signals turn from green to red And with you I can see a traffic jam straight up ahead
You're just like crosstown traffic So hard to get through to you Crosstown traffic I don't need to run over you Crosstown traffic All you do is slow me down And I got better things on the other side of town
~ Jimi Hendrix
PLEASE say it isn't so. TELL us you DIDN'T mean it.
JIMI HENDRIX was the moral equivalent of a ROAD APPLE, himself, and a really stinky one at that. PHEW!
The accompanying article, which I did not bother to reprint, told us that virtually all formerly criminal activity involving bodily functions will be decriminalized.
I thin this abandonment of long-held standards of decency is rationalized and glossed over as Bringing the Law into Conformance with Reality.
Now that I've thought more about it I realize the intent of Liberal Thought has been to turn every square inch of the entire nation into a LATRINE and a FORNICATORIUM. };-)>
Who needs sewers? Who needs toilets? Who needs Motel Rooms? The Great Outdoors has been declared One Giant Pisspot and Defecatorium.
CIVILIZATION?
WHO NEEDS IT? The entire concept was a BIG WRONG TURN.
People like the Commie Nazis on the Liberal and progressive boards have always expressed the reason why I hate liberals!. These people are literally dumb sheep.
They are actually more pro Africans , pro Moslems, thieves and thugs,, dictators, terrorists, murderers, racists, liars, Anti American, Anti Christian, Anti Jewish, Anti God, Anti Law abiding, Anti Constitution, then pro American.. With their choice's of presidents, Supream Judges etc. America will indeed become a hell hole for freaks and low-lifes like Mexica is today.
Before I say anything, I have to say this; SOME PEOPLE ARE STUPID AS BRICKS Everybody has the right to be stupid, but the folks over at that “Progressive” blog takes First prize! If there wasn’t already enough actual BS taking place on these here blogging boards, and other assorted insanity taking place in this United States, we have MORONS that make up LIES, post them on a blog, convince a few weak-minded loons that these lies are real and then they spread these lies across social media in an effort to scare the crap out of some people. Being that these stupid Liberals are beating up the confederate flag for no other reason but because of the fact that they are ignorant and to make themselves feel better they are re-writting history! What LIES you ask? Well, try this on for size. I asked that Ding-Bat Shaw this simple question: “Did the American flag represented a government that made slavery legal. does disagreeing with federal law mean one is evil? Was MLK evil because he disagreed with federal law that made discrimination against blacks legal? What hogwash. The Constitution was on the side of the South. The Constitution did not make slavery illegal, nor did it make secession illegal. And both issues were debate and voted on by the Constitutional convention.”
In a discussion between Shaw Kenawe and Dave Miller the facts that they stated presented a weak argument! I happen to be pro Confederate the flag. And my reasoning is that either secession, or slavery were illegal under the Constitution. So the South were neither traitors, or criminals under the Constitution. They just disagreed with the federal government trying to make both illegal. Slavery wasn't made illegal by rewriting the Constitution, but by presidential decree, which the South though was unconstitutional, a fair disagreement, if we are talking the rule of law. The flag should disappear and should have long ago, but it wasn't illegal for the Dixiecrats to use it, just in bad taste. I disagreed with your statement that just because any group, disagrees with the federal government, doesn't make them EVIL, is the word YOU used. They were not traitors simply because they disagreed with Lincoln either. You can't talk away the fact that the American flag was the symbol of a slave nation. Thank God that has all changed, but you are in the wrong to deny it.
The confederate flag has nothing to do with slavery...The flag is not racist. It is a symbol of patriots who were willing to die to protect this country and make sure it remained as the founders intended. Slavery was never the reason fir the war but only an excuse to start one.Lincoln could care less if slavery remained and is on record stating such, even offering to make slavery legal in the Southern states in return for the South compromising their beliefs. In contrast, Jefferson Davis had a written plan to end slavery within five years. We are still fighting the same battle as was fought back then. Freedom with as little interference from the federal government as possible. Teach children the truth and it will sit us ALL free. The confederate flag is not racist because the Civil War was about States Rights and anybody who wants to say it is racist is a complete idiot, do you get that Shaw? I have had enough of these lefties trying to re-write History to suite their bigoted
My goodness! Such a heavy dose of vehement assertions!
First, I have to say that I wish you –– and everyone else –– would please leave Miss Shaw's name OUT of any statements made here. I don't approve of tattling, and I certainly don't appreciate attempts to foment or exacerbate FEUDS between bloggers.
Second, legal scholars have wrangled –– and are still wrangling –– over the question of whether the Constitution and the Original Intent of the Founders did, indeed permit secession once the union was formed. I thought it did, but others have jumped down my throat with hobnailed boots for saying so in the past. I've tried to do mild research to find a clear cut answer, and have failed.
The Left has it own set of facts, and so does the Right. Each frequently contradicts and attempts to negate the other. Neither side EVER bothers to LISTEN to the Other. No one seems willing to DISCUSS their differences politely and intelligently. All we do these days is retreat behind our barricades and immediately start throwing metaphorical rocks, garbage, broken glass, hand grenades and Molotov Cocktails at each other shouting curses all the while.
I've had dear old friends of longstanding end visits this way, and l eave in a huff, if anyone dares introduce a "hot topic, and tries to discuss it openly.
I did not delete your statement, but I feel I probably should have because of the name-calling, and inaccuracies in your too forceful assertions.
Nevertheless, I know you are sincere, and I agree with many of your sentiments. I just don't like the way you express them.
We ALL need to TONE DOWN a little, and TRY to avoid INSULTS and COMBATIVE rhetoric.
A little tip: Instead of calling someone a moron or a "libtard," try politely asking them a QUESTION such as, "What makes you think that?" - OR - "Where did you get your information?" - OR - "What makes you so sure that Socialism produces greater benefits to most people than Capitalism?
You accuse the Left of being bigoted. I certainly agree. They are, BUT do you not realize that the Right is ALSO bigoted?
We desperately need to make more effort to look at the issues from ALL sides if we ever hope to break the current logjam which hampers us from taking constructive action that might improve our situation.
Mutual HATRED produces nothing but intellectual paralysis and growing fury.
First of all, I have something to say and this ia Not the first time that I’ve had to say this....Democrats, Progressives and all the other assorted Liberal scumbags are always screaming about something or another, and if there wasn’t already enough actual BS taking place, rights being abused, freedoms being threatened and other assorted insanity taking place in this United States, we have MORONS that make up LIES, post them on a blog, convince a few weak-minded loons that these lies are real and then they spread these lies across social media in an effort to scare the crap out of some people. The confederate flag is NOT about racism, and no matter how loud these lefty loons scream and cry, the confederate flag is about Southern pride! The Confederacy is part of our history! The Lefty Loons will dig up anything and everything that they can to make their point. It doesn’t matter if it’s factual or not. ! This is an outrage! And SHAME on those South Caroliniana Lefty Loons and the congress and Senate who are the latest cowards that bowed to the PC Police.
Maybe I get offended by all of the Martin Luther King pictures and Holiday’s that are attributed to him!. And maybe I want all those Martin Luther King statues removed from any public lands anywhere in this nation; even from federal lands in the slummy capitol. There better not be a MLK statue on public lands anywhere or we will sue for its removal and if you don’t….we will move it for you. Hell….I think I am beginning to be offended by every statue on federal land and I want them moved. I want the Lincoln monument gone. IT glorifies a fool and a federalists who did illegal things to get his way. I am insulted by him. I want him gone….etc. We all can be insulted by one thing or another and we on the Right never Bitch and Moan about it! So just because one group of Loons say The Stars and Bars can’t be a symbol of the Confederacy, because it was never officially sanctioned by The Confederate Congress, doesn’t mean it’s not a racist symbol of The Confederate Just because you have something that someone else claims to believe otherwise doesn’t make it true. Don’t bame the flag. Blame Obama and the Progressive activists, who want to BAN everything that they don’t believe in, like hate and resentment of white peoples history, and who made the flag come down.
You sound an awful lot like "Rick" up there. Are you sure you're not the same person? Neither one of you separates the paragraphs in your prepared statements. Don't you realize that discourages others from bothering to read what you've written? Couldn't you do something better than just venting your spleen? it doesn't help much, as I'm sure FT would agree..
No Mame, I'm not "Rick". I’m just trying my best to educate the looney tunes, aka the lefty idiots about the Confederate Flag, and the way us Southerner’s feel about it. I never claimed to be a Saint, or that my IQ was on the same level as Albert Einstein’s, or that my grammar, or punctuation was the greatest. I’m just a Southerner who entered the US Army at the age of 18 instead of going to college.
Your racist, euro-centric social constructs are crumbling. How does it feel?
One day, the jackboot will be on the other foot, and your chickens will come home to roost in a white-minority America, where black, brown and red people can breath free again.
You will learn from first-hand experience what we have been trying to tell you.
Do you TGOPers seriously believe that the JERK Trump has any chance of winning the nomination or the presidency? You think that because we on the left talk about him and expose his demagoguery that means we're afraid that he's going to be the GOP nominee and eventually the president? Seriously?
Do you accuse the folks on the right of being trepidatious when they attack Hillary. Does that mean they have a fixation on her?
This is an election cycle. You know what that means.
I'm not a big fan of Lindsey Graham, but I respect that he had the courage to call Trump out on his blanket slander of Latinos and Hispanics.
Your comment is IRRELEVANT, and SHOULD be SCRAPPED, but it gives me a good chance to teach you how to improve your writing skills –– and your manners:
YOUR WAY: Do you TGOPers seriously believe that the JERK Trump has any chance of winning the nomination or the presidency?
FT's WAY: Do you Tea Party members seriously believe that the flamboyant Mr. Trump has any chance of winning the Republican nomination for president, or that he has any chance of winning the election in the unlikely event he becomes the nominee?
YOUR WAY: You think that because we on the left talk about him and expose his demagoguery that means we're afraid that he's going to be the GOP nominee and eventually the president? Seriously?
FT's WAY: Do you seriously believe that because we leftists talk abut Mr. Trump, and expose his blatant pandering to right wing extremists that we fear his potential candidacy?
YOUR WAY: Do you accuse the folks on the right of being trepidatious when they attack Hillary. Does that mean they have a fixation on her?
FT's WAY: Are you Conservatives as afraid of Hillary as you'd like to believe we leftists are of Mr. Trump?
YOUR WAY: This is an election cycle. You know what that means.
FT's WAY: We are entering another presidential election cycle, so tempers are bound to be short, tolerance and courtesy in short supply and mendacity bound to reign supreme.
YOUR WAY: I'm not a big fan of Lindsey Graham, but I respect that he had the courage to call Trump out on his blanket slander of Latinos and Hispanics.
FT's WAY: I'm not one of Lindsey Graham's greatest admirer's but I do respect the courage he showed in denouncing Mr. Trump's overly generalized denigration of illegal Mexican immigrants.
We're not discussing CONTENT or SUBSTANCE, Thersites, it's all about how to express yourself more clearly in better style by writing in better, more complex and polished ENGLISH.
I figure it never hurts to remind myself and others how it OUGHT to be done instead of just letting everything slide, as it's been doing unabated for the past half-century.
The person I addressed may be a hopeless case, but that's not true of everyone who stops by –- I hope. ;-)
IF YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND THE FOLLOWING, YOU DON'T BELONG HERE, SO KINDLY GET OUT AND STAY OUT.
We welcome Conversation But without Vituperation. If your aim is Vilification –– Other forms of Denigration –– Unfounded Accusation -- Determined Obfuscation –– Alienation with Self-Justification –– We WILL use COMMENT ERADICATION.
IN ADDITION
Gratuitous Displays of Extraneous Knowledge Offered Not To Shed Light Or Enhance the Discussion, But For The Primary Purpose Of Giving An Impression Of Superiority are obnoxiously SELF-AGGRANDIZING, and therefore, Subject to Removal at the Discretion of the Censor-in-Residence.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.
What Next?
ReplyDeleteSEX on the SIDEWALK
Watch For It.
------
That's why I never go anywhere without the camera.
DUCKY!
DeleteDo you hear the sirens going off, the bells ringing, the gongs sounding, the brass bands playing, the glee clubs bellowing their hearts out?
With this one post YOU have revolutionized Conservative Perception of Reality and changed it forever.
How?
You have demonstrated ever-so deftly that
LEFTISTS DO HAVE A SENSE OF HUMOR AFTER ALL.
C––O––N––G––R––A––T––U-–L––A––T––I––O––N––S––!
§;-D=
That possibility has been raised before. >'-)
ReplyDeletehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KM02WcvlKn0
Yes, but they never answered their frequently asked question:
Delete"Why DON'T we do it in the road?"
I am amazed The Liberal League Lauding Lewdness and Licentious Lubriciousness has not already brought suit in favor of unfettered sexual expression in all public spaces including parks, museums, churches, bus and railway stations, stores, hotel lobbies, theaters, bars, restaurant and sidewalk cafe tabletops.
If a couple – straight or gay –– or even a GROUP just out for a good time –– feels the urge during a performance, no one should have the right to prevent them from getting up on the stage to do their thing in front of the audience.
I'm sure SCOTUS is virtually champing at the bit in their eagerness to hand down a decision in favor of such a policy.
And think what it will for the children! They will be able to receive a truly LIBERAL education on every street corner. With this New Birth of Freedom even their TEACHERS will be able to DEMONSTRATE exactly what they are discussing in Sex Education classes. Parents should be delighted that Student Volunteers will be encouraged to participate in Desktop Demonstrations with their TEACHERS and with EACH OTHER.
WHOOP DEE DOO!
Paul actaully did answer this in one of his extended interviews devoted to his specialist subject "Me, and how I am so great:"
Delete"Why Don't We Do It In The Road? could have applied to either fucking or shitting, to put it roughly. Why don't we do either of them in the road? Well, the answer is we're civilised and we don't. But the song was just to pose that question. Why Don't We Do It In The Road? was a primitive statement to do with sex or to do with freedom really."
Yes, the song contains only the question and not the answer, but it's only short.
One good reason to avoid doing it in the road. >;-)
Deletehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DzAx_w9XoC0
The Beatles in 1968 ("The White Album"). Paul McCartney's solo track.
DeleteYou couldn't possibly mean THIS, could you? (:-x
DeleteYou jump in front of my car when you,
you know all the time that
Ninety miles an hour, girl, is the speed I drive
You tell me it's alright, you don't mind a little pain
You say you just want me to take you for a ride
You're just like crosstown traffic
So hard to get through to you
Crosstown traffic
I don't need to run over you
Crosstown traffic
All you do is slow me down
And I'm tryin' to get on the other side of town
I'm not the only soul who's accused of hit and run
Tire tracks all across your back
I can see you had your fun
But darlin' can't you see my signals turn from green to red
And with you I can see a traffic jam straight up ahead
You're just like crosstown traffic
So hard to get through to you
Crosstown traffic
I don't need to run over you
Crosstown traffic
All you do is slow me down
And I got better things on the other side of town
~ Jimi Hendrix
PLEASE say it isn't so. TELL us you DIDN'T mean it.
JIMI HENDRIX was the moral equivalent of a ROAD APPLE, himself, and a really stinky one at that. PHEW!
More extra-legal "privatization" of "public" spaces.
ReplyDeleteThe accompanying article, which I did not bother to reprint, told us that virtually all formerly criminal activity involving bodily functions will be decriminalized.
DeleteI thin this abandonment of long-held standards of decency is rationalized and glossed over as Bringing the Law into Conformance with Reality.
Now that I've thought more about it I realize the intent of Liberal Thought has been to turn every square inch of the entire nation into a LATRINE and a FORNICATORIUM. };-)>
DeleteWho needs sewers? Who needs toilets? Who needs Motel Rooms? The Great Outdoors has been declared One Giant Pisspot and Defecatorium.
CIVILIZATION?
WHO NEEDS IT? The entire concept was a BIG WRONG TURN.
People like the Commie Nazis on the Liberal and progressive boards have always expressed the reason why I hate liberals!. These people are literally dumb sheep.
ReplyDeleteThey are actually more pro Africans , pro Moslems, thieves and thugs,, dictators, terrorists, murderers, racists, liars, Anti American, Anti Christian, Anti Jewish, Anti God, Anti Law abiding, Anti Constitution, then pro American..
With their choice's of presidents, Supream Judges etc. America will indeed become a hell hole for freaks and low-lifes like Mexica is today.
The Great Fornicator said
ReplyDeleteDOWN WITH DECENCY!
UP WITH DEGENERACY!
Leftwing Progressivism is a grave danger to humanity.
ReplyDeleteI'm sure Deballsio and his socialist confreres will blame Bush, Reagan, and those damned Tea Baggers, Fox News and Donald Trump.
Unseemliness is the new "culture."
ReplyDeleteBefore I say anything, I have to say this; SOME PEOPLE ARE STUPID AS BRICKS
ReplyDeleteEverybody has the right to be stupid, but the folks over at that “Progressive” blog takes First prize!
If there wasn’t already enough actual BS taking place on these here blogging boards, and other assorted insanity taking place in this United States, we have MORONS that make up LIES, post them on a blog, convince a few weak-minded loons that these lies are real and then they spread these lies across social media in an effort to scare the crap out of some people.
Being that these stupid Liberals are beating up the confederate flag for no other reason but because of the fact that they are ignorant and to make themselves feel better they are re-writting history!
What LIES you ask? Well, try this on for size.
I asked that Ding-Bat Shaw this simple question:
“Did the American flag represented a government that made slavery legal.
does disagreeing with federal law mean one is evil? Was MLK evil because he disagreed with federal law that made discrimination against blacks legal? What hogwash. The Constitution was on the side of the South. The Constitution did not make slavery illegal, nor did it make secession illegal. And both issues were debate and voted on by the Constitutional convention.”
In a discussion between Shaw Kenawe and Dave Miller the facts that they stated presented a weak argument! I happen to be pro Confederate the flag. And my reasoning is that either secession, or slavery were illegal under the Constitution. So the South were neither traitors, or criminals under the Constitution. They just disagreed with the federal government trying to make both illegal. Slavery wasn't made illegal by rewriting the Constitution, but by presidential decree, which the South though was unconstitutional, a fair disagreement, if we are talking the rule of law. The flag should disappear and should have long ago, but it wasn't illegal for the Dixiecrats to use it, just in bad taste. I disagreed with your statement that just because any group, disagrees with the federal government, doesn't make them EVIL, is the word YOU used. They were not traitors simply because they disagreed with Lincoln either. You can't talk away the fact that the American flag was the symbol of a slave nation. Thank God that has all changed, but you are in the wrong to deny it.
The confederate flag has nothing to do with slavery...The flag is not racist. It is a symbol of patriots who were willing to die to protect this country and make sure it remained as the founders intended. Slavery was never the reason fir the war but only an excuse to start one.Lincoln could care less if slavery remained and is on record stating such, even offering to make slavery legal in the Southern states in return for the South compromising their beliefs. In contrast, Jefferson Davis had a written plan to end slavery within five years. We are still fighting the same battle as was fought back then. Freedom with as little interference from the federal government as possible. Teach children the truth and it will sit us ALL free.
The confederate flag is not racist because the Civil War was about States Rights and anybody who wants to say it is racist is a complete idiot, do you get that Shaw?
I have had enough of these lefties trying to re-write History to suite their bigoted
My goodness! Such a heavy dose of vehement assertions!
DeleteFirst, I have to say that I wish you –– and everyone else –– would please leave Miss Shaw's name OUT of any statements made here. I don't approve of tattling, and I certainly don't appreciate attempts to foment or exacerbate FEUDS between bloggers.
Second, legal scholars have wrangled –– and are still wrangling –– over the question of whether the Constitution and the Original Intent of the Founders did, indeed permit secession once the union was formed. I thought it did, but others have jumped down my throat with hobnailed boots for saying so in the past. I've tried to do mild research to find a clear cut answer, and have failed.
The Left has it own set of facts, and so does the Right. Each frequently contradicts and attempts to negate the other. Neither side EVER bothers to LISTEN to the Other. No one seems willing to DISCUSS their differences politely and intelligently. All we do these days is retreat behind our barricades and immediately start throwing metaphorical rocks, garbage, broken glass, hand grenades and Molotov Cocktails at each other shouting curses all the while.
I've had dear old friends of longstanding end visits this way, and l
eave in a huff, if anyone dares introduce a "hot topic, and tries to discuss it openly.
I did not delete your statement, but I feel I probably should have because of the name-calling, and inaccuracies in your too forceful assertions.
Nevertheless, I know you are sincere, and I agree with many of your sentiments. I just don't like the way you express them.
We ALL need to TONE DOWN a little, and TRY to avoid INSULTS and COMBATIVE rhetoric.
A little tip: Instead of calling someone a moron or a "libtard," try politely asking them a QUESTION such as, "What makes you think that?" - OR - "Where did you get your information?" - OR - "What makes you so sure that Socialism produces greater benefits to most people than Capitalism?
You accuse the Left of being bigoted. I certainly agree. They are, BUT do you not realize that the Right is ALSO bigoted?
We desperately need to make more effort to look at the issues from ALL sides if we ever hope to break the current logjam which hampers us from taking constructive action that might improve our situation.
Mutual HATRED produces nothing but intellectual paralysis and growing fury.
You are beginning to almost sound like a moderate. I said ALMOST. ;-)
DeleteFirst of all, I have something to say and this ia Not the first time that I’ve had to say this....Democrats, Progressives and all the other assorted Liberal scumbags are always screaming about something or another, and if there wasn’t already enough actual BS taking place, rights being abused, freedoms being threatened and other assorted insanity taking place in this United States, we have MORONS that make up LIES, post them on a blog, convince a few weak-minded loons that these lies are real and then they spread these lies across social media in an effort to scare the crap out of some people.
ReplyDeleteThe confederate flag is NOT about racism, and no matter how loud these lefty loons scream and cry, the confederate flag is about Southern pride! The Confederacy is part of our history! The Lefty Loons will dig up anything and everything that they can to make their point. It doesn’t matter if it’s factual or not. ! This is an outrage!
And SHAME on those South Caroliniana Lefty Loons and the congress and Senate who are the latest cowards that bowed to the PC Police.
Maybe I get offended by all of the Martin Luther King pictures and Holiday’s that are attributed to him!. And maybe I want all those Martin Luther King statues removed from any public lands anywhere in this nation; even from federal lands in the slummy capitol. There better not be a MLK statue on public lands anywhere or we will sue for its removal and if you don’t….we will move it for you. Hell….I think I am beginning to be offended by every statue on federal land and I want them moved. I want the Lincoln monument gone. IT glorifies a fool and a federalists who did illegal things to get his way. I am insulted by him. I want him gone….etc. We all can be insulted by one thing or another and we on the Right never Bitch and Moan about it!
So just because one group of Loons say The Stars and Bars can’t be a symbol of the Confederacy, because it was never officially sanctioned by The Confederate Congress, doesn’t mean it’s not a racist symbol of The Confederate
Just because you have something that someone else claims to believe otherwise doesn’t make it true.
Don’t bame the flag. Blame Obama and the Progressive activists, who want to BAN everything that they don’t believe in, like hate and resentment of white peoples history, and who made the flag come down.
You sound an awful lot like "Rick" up there. Are you sure you're not the same person? Neither one of you separates the paragraphs in your prepared statements. Don't you realize that discourages others from bothering to read what you've written? Couldn't you do something better than just venting your spleen? it doesn't help much, as I'm sure FT would agree..
Delete----------------------> Katharine Heartburn
No Mame, I'm not "Rick". I’m just trying my best to educate the looney tunes, aka the lefty idiots about the Confederate Flag, and the way us Southerner’s feel about it. I never claimed to be a Saint, or that my IQ was on the same level as Albert Einstein’s, or that my grammar, or punctuation was the greatest.
DeleteI’m just a Southerner who entered the US Army at the age of 18 instead of going to college.
You're Freethinke. Behave.
Delete....................... . . . . ლ(ಠ益ಠ)ლ
ReplyDelete!!!!!!!!!!!!!PUBIC MASTARBATION make Loofah Angry!!!!!!!!!!!!
HOOP-zApl
Is does sound pretty hairy.
DeleteYour racist, euro-centric social constructs are crumbling. How does it feel?
ReplyDeleteOne day, the jackboot will be on the other foot, and your chickens will come home to roost in a white-minority America, where black, brown and red people can breath free again.
You will learn from first-hand experience what we have been trying to tell you.
Do you TGOPers seriously believe that the JERK Trump has any chance of winning the nomination or the presidency? You think that because we on the left talk about him and expose his demagoguery that means we're afraid that he's going to be the GOP nominee and eventually the president? Seriously?
ReplyDeleteDo you accuse the folks on the right of being trepidatious when they attack Hillary. Does that mean they have a fixation on her?
This is an election cycle. You know what that means.
I'm not a big fan of Lindsey Graham, but I respect that he had the courage to call Trump out on his blanket slander of Latinos and Hispanics.
Your comment is IRRELEVANT, and SHOULD be SCRAPPED, but it gives me a good chance to teach you how to improve your writing skills –– and your manners:
ReplyDeleteYOUR WAY: Do you TGOPers seriously believe that the JERK Trump has any chance of winning the nomination or the presidency?
FT's WAY: Do you Tea Party members seriously believe that the flamboyant Mr. Trump has any chance of winning the Republican nomination for president, or that he has any chance of winning the election in the unlikely event he becomes the nominee?
YOUR WAY: You think that because we on the left talk about him and expose his demagoguery that means we're afraid that he's going to be the GOP nominee and eventually the president? Seriously?
FT's WAY: Do you seriously believe that because we leftists talk abut Mr. Trump, and expose his blatant pandering to right wing extremists that we fear his potential candidacy?
YOUR WAY: Do you accuse the folks on the right of being trepidatious when they attack Hillary. Does that mean they have a fixation on her?
FT's WAY: Are you Conservatives as afraid of Hillary as you'd like to believe we leftists are of Mr. Trump?
YOUR WAY: This is an election cycle. You know what that means.
FT's WAY: We are entering another presidential election cycle, so tempers are bound to be short, tolerance and courtesy in short supply and mendacity bound to reign supreme.
YOUR WAY: I'm not a big fan of Lindsey Graham, but I respect that he had the courage to call Trump out on his blanket slander of Latinos and Hispanics.
FT's WAY: I'm not one of Lindsey Graham's greatest admirer's but I do respect the courage he showed in denouncing Mr. Trump's overly generalized denigration of illegal Mexican immigrants.
Well stated, young man. I'm quite proud of you.
DeleteI suspect that you're wasting your time on a closed mind, but it is your time to waste. Have fun, FT. :)
DeleteWe're not discussing CONTENT or SUBSTANCE, Thersites, it's all about how to express yourself more clearly in better style by writing in better, more complex and polished ENGLISH.
DeleteI figure it never hurts to remind myself and others how it OUGHT to be done instead of just letting everything slide, as it's been doing unabated for the past half-century.
The person I addressed may be a hopeless case, but that's not true of everyone who stops by –- I hope. ;-)
"Bread cast upon the waters," and all that.
How would Trashmouth Al write it.
ReplyDelete